Search
Data source
EU member states
Other countries
Keywords
Tags
Displaying 61 - 80 of 1880
Baumgarten v. Germany
Baumgarten v. Germany CCPR/C/78/D/960/2000 Communication number s : 960/2000 Author: Klaus Dieter Baumgarten Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 78 Country Germany Submission date 30 Sep 1998 Date of decision 31 Jul 2003 Comment: The Covenant JUTBCCPR/C/78/D/960/2000https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1061/en-US
Bleier v. Uruguay
Bleier v. Uruguay CCPR/C/15/D/30/1978 Communication number s : 030/1978 Author: Irene Bleier Lewenhoff and Rosa Valino de Bleier alleged victim s daughter and wife respectively Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 15 Country Uruguay Submission JUTBCCPR/C/15/D/30/1978https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/575/en-US
Bobrov v. Belarus
Bobrov v. Belarus CCPR/C/122/D/2181/2012 Communication number s : 2181/2012 Author: Egor Bobrov Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 122 Country Belarus Submission date 17 Nov 2010 Date of decision 27 Mar 2018 Comment: This document has no JUTBCCPR/C/122/D/2181/2012https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2438/en-US
Bronson Blessington and Matthew Elliot v. Australia
Bronson Blessington and Matthew Elliot v. Australia CCPR/C/112/D/1968/2010 Communication number s : 1968/2010 Author: Bronson Blessington and Matthew Elliot represented by Human Rights Law Centre Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 112 Country JUTBCCPR/C/112/D/1968/2010https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1890/en-US
Brun v. France
Brun v. France CCPR/C/88/D/1453/2006 Communication number s : 1453/2006 Author: Andr Brun Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 88 Country France Submission date 15 Nov 2005 Date of decision 18 Oct 2006 Comment: Pursuant to rule 90 of the JUTBCCPR/C/88/D/1453/2006https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1319/en-US
Buffo Carballal v. Uruguay
Buffo Carballal v. Uruguay CCPR/C/12/D/33/1978 Communication number s : 033/1978 Author: Leopoldo Buffo Carballal Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 12 Country Uruguay Submission date 30 May 1978 Date of decision 27 Mar 1981 Comment: This JUTBCCPR/C/12/D/33/1978https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/648/en-US
Burdyko v. Belarus
Burdyko v. Belarus CCPR/C/114/D/2017/2010 Communication number s : 2017/2010 Author: Andrei Burdyko Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 114 Country Belarus Submission date 17 Dec 2010 Date of decision 15 Jul 2015 Comment: This document has no JUTBCCPR/C/114/D/2017/2010https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1977/en-US
Byahuranga v. Denmark
Byahuranga v. Denmark CCPR/C/82/D/1222/2003 Communication number s : 1222/2003 Author: Jonny Rubin Byahuranga Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 82 Country Denmark Submission date 15 Aug 2003 Date of decision 01 Nov 2004 Comment: The JUTBCCPR/C/82/D/1222/2003https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1148/en-US
C.F. et al. v. Canada
C.F. et al. v. Canada CCPR/C/24/D/113/1981 Communication number s : 113/1981 Author: C.F. M.L and J. L.L. Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 24 Country Canada Submission date 10 Dec 1981 Date of decision 12 Apr 1985 Comment: earlier JUTBCCPR/C/24/D/113/1981https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/366/en-US
C.O.D. v. Chile
C.O.D. v. Chile CRC/C/92/D/129/2020 Communication number s : 129/2020 Author: C.O.D. Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 92 Country Chile Submission date 27 Sep 2020 Date of decision 25 Jan 2023 Comment: This document has no comment: JUTBCRC/C/92/D/129/2020https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/3748/en-US
CANTAFIO v. Italy
CANTAFIO v. Italy ITA 26/09/1995 00:00:00 28/11/2016 11:43:17 Case Description: Access to and effective functioning of justice: Denial of access to a court in order to resolve a dispute dating from 1986 with the Municipality of Decollatura since the EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-45090
