Search
Data source
EU member states
Other countries
Keywords
Tags
Displaying 1421 - 1440 of 2751
CASE OF ROSENZWEIG AND BONDED WAREHOUSES LTD. v. POLAND
CASE OF ROSENZWEIG AND BONDED WAREHOUSES LTD. v. POLAND 51728/99 SZAJ W. SCHMITZ K. H. POL 7/28/2005 12:00:00 AM Violation of P1 1 Just satisfaction reserved 369 62 ECLI:CE:ECHR:2005:0728JUD005172899 THIRD SECTION CASE OF ROSENZWEIG AND BONDED WAREHOUSES ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2005:0728JUD005172899https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-69939
CASE OF ROSINSKI v. POLAND
CASE OF ROSINSKI v. POLAND 17373/02 N/A POL 7/17/2007 12:00:00 AM Preliminary objections dismissed ratione temporis ratione materiae non exhaustion of domestic remedies Non pecuniary damage financial award Violation of P1 1 Local Planning Acts 1984 1994 ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2007:0717JUD001737302https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-81737
CASE OF ROTH v. GERMANY
CASE OF ROTH v. GERMANY 6780/18 30776/18 THENHAUSEN D. DEU 10/22/2020 12:00:00 AM Preliminary objection joined to merits and dismissed Art. 34 Individual applications Art. 34 Victim Violation of Article 3 Prohibition of torture Article 3 Degrading ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2020:1022JUD000678018https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-205178
CASE OF ROUSK v. SWEDEN
CASE OF ROUSK v. SWEDEN 27183/04 THORNHAMMAR J. SWE 7/25/2013 12:00:00 AM Remainder inadmissible Violation of Article 1 of Protocol No. 1 Protection of property Article 1 para. 2 of Protocol No. 1 Control of the use of property Violation of Article 8 ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2013:0725JUD002718304https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-123422
CASE OF ROWE AND DAVIS v. THE UNITED KINGDOM
CASE OF ROWE AND DAVIS v. THE UNITED KINGDOM 28901/95 N/A GBR 2/16/2000 12:00:00 AM Violation of Art. 6 1 Non pecuniary damage finding of violation sufficient Costs and expenses partial award Convention proceedings Attorney General s Guidelines 1981 1982 ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2000:0216JUD002890195https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-58496
CASE OF RTBF v. BELGIUM
CASE OF RTBF v. BELGIUM 50084/06 ENGLEBERT J. BEL 3/29/2011 12:00:00 AM Violation of Art. 6 1 Violation of Art. 10 Pecuniary and non pecuniary damage finding of violation sufficient 445 40 7 14 128 149 148 158 265 316 140 452 216 ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2011:0329JUD005008406https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-104265
CASE OF RUBINAT v. ITALY
CASE OF RUBINAT v. ITALY 9317/81 ITA 2/12/1985 12:00:00 AM Struck out of the list solution of the matter 445 136 ECLI:CE:ECHR:1985:0212JUD000931781 In the Rubinat case The case is numbered 7B/1983/63/98. The second figure indicates theyear in which the ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:1985:0212JUD000931781https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-57568
CASE OF RUIZ-MATEOS v. SPAIN
CASE OF RUIZ MATEOS v. SPAIN 12952/87 N/A ESP 6/23/1993 12:00:00 AM Violation of Art. 6 1 Pecuniary damage claim dismissed Constitution Articles 14 24 33 161 1 163 164 Institutional Law no. 2/1979 on the Constitutional Court Articles 35 36 37 Law no. ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:1993:0623JUD001295287https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-57838
CASE OF RUOTOLO v. ITALY
CASE OF RUOTOLO v. ITALY 12460/86 N/A ITA 2/27/1992 12:00:00 AM Violation of Article 6 Right to a fair trial Article 6 Civil proceedings Article 6 1 Reasonable time Pecuniary damage claim dismissed Article 41 Pecuniary damage Just satisfaction Non ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:1992:0227JUD001246086https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-57756
CASE OF RUSLAN YAKOVENKO v. UKRAINE
CASE OF RUSLAN YAKOVENKO v. UKRAINE 5425/11 LEVYTSKYY O.V. UKR 6/4/2015 12:00:00 AM Violation of Article 5 Right to liberty and security Article 5 1 Lawful arrest or detention Article 5 1 a After conviction Violation of Article 2 of Protocol No. 7 Right ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2015:0604JUD000542511https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-154978
