Search
Data source
EU member states
Other countries
Keywords
Tags
Displaying 2821 - 2840 of 2905
Svetlana Zhuk v. Belarus
Svetlana Zhuk v. Belarus CCPR/C/109/D/1910/2009 Communication number s : 1910/2009 Author: Svetlana Zhuk Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 109 Country Belarus Submission date 27 Oct 2009 Date of decision 30 Oct 2013 Comment: This document JUTBCCPR/C/109/D/1910/2009https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1689/en-US
T.D.J. v. Denmark
T.D.J. v. Denmark CCPR/C/127/D/2654/2015 Communication number s : 2654/2015 Author: T.D.J. Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 127 Country Denmark Submission date 05 Oct 2015 Date of decision 08 Nov 2019 Comment: This document has no JUTBCCPR/C/127/D/2654/2015https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2813/en-US
T.N. v. Denmark
T.N. v. Denmark CEDAW/C/59/D/37/2012 Communication number s : 037/2012 Author: T.N. represented by counsel Tyge Trier Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 59 Country Denmark Submission date 19 Sep 2011 Date of decision 03 Nov 2014 JUTBCEDAW/C/59/D/37/2012https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1880/en-US
Thabti v. Tunisia
Thabti v. Tunisia CAT/C/31/D/187/2001 Communication number s : 187/2001 Author: Dhaou Belgacem Thabti Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 31 Country Tunisia Submission date 01 Jun 2000 Date of decision 14 Nov 2003 Comment: This document has no JUTBCAT/C/31/D/187/2001https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/166/en-US
The Jewish community of Oslo et al. v. Norway
The Jewish community of Oslo et al. v. Norway CERD/C/67/D/30/2003 Communication number s : 030/2003 Author: The Jewish community of Oslo the Jewish community of Trondheim Rolf Kirchner Julius Paltiel the Norwegian Antiracist Centre and Nadeem Butt Type of JUTBCERD/C/67/D/30/2003https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1740/en-US
Third Additional Protocol to the European Convention on Extradition (CETS No. 209)
Third Additional Protocol to the European Convention on Extradition CETS No. 209 209 Strasbourg 2010 11 10T00:00:00 Treaty open for signature by the member States of the Council of Europe which are Parties to or which have signed the treaty ETS 24 and for COECETS No. 209https://rm.coe.int/168008482c
Third Evaluation Round Evaluation Report on Germany on Incriminations (ETS 173 and 191, GPC 2) (Theme I)
Third Evaluation Round Evaluation Report on Germany on Incriminations ETS 173 and 191 GPC 2 Theme I DEU 2009 12 04 2009 12 04 Directorate General of Human Rights and Legal Affairs Directorate of Monitoring Strasbourg 4 December 2009 Public Greco Eval III GRECOGreco-Eval-III-Rep-2009-3E-Final-Germany-173-PUBLIChttps://hudoc.greco.coe.int/eng?i=Greco-Eval-III-Rep-2009-3E-Final-Germany-173-PUBLIC
Third Evaluation Round Evaluation Report on Germany on Transparency of Party Funding (Theme II)
Third Evaluation Round Evaluation Report on Germany on Transparency of Party Funding Theme II DEU 2009 12 04 2009 12 04 Directorate General of Human Rights and Legal Affairs Directorate of Monitoring Strasbourg 4 December 2009 Public Greco Eval III Rep GRECOGreco-Eval-III-Rep-2009-3E-Final-Germany-PF-PUBLIChttps://hudoc.greco.coe.int/eng?i=Greco-Eval-III-Rep-2009-3E-Final-Germany-PF-PUBLIC
Third Evaluation Round Evaluation Report on Italy Incriminations (ETS 173 and 191, GPC 2) (Theme I)
Third Evaluation Round Evaluation Report on Italy Incriminations ETS 173 and 191 GPC 2 Theme I ITA 2012 03 23 2012 04 11 Strasbourg 23 March 2012 Public Greco Eval III Rep 2011 7E Theme I Third Evaluation Round Evaluation Report on Italy Incriminations GRECOGreco-Eval-III-Rep-2011-7E-Final-Italy-173-PUBLIChttps://hudoc.greco.coe.int/eng?i=Greco-Eval-III-Rep-2011-7E-Final-Italy-173-PUBLIC
Third Evaluation Round Evaluation Report on Turkey on Transparency of Party Funding (Theme II)
Third Evaluation Round Evaluation Report on Turkey on Transparency of Party Funding Theme II TUR 2010 03 26 2010 04 10 Directorate General of Human Rights and Legal Affairs Directorate of Monitoring Strasbourg 26 March 2010 Public Greco Eval III Rep 2009 GRECOGreco-Eval-III-Rep-2009-5E-Final-Turkey-PF-PUBLIChttps://hudoc.greco.coe.int/eng?i=Greco-Eval-III-Rep-2009-5E-Final-Turkey-PF-PUBLIC
Third Evaluation Round Evaluation Report on the United Kingdom on Transparency of Party Funding (Theme II)
Third Evaluation Round Evaluation Report on the United Kingdom on Transparency of Party Funding Theme II GBR 2008 02 15 2008 04 03 Directorate General of Human Rights and Legal Affairs Directorate of Monitoring Strasbourg 15 February 2008 Public Greco GRECOGreco-Eval-III-Rep-2007-3E-Final-United-Kingdom-PF-PUBLIChttps://hudoc.greco.coe.int/eng?i=Greco-Eval-III-Rep-2007-3E-Final-United-Kingdom-PF-PUBLIC
Third Opinion on the United Kingdom
Third Opinion on the United Kingdom GBR ACFC/OP/III 2011 006 2011 06 30 Strasbourg 22 December 2011 Public ACFC/OP/III 2011 006 ADVISORY COMMITTEE ON THE FRAMEWORK CONVENTION FOR THE PROTECTION OF NATIONAL MINORITIES Third Opinion on the United Kingdom FCNMACFC/OP/III(2011)006https://hudoc.fcnm.coe.int/eng?i=3rd_OP_UnitