Search
Data source
EU member states
Other countries
Keywords
Tags
Displaying 1 - 16 of 16
CASE OF BURGHARTZ v. SWITZERLAND
CASE OF BURGHARTZ v. SWITZERLAND 16213/90 N/A CHE 2/22/1994 12:00:00 AM Preliminary objection rejected victim Preliminary objection rejected non exhaustion Violation of Art. 14 8 Not necessary to examine Art. 8 Costs and expenses partial award domestic ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:1994:0222JUD001621390https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-57865
CASE OF EMEL BOYRAZ v. TURKEY
CASE OF EMEL BOYRAZ v. TURKEY 61960/08 SOLAK I. TUR 12/2/2014 12:00:00 AM Violation of Article 14 8 Prohibition of discrimination Article 14 Discrimination Article 8 Right to respect for private and family life Article 8 1 Respect for private life ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2014:1202JUD006196008https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-148271
CASE OF FOGARTY v. THE UNITED KINGDOM
CASE OF FOGARTY v. THE UNITED KINGDOM 37112/97 GBR 11/21/2001 12:00:00 AM No violation of Art. 6 1 No violation of Art. 14 6 State Immunity Act 1978 sections 1 1 and 16 1 a Sex Discrimination Act 1975 sections 1 1 4 1 and 6 Diplomatic Privileges Act 1964 ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2001:1121JUD003711297https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-59886
CASE OF GRANT v. THE UNITED KINGDOM
CASE OF GRANT v. THE UNITED KINGDOM 32570/03 SAWYER J. GBR 5/23/2006 12:00:00 AM Violation of Art. 8 No separate issue under Art. 14 P1 1 or P1 1 Pecuniary damage financial award Non pecuniary damage claim dismissed Costs and expenses partial award ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2006:0523JUD003257003https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-75454
CASE OF JURČIĆ v. CROATIA
CASE OF JUR I v. CROATIA 54711/15 JAJA K. HRV 2/4/2021 12:00:00 AM Violation of Article 14 P1 1 1 Prohibition of discrimination Article 14 Discrimination Article 1 of Protocol No. 1 Protection of property Article 1 para. 1 of Protocol No. 1 Peaceful ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2021:0204JUD005471115https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-207633
CASE OF KHAMTOKHU AND AKSENCHIK v. RUSSIA
CASE OF KHAMTOKHU AND AKSENCHIK v. RUSSIA 60367/08 961/11 YERMOLAYEVA N. MARALYAN A. DAVIDYAN E. MOSKALENKO K. RUS 1/24/2017 12:00:00 AM No violation of Article 14 5 Prohibition of discrimination Article 14 Discrimination Article 5 Right to liberty and ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2017:0124JUD006036708https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-170663
CASE OF KONSTANTIN MARKIN v. RUSSIA
CASE OF KONSTANTIN MARKIN v. RUSSIA 30078/06 MOSKALENKO K. LISMAN N GERASIMOVA I. RUS 3/22/2012 12:00:00 AM Preliminary objection dismissed Article 34 Victim Preliminary objection dismissed Article 37 1 b Matter resolved Remainder inadmissible Violation ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2012:0322JUD003007806https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-109868
CASE OF PETROV AND X v. RUSSIA
CASE OF PETROV AND X v. RUSSIA 23608/16 RUS 10/23/2018 12:00:00 AM Preliminary objection dismissed Art. 34 Individual applications Art. 34 Hinder the exercise of the right of application Preliminary objection joined to merits and dismissed Art. 34 ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2018:1023JUD002360816https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-187196
CASE OF PETROVIC v. AUSTRIA
CASE OF PETROVIC v. AUSTRIA 20458/92 N/A AUT 3/27/1998 12:00:00 AM No violation of Art. 14 8 Unemployment Benefit Act 1977 section 26 1 Federal law of 12 December 1989 343 100 464 238 451 ECLI:CE:ECHR:1998:0327JUD002045892 CASE OF PETROVIC v. AUSTRIA ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:1998:0327JUD002045892https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-58146
CASE OF STEC AND OTHERS v. THE UNITED KINGDOM
CASE OF STEC AND OTHERS v. THE UNITED KINGDOM 65731/01 65900/01 STARLING J. CLINCH J. GBR 4/12/2006 12:00:00 AM No violation of Art. 14 P1 1 Not necessary to examine victim status of third fourth and fifth applicants Social Security Contributions and ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2006:0412JUD006573101https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-73198
CASE OF VROUNTOU v. CYPRUS
CASE OF VROUNTOU v. CYPRUS 33631/06 CHRISTOPHI C. CYP 10/13/2015 12:00:00 AM Violation of Article 14 P1 1 1 Prohibition of discrimination Article 14 Discrimination Article 1 of Protocol No. 1 Protection of property Article 1 para. 1 of Protocol No. 1 ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2015:1013JUD003363106https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-158090
CASE OF WILLIS v. THE UNITED KINGDOM
CASE OF WILLIS v. THE UNITED KINGDOM 36042/97 N/A GBR 6/11/2002 12:00:00 AM Violation of Art. 14 P1 1 Not necessary to examine Art. 14 8 No violation of Art. 14 8 in connection with widow s pension Not necessary to examine Art. 14 8 or 14 P1 1 in ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2002:0611JUD003604297https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-60499
CASE OF X, Y AND Z v. THE UNITED KINGDOM
CASE OF X Y AND Z v. THE UNITED KINGDOM 21830/93 N/A GBR 4/22/1997 12:00:00 AM No violation of Art. 8 Not necessary to examine Art. 14 8 Human Fertility and Embryology Act 1990 section 28 3 Children Act 1989 sections 3 4 8 and 12 2 Births and Deaths ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:1997:0422JUD002183093https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-58032
CASE OF Y AND OTHERS v. BULGARIA
CASE OF Y AND OTHERS v. BULGARIA 9077/18 KACHAUNOVA A. BGR 3/22/2022 12:00:00 AM Violation of Article 2 Right to life Article 2 Positive obligations Article 2 1 Life Substantive aspect No violation of Article 14 2 1 Prohibition of discrimination Article ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2022:0322JUD000907718https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-216360
CASE OF YOCHEVA AND GANEVA v. BULGARIA
CASE OF YOCHEVA AND GANEVA v. BULGARIA 18592/15 43863/15 MARCHEVA D. BORISOV P. BGR 5/11/2021 12:00:00 AM Preliminary objection dismissed Art. 35 Admissibility criteria Art. 35 3 b No significant disadvantage Remainder inadmissible Art. 35 Admissibility ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2021:0511JUD001859215https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-209866
CASE OF ZARB ADAMI v. MALTA
CASE OF ZARB ADAMI v. MALTA 17209/02 REFALO I. MLT 6/20/2006 12:00:00 AM Violation of Art. 14 4 3 d Not necessary to examine Art. 14 6 Pecuniary damage claim dismissed Non pecuniary damage finding of violation sufficient Costs and expenses award domestic ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2006:0620JUD001720902https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-75934