Search
Data source
EU member states
Other countries
Keywords
Tags
Displaying 1061 - 1080 of 1315
F.A.H & others v. Colombia
F.A.H others v. Colombia CCPR/C/119/D/2121/2011 Communication number s : 2121/2011 Author: F.A.H others Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 119 Country Colombia Submission date 22 Jun 2010 Date of decision 28 Mar 2017 Comment: This JUTBCCPR/C/119/D/2121/2011https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2264/en-US
F.E.C. v. Spain
F.E.C. v. Spain CCPR/C/130/D/3810/2020 Communication number s : 3810/2020 Author: F.E.C. Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 130 Country Spain Submission date 19 Nov 2019 Date of decision 06 Nov 2020 Comment: This document has no JUTBCCPR/C/130/D/3810/2020https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/3246/en-US
F.K.M. v. Netherlands
F.K.M. v. Netherlands CAT/C/74/D/954/2019 Communication number s : 954/2019 Author: F.K.M. Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 74 Country Netherlands Submission date 20 Jun 2019 Date of decision 21 Jul 2022 Comment: This document has no JUTBCAT/C/74/D/954/2019https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/3458/en-US
FOURTH EVALUATION ROUND Corruption prevention in respect of members of parliament, judges and prosecutors EVALUATION REPORT GERMANY
FOURTH EVALUATION ROUND Corruption prevention in respect of members of parliament judges and prosecutors EVALUATION REPORT GERMANY DEU 2014 10 10 2015 01 28 TABLE OF CONTENTS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY I. INTRODUCTION AND METHODOLOGY II. CONTEXT III. CORRUPTION GRECOGreco-Eval-IV-Rep-2014-1E-Final-Germany-PUBLIChttps://hudoc.greco.coe.int/eng?i=Greco-Eval-IV-Rep-2014-1E-Final-Germany-PUBLIC
FOURTH EVALUATION ROUND Corruption prevention in respect of members of parliament, judges and prosecutors EVALUATION REPORT IRELAND
FOURTH EVALUATION ROUND Corruption prevention in respect of members of parliament judges and prosecutors EVALUATION REPORT IRELAND IRL 2014 10 10 2014 11 21 TABLE OF CONTENTS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY I. INTRODUCTION AND METHODOLOGY II. CONTEXT III. CORRUPTION GRECOGreco-Eval-IV-Rep-2014-3E-Final-Ireland-PUBLIChttps://hudoc.greco.coe.int/eng?i=Greco-Eval-IV-Rep-2014-3E-Final-Ireland-PUBLIC
FOURTH EVALUATION ROUND Corruption prevention in respect of members of parliament, judges and prosecutors EVALUATION REPORT POLAND
FOURTH EVALUATION ROUND Corruption prevention in respect of members of parliament judges and prosecutors EVALUATION REPORT POLAND POL 2012 10 19 2013 01 25 TABLE OF CONTENTS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY I. INTRODUCTION AND METHODOLOGY II. CONTEXT III. CORRUPTION GRECOGreco-Eval-IV-Rep-2012-4E-Final-Poland-PUBLIChttps://hudoc.greco.coe.int/eng?i=Greco-Eval-IV-Rep-2012-4E-Final-Poland-PUBLIC
FOURTH EVALUATION ROUND Corruption prevention in respect of members of parliament, judges and prosecutors EVALUATION REPORT SLOVENIA
FOURTH EVALUATION ROUND Corruption prevention in respect of members of parliament judges and prosecutors EVALUATION REPORT SLOVENIA SVN 2012 10 19 2013 05 30 TABLE OF CONTENTS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY I. INTRODUCTION AND METHODOLOGY II. CONTEXT III. CORRUPTION GRECOGreco-Eval-IV-Rep-2012-1E-Final-Slovenia-PUBLIChttps://hudoc.greco.coe.int/eng?i=Greco-Eval-IV-Rep-2012-1E-Final-Slovenia-PUBLIC
Fa'aaliga v. New Zealand
Fa aaliga v. New Zealand CCPR/C/85/D/1279/2004 Communication number s : 1279/2004 Author: Moleni Fa aaliga and Faatupu Fa aaliga Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 85 Country New Zealand Submission date 26 Feb 2004 Date of decision 28 JUTBCCPR/C/85/D/1279/2004https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1173/en-US
Fifth Round Evaluation Report on Denmark
Fifth Round Evaluation Report on Denmark DNK 2019 06 21 2019 09 04 Adoption: 21.06.2019 Publication: 04.09.2019 Public GrecoEval5Rep 2018 8 FIFTH EVALUATION ROUND Preventing corruption and promoting integrity in central governments top executive functions GRECOGrecoEval5Rep(2018)8-Final-eng-Denmark-PUBLIChttps://hudoc.greco.coe.int/eng?i=GrecoEval5Rep(2018)8-Final-eng-Denmark-PUBLIC