CASE OF A AND B v. ROMANIA
CASE OF A AND B v. ROMANIA 48442/16 48831/16 DRAGOMIR D. E. ROU 6/2/2020 12:00:00 AM Preliminary objections dismissed Art. 35 Admissibility criteria Art. 35 1 Exhaustion of domestic remedies Art. 35 3 a Abuse of the right of application No violation of ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2020:0602JUD004844216https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-202621
CASE OF A, B AND C v. IRELAND
CASE OF A B AND C v. IRELAND 25579/05 KAY J. IRL 12/16/2010 12:00:00 AM Preliminary objection joined to merits and dismissed non exhaustion of domestic remedies Remainder inadmissible No violation of Art. 8 Violation of Art. 8 Non pecuniary damage award ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2010:1216JUD002557905https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-102332
CASE OF A.D.T. v. THE UNITED KINGDOM
CASE OF A.D.T. v. THE UNITED KINGDOM 35765/97 N/A GBR 7/31/2000 12:00:00 AM Violation of Art. 8 Not necessary to examine Art. 14 Pecuniary damage financial award Non pecuniary damage financial award Costs and expenses award Sexual Offences Act 1956 ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2000:0731JUD003576597https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-58922
CASE OF A.H. AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA
CASE OF A.H. AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA 6033/13 8927/13 10549/13 12275/13 23890/13 26309/13 27161/13 29197/13 32224/13 32331/13 32351/13 32368/13 37173/13 38490/13 42340/13 42403/13 INTERNATIONAL PROTECTION CENTRE IN MOSCOW O REAR I. RUS 1/17/2017 12:00:00 AM ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2017:0117JUD000603313https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-170390
CASE OF AÇIK AND OTHERS v. TURKEY
CASE OF A IK AND OTHERS v. TURKEY 31451/03 OCAK A.T. TUR 1/13/2009 12:00:00 AM Violation of Article 3 Prohibition of torture Violation of Article 10 Freedom of expression General 350 149 ECLI:CE:ECHR:2009:0113JUD003145103 SECOND SECTION CASE OF A IK AND ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2009:0113JUD003145103https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-90596
CASE OF A.K. AND L. v. CROATIA
CASE OF A.K. AND L. v. CROATIA 37956/11 KUSAN L. HRV 1/8/2013 12:00:00 AM Violation of Article 8 Right to respect for private and family life Article 8 1 Respect for family life Non pecuniary damage award Sections 114 4 5 and 6 and 267 of the Family Act ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2013:0108JUD003795611https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-115868
CASE OF A.M. v. NORWAY
CASE OF A.M. v. NORWAY 30254/18 ANDRESEN K.S.S. NOR 3/24/2022 12:00:00 AM Remainder inadmissible Art. 35 Admissibility criteria Art. 35 1 Exhaustion of domestic remedies No violation of Article 8 Right to respect for private and family life Article 8 1 ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2022:0324JUD003025418https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-216348
CASE OF A.M. v. THE NETHERLANDS
CASE OF A.M. v. THE NETHERLANDS 29094/09 TER MEULEN MOUWEN E. NLD 7/5/2016 12:00:00 AM Preliminary objection joined to merits and dismissed Article 35 1 Exhaustion of domestic remedies Remainder inadmissible No violation of Article 13 3 Right to an ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2016:0705JUD002909409https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-164460
CASE OF A.P., M.P. AND T.P. v. SWITZERLAND
CASE OF A.P. M.P. AND T.P. v. SWITZERLAND 19958/92 N/A CHE 8/29/1997 12:00:00 AM Violation of Art. 6 2 Not necessary to examine Art. 6 1 Not necessary to examine Art. 6 3 Costs and expenses award Convention proceedings Ordinance on Direct Federal Tax ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:1997:0829JUD001995892https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-58178