Search
Data source
EU member states
Other countries
Keywords
Tags
Displaying 2061 - 2080 of 2493
Petit v. France
Petit v. France CCPR/C/90/D/1384/2005 Communication number s : 1384/2005 Author: Robert and Marie Fran oise Petit Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 90 Country France Submission date 01 Nov 2004 Date of decision 24 Jul 2007 Comment: JUTBCCPR/C/90/D/1384/2005https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1401/en-US
Petrovets v. Belarus
Petrovets v. Belarus CCPR/C/125/D/2333/2014 Communication number s : 2333/2014 Author: Ilya Petrovets Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 125 Country Belarus Submission date 04 Jan 2013 Date of decision 29 Mar 2019 Comment: This document has JUTBCCPR/C/125/D/2333/2014https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/3106/en-US
Pham v. Canada
Pham v. Canada CCPR/C/93/D/1534/2006 Communication number s : 1534/2006 Author: The Trinh Pham Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 93 Country Canada Submission date 18 Jul 2006 Date of decision 22 Jul 2008 Comment: This document has no JUTBCCPR/C/93/D/1534/2006https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1009/en-US
Picq v. France
Picq v. France CCPR/C/94/D/1632/2007 Communication number s : 1632/2007 Author: Raymond Jacques Picq Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 94 Country France Submission date 28 May 2007 Date of decision 30 Oct 2008 Comment: Pursuant to rule JUTBCCPR/C/94/D/1632/2007https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1023/en-US
Pietraroia v. Uruguay
Pietraroia v. Uruguay CCPR/C/12/D/44/1979 Communication number s : 044/1979 Author: Alba Pietraroia alleged victim s daughter Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 12 Country Uruguay Submission date 01 Jan 1979 Date of decision 27 Mar 1981 JUTBCCPR/C/12/D/44/1979https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/622/en-US
Pinkney v. Canada
Pinkney v. Canada CCPR/C/14/D/27/1977 Communication number s : 027/1977 Author: Larry James Pinkney Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 14 Country Canada Submission date 25 Nov 1977 Date of decision 29 Oct 1981 Comment: This document has no JUTBCCPR/C/14/D/27/1977https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/458/en-US
Poma Poma v. Peru
Poma Poma v. Peru CCPR/C/95/D/1457/2006 Communication number s : 1457/2006 Author: ngela Poma Poma Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 95 Country Peru Submission date 28 Dec 2004 Date of decision 27 Mar 2009 Comment: In accordance with rule 90 JUTBCCPR/C/95/D/1457/2006https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1495/en-US
Pratt and Morgan v. Jamaica
Pratt and Morgan v. Jamaica CCPR/C/35/D/210/1986 Communication number s : 210/1986 225/1987 Author: Earl Pratt Ivan Morgan Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 35 Country Jamaica Submission date 12 Jan 1986 Date of decision 06 Apr 1989 Comment: JUTBCCPR/C/35/D/210/1986https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/308/en-US
Prince v. South Africa
Prince v. South Africa CCPR/C/91/D/1474/2006 Communication number s : 1474/2006 Author: Gareth Anver Prince Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 91 Country South Africa Submission date 20 Oct 2005 Date of decision 31 Oct 2007 Comment: This JUTBCCPR/C/91/D/1474/2006https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1380/en-US
Protocol No. 4 to the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms, securing certain rights and freedoms other than those already included in the Convention and in the first Protocol thereto (ETS No. 046)
Protocol No. 4 to the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms securing certain rights and freedoms other than those already included in the Convention and in the first Protocol thereto ETS No. 046 046 Strasbourg 1963 09 COEETS No. 046https://rm.coe.int/168006b65c
Protocol No. 6 to the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms concerning the Abolition of the Death Penalty (ETS No. 114)
Protocol No. 6 to the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms concerning the Abolition of the Death Penalty ETS No. 114 114 Strasbourg 1983 04 28T00:00:00 Treaty open for signature by the member States signatories to Treaty COEETS No. 114https://rm.coe.int/168007952b
Protocol to the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms (ETS No. 009)
Protocol to the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms ETS No. 009 009 Paris 1952 03 20T00:00:00 Treaty open for signature by the member States signatories to Treaty ETS 5 Paris 1954 05 18T00:00:00 10 Ratifications. The COEETS No. 009https://rm.coe.int/168006377c
Quispe Roque v. Peru
Quispe Roque v. Peru CCPR/C/85/D/1125/2002 Communication number s : 1125/2002 Author: Jorge Luis Quispe Roque Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 85 Country Peru Submission date 17 Jul 2002 Date of decision 21 Oct 2005 Comment: This document JUTBCCPR/C/85/D/1125/2002https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1234/en-US
R.C. v. France
R.C. v. France CCPR/C/109/D/1923/2009 Communication number s : 1923/2009 Author: R.C. Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 109 Country France Submission date 04 Aug 2009 Date of decision 28 Oct 2013 Comment: Pursuant to rule 90 of the JUTBCCPR/C/109/D/1923/2009https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1680/en-US
R.L. et al. (Whispering Pines Band) v. Canada
R.L. et al. Whispering Pines Band v. Canada CCPR/C/43/D/358/1989 Communication number s : 358/1989 Author: R.L. M.B. M.H. names deleted and 14 other members of the Whispering Pines Band Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 43 Country JUTBCCPR/C/43/D/358/1989https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/638/en-US
R.M. v. Sweden
R.M. v. Sweden CAT/C/59/D/610/2014 Communication number s : 610/2014 Author: R.M. Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 59 Country Sweden Submission date 06 Jun 2014 Date of decision 30 Nov 2016 Comment: This document has no comment: JUTBCAT/C/59/D/610/2014https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2146/en-US
R.P.B. v. Philippines
R.P.B. v. Philippines CEDAW/C/57/D/34/2011 Communication number s : 034/2011 Author: R.P.B. represented by counsel Evalyn G. Ursua and Maria Karla L. Espinosa Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 57 Country Philippines Submission date 23 May JUTBCEDAW/C/57/D/34/2011https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1875/en-US
R.P. v. Netherlands
R.P. v. Netherlands CAT/C/62/D/696/2015 Communication number s : 696/2015 Author: R.P. represented by counsel Rabinderdei Nandoe Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 62 Country Netherlands Submission date 27 Jul 2015 Date of decision 04 JUTBCAT/C/62/D/696/2015https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2416/en-US
R.S. v. Trinidad and Tobago
R.S. v. Trinidad and Tobago CCPR/C/74/D/684/1996 Communication number s : 684/1996 Author: R.S. Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 74 Country Trinidad and Tobago Submission date 13 Mar 1996 Date of decision 02 Apr 2002 Comment: The Committee JUTBCCPR/C/74/D/684/1996https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/954/en-US
RADU v. the Republic of Moldova
RADU v. the Republic of Moldova MDA 15/07/2014 00:00:00 02/11/2016 10:38:31 Case Description: Protection of private life: Unlawful interference on account of the disclosure of information of a medical nature by a medical institution to a person s employer EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-6876