First Opinion on Austria
First Opinion on Austria AUT ACFC/INF/OP/I 2002 009 2002 05 16 2002 11 07 Strasbourg 7 November 2002 ACFC/INF/OP/I 2002 009 ADVISORY COMMITTEE ON THE FRAMEWORK CONVENTION FOR THE PROTECTION OF NATIONAL MINORITIES OPINION ON AUSTRIA adopted on 16 May 2002 FCNMACFC/INF/OP/I(2002)009https://hudoc.fcnm.coe.int/eng?i=1st_OP_Austria_en
Fourth Opinion on Bulgaria
Fourth Opinion on Bulgaria BGR ACFC/OP/IV 2020 001Final 2020 05 26 2020 10 12 ADVISORY COMMITTEE ON THE FRAMEWORK CONVENTION FOR THE PROTECTION OF NATIONAL MINORITIES ACFC/OP/IV 2020 001Final Fourth Opinion on Bulgaria adopted on 26 May 2020 Summary FCNMACFC/OP/IV(2020)001Finalhttps://hudoc.fcnm.coe.int/eng?i=4th_Op_Bulgaria_EN
Franck Kitenge Baruani v. Democratic Republic of the Congo
Franck Kitenge Baruani v. Democratic Republic of the Congo CCPR/C/110/D/1890/2009 Communication number s : 1890/2009 Author: Franck Kitenge Baruani represented by Anna Copeland SCALES Community Legal Centre Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No JUTBCCPR/C/110/D/1890/2009https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1804/en-US
G.C.A.A. v. Uruguay
G.C.A.A. v. Uruguay CCPR/C/115/D/2358/2014 Communication number s : 2358/2014 Author: G.C.A.A. Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 115 Country Uruguay Submission date 16 Mar 2012 Date of decision 02 Nov 2015 Comment: This document has no JUTBCCPR/C/115/D/2358/2014https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2090/en-US
Gobin v. Mauritius
Gobin v. Mauritius CCPR/C/72/D/787/1997 Communication number s : 787/1997 Author: Vishwadeo Gobin Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 72 Country Mauritius Submission date 25 Nov 1996 Date of decision 16 Jul 2001 Comment: author is JUTBCCPR/C/72/D/787/1997https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/935/en-US
Government comments on the fourth report on Luxembourg
Government comments on the fourth report on Luxembourg LUX 2011 12 08 2012 02 21 Government comments on the report on LUXEMBOURG APPENDIX: GOVERNMENT S VIEWPOINT APPENDIXThe following appendix does not form part of ECRI s analysis and proposals concerning ECRILUX-COM-IV-2012-004-ENGhttps://hudoc.ecri.coe.int/eng?i=LUX-COM-IV-2012-004-ENG
Groupe d’Intérêt pour le Matronyme v. France
Groupe d Int r t pour le Matronyme v. France CEDAW/C/44/D/12/2007 Communication number s : 012/2007 Author: Groupe d Int r t pour le Matronyme Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 44 Country France Submission date 26 May 2006 Date of JUTBCEDAW/C/44/D/12/2007https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1709/en-US
H.K. v. Norway
H.K. v. Norway CCPR/C/112/D/2004/2010 Communication number s : 2004/2010 Author: H.K. represented by counsel Christian B. Hjort and later by John Chr. Elden and Anders Brosveet Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 112 Country Norway Submission JUTBCCPR/C/112/D/2004/2010https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1898/en-US
Hacène Ferhati and Fatna Ferhati v. Algeria
Hac ne Ferhati and Fatna Ferhati v. Algeria CCPR/C/135/D/3125/2018 Communication number s : 3125/2018 Author: Hac ne Ferhati and Fatna Ferhati Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 135 Country Algeria Submission date 19 Oct 2017 Date of decision JUTBCCPR/C/135/D/3125/2018https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/3759/en-US
Hagan v. Australia
Hagan v. Australia CERD/C/62/D/26/2002 Communication number s : 026/2002 Author: Stephen Hagan Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 62 Country Australia Submission date 31 Jul 2002 Date of decision 20 Mar 2003 Comment: This document has no JUTBCERD/C/62/D/26/2002https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1745/en-US
Hart v. Australia
Hart v. Australia CCPR/C/70/D/947/2000 Communication number s : 947/2000 Author: Barry Hart Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 70 Country Australia Submission date 31 Jan 2000 Date of decision 25 Oct 2000 Comment: Under rule 85 of the JUTBCCPR/C/70/D/947/2000https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/906/en-US