Search
Data source
EU member states
Other countries
Keywords
Tags
Displaying 1 - 20 of 239
A.U. and H.R. v. New Zealand
A.U. and H.R. v. New Zealand CCPR/C/118/D/2567/2015 Communication number s : 2567/2015 Author: A.U. and H.R. Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 118 Country New Zealand Submission date Date of decision Comment: This document has no JUTBCCPR/C/118/D/2567/2015https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2233/en-US
Additional Protocol to the Convention for the Protection of Individuals with regard to Automatic Processing of Personal Data, regarding supervisory authorities and transborder data flows (ETS No. 181)
Additional Protocol to the Convention for the Protection of Individuals with regard to Automatic Processing of Personal Data regarding supervisory authorities and transborder data flows ETS No. 181 181 Strasbourg 2001 11 08T00:00:00 Treaty open for COEETS No. 181https://rm.coe.int/1680080626
Additional Protocol to the Convention on Human Rights and Biomedicine concerning Genetic Testing for Health Purposes (CETS No. 203)
Additional Protocol to the Convention on Human Rights and Biomedicine concerning Genetic Testing for Health Purposes CETS No. 203 203 Strasbourg 2008 11 27T00:00:00 Treaty open for signature by the Signatories to Treaty ETS 164 Strasbourg 2018 07 COECETS No. 203https://rm.coe.int/1680084824
BELARUS: CONCLUDING OBSERVATIONS
BELARUS: CONCLUDING OBSERVATIONS E/C.12/BLR/CO/4 6 NULL 2013 12 12T00:00:00 CESCR United Nations E/C.12/BLR/CO/4 6 Economic and Social Council Distr.: General 13 December 2013 Original: English Committee on Economic Social and Cultural Rights Concluding UHRIE/C.12/BLR/CO/4-6https://uhri.ohchr.org/en/document/92696eeb-1674-49e1-befc-fa63611f61d8
BELL v. Belgium
BELL v. Belgium BEL 06/04/2009 00:00:00 25/10/2016 12:18:05 Case Description: The Dumont group concerning the excessive length of judicial proceedings civil and criminal was closed 17 cases in December 2015 CM/ResDH 2015 245 . The examination of general EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-1201
Bailey (Everton) v. Jamaica
Bailey Everton v. Jamaica CCPR/C/66/D/709/1996 Communication number s : 709/1996 Author: Everton Bailey Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 66 Country Jamaica Submission date 23 Apr 1996 Date of decision 21 Jul 1999 Comment: Individual opinion JUTBCCPR/C/66/D/709/1996https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/793/en-US
Bakhtiyari v. Australia
Bakhtiyari v. Australia CCPR/C/79/D/1069/2002 Communication number s : 1069/2002 Author: Ali Aqsar Bakhtiyari and Roqaiha Bakhtiyari Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 79 Country Australia Submission date 25 Mar 2002 Date of decision 29 Oct JUTBCCPR/C/79/D/1069/2002https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1092/en-US
CASE OF A.M. v. NORWAY
CASE OF A.M. v. NORWAY 30254/18 ANDRESEN K.S.S. NOR 3/24/2022 12:00:00 AM Remainder inadmissible Art. 35 Admissibility criteria Art. 35 1 Exhaustion of domestic remedies No violation of Article 8 Right to respect for private and family life Article 8 1 ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2022:0324JUD003025418https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-216348
CASE OF ABDULAZIZ, CABALES AND BALKANDALI v. THE UNITED KINGDOM
CASE OF ABDULAZIZ CABALES AND BALKANDALI v. THE UNITED KINGDOM 9214/80 9473/81 9474/81 N/A GBR 5/28/1985 12:00:00 AM Violation of Art. 14 8 Violation of Art. 13 Non pecuniary damage finding of violation sufficient Costs and expenses award Convention ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:1985:0528JUD000921480https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-57416
CASE OF AL-DULIMI AND MONTANA MANAGEMENT INC. v. SWITZERLAND
CASE OF AL DULIMI AND MONTANA MANAGEMENT INC. v. SWITZERLAND 5809/08 MICHEL J. C. OBEIDAT T. FRIES S. CHE 6/21/2016 12:00:00 AM Preliminary objection dismissed Art. 35 Admissibility criteria Art. 35 3 a Ratione personae Preliminary objection dismissed ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2016:0621JUD000580908https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-164515
CASE OF ALIM v. RUSSIA