CASE OF RUSTAMOV v. RUSSIA
CASE OF RUSTAMOV v. RUSSIA 11209/10 KHADISOV Kh. M. RUS 7/3/2012 12:00:00 AM Remainder inadmissible Violation of Article 3 Prohibition of torture Article 3 Extradition Conditional Uzbekistan No violation of Article 5 Right to liberty and security Article ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2012:0703JUD001120910https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-111841
CASE OF RUSTAVI 2 BROADCASTING COMPANY LTD AND OTHERS v. GEORGIA
CASE OF RUSTAVI 2 BROADCASTING COMPANY LTD AND OTHERS v. GEORGIA 16812/17 MURADASHVILI T. SADZAGLISHVILI D. GEO 7/18/2019 12:00:00 AM Remainder inadmissible Art. 35 Admissibility criteria Art. 35 1 Six month period Art. 35 3 a Manifestly ill founded Art. ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2019:0718JUD001681217https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-194445
CASE OF RYAKIB BIRYUKOV v. RUSSIA
CASE OF RYAKIB BIRYUKOV v. RUSSIA 14810/02 CHEBOTARENKO A. RUS 1/17/2008 12:00:00 AM Violation of Art. 6 1 Pecuniary damage claim dismissed Non pecuniary damage finding of violation sufficient Article 1064 of the Civil Code Article 203 of the Code of ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2008:0117JUD001481002https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-84452
CASE OF RYBCZYNSCY v. POLAND
CASE OF RYBCZYNSCY v. POLAND 3501/02 N/A POL 10/3/2006 12:00:00 AM Violation of Art. 6 1 length Remainder inadmissible Pecuniary damage claim dismissed Non pecuniary damage financial award Costs and expenses domestic proceedings claim dismissed Costs and ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2006:1003JUD000350102https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-77044
CASE OF S.A. DANGEVILLE v. FRANCE
CASE OF S.A. DANGEVILLE v. FRANCE 36677/97 N/A FRA 4/16/2002 12:00:00 AM Violation of P1 1 Not necessary to examine Art. 14 P1 1 Pecuniary damage financial award Non pecuniary damage finding of violation sufficient Costs and expenses award domestic ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2002:0416JUD003667797https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-60432
CASE OF S.C. FIERCOLECT IMPEX S.R.L. v. ROMANIA
CASE OF S.C. FIERCOLECT IMPEX S.R.L. v. ROMANIA 26429/07 CHIRITA R. ROU 12/13/2016 12:00:00 AM Remainder inadmissible Article 35 3 a Manifestly ill founded No violation of Article 1 of Protocol No. 1 Protection of property Article 1 para. 1 of Protocol ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2016:1213JUD002642907https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-169468
CASE OF S.C. SERVICE BENZ COM S.R.L. v. ROMANIA
CASE OF S.C. SERVICE BENZ COM S.R.L. v. ROMANIA 58045/11 MARZAVAN M.E. ROU 7/4/2017 12:00:00 AM No violation of Article 1 of Protocol No. 1 Protection of property Article 1 para. 1 of Protocol No. 1 Peaceful enjoyment of possessions 369 304 ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2017:0704JUD005804511https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-174993
CASE OF SÖDERBÄCK v. SWEDEN
CASE OF S DERB CK v. SWEDEN 24484/94 N/A SWE 10/28/1998 12:00:00 AM No violation of Art. 8 Parental Code Chapter 4 section 6 451 425 ECLI:CE:ECHR:1998:1028JUD002448494 CASE OF S DERB CK v. SWEDEN 113/1997/897/1109 JUDGMENT STRASBOURG 28 October 1998 In ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:1998:1028JUD002448494https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-58254
CASE OF S.H.K. v. BULGARIA
CASE OF S.H.K. v. BULGARIA 37355/97 BGR 10/23/2003 12:00:00 AM Violation of Art. 6 1 Pecuniary damage claim dismissed Non pecuniary damage financial award Costs and expenses claim dismissed 445 406 76 216 ECLI:CE:ECHR:2003:1023JUD003735597 FIRST SECTION ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2003:1023JUD003735597https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-61382
CASE OF S.L. AND J.L. v. CROATIA
CASE OF S.L. AND J.L. v. CROATIA 13712/11 STOK L. HRV 5/7/2015 12:00:00 AM Preliminary objection joined to merits and dismissed Article 35 1 Exhaustion of domestic remedies Violation of Article 1 of Protocol No. 1 Protection of property Article 1 of ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2015:0507JUD001371211https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-154162