CASE OF ALIM v. RUSSIA 39417/07 YEREMENKO V. N. RUS 9/27/2011 12:00:00 AM No violation of Art. 5 1 f Violation of Art. 8 in case of expulsion from Russia Remainder inadmissible Non pecuniary damage award Article 18.8 of the Code of Administrative Offences ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2011:0927JUD003941707https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-106427
CASE OF AMANN v. SWITZERLAND
CASE OF AMANN v. SWITZERLAND 27798/95 N/A CHE 2/16/2000 12:00:00 AM Violation of Art. 8 with regard to interception of telephone call Violation of Art. 8 with regard to creation and storing of information card Preliminary objection dismissed Non pecuniary ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2000:0216JUD002779895https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-58497
CASE OF BĂRBULESCU v. ROMANIA
CASE OF B RBULESCU v. ROMANIA 61496/08 DOMOKOS HANCU E. JUVERDEANU O. ROU 9/5/2017 12:00:00 AM Violation of Article 8 Right to respect for private and family life Article 8 1 Respect for correspondence Respect for private life Pecuniary damage claim ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2017:0905JUD006149608https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-177082
CASE OF BĂRBULESCU v. ROMANIA
CASE OF B RBULESCU v. ROMANIA 61496/08 COSTINESCU D. JUVERDEANU O. ROU 1/12/2016 12:00:00 AM Remainder inadmissible No violation of Article 8 Right to respect for private and family life Article 8 Positive obligations Article 8 1 Respect for ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2016:0112JUD006149608https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-159906
CASE OF B. v. FRANCE
CASE OF B. v. FRANCE 13343/87 N/A FRA 3/25/1992 12:00:00 AM Preliminary objection rejected non exhaustion Preliminary objection rejected six month period Violation of Art. 8 Not necessary to examine Art. 3 Non pecuniary damage financial award Pecuniary ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:1992:0325JUD001334387https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-57770
CASE OF BAKA v. HUNGARY
CASE OF BAKA v. HUNGARY 20261/12 CECH A. HUN 6/23/2016 12:00:00 AM Violation of Article 6 Right to a fair trial Article 6 Civil proceedings Article 6 1 Access to court Civil rights and obligations Determination civil Violation of Article 10 Freedom of ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2016:0623JUD002026112https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-163113
CASE OF BECK, COPP AND BAZELEY v. THE UNITED KINGDOM
CASE OF BECK COPP AND BAZELEY v. THE UNITED KINGDOM 48535/99 48536/99 48537/99 GBR 10/22/2002 12:00:00 AM Violation of Art. 8 No separate issue under Art. 14 8 No violation of Art. 3 No violation of Art. 14 3 Not necessary to examine Art. 10 Not necessary ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2002:1022JUD004853599https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-60697
CASE OF BELKA v. POLAND
CASE OF BELKA v. POLAND 20870/04 N/A POL 5/18/2010 12:00:00 AM Violation of Art. 6 1 445 ECLI:CE:ECHR:2010:0518JUD002087004 FOURTH SECTION CASE OF BELKA v. POLAND Application no. 20870/04 JUDGMENT STRASBOURG 18 May 2010 FINAL 18/08/2010 This judgment has ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2010:0518JUD002087004https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-98543
CASE OF BENEDIK v. SLOVENIA
CASE OF BENEDIK v. SLOVENIA 62357/14 JELENIC NOVAK M. SVN 4/24/2018 12:00:00 AM Preliminary objection joined to merits and dismissed Art. 34 Individual applications Art. 34 Victim Remainder inadmissible Art. 35 Admissibility criteria Art. 35 1 Exhaustion ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2018:0424JUD006235714https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-182455
CASE OF BERNH LARSEN HOLDING AS AND OTHERS v. NORWAY
CASE OF BERNH LARSEN HOLDING AS AND OTHERS v. NORWAY 24117/08 HATLAND T. NOR 3/14/2013 12:00:00 AM No violation of Article 8 Right to respect for private and family life Article 8 1 Respect for correspondence Respect for home Section 3 5 1 3 6 1 and sub ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2013:0314JUD002411708https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-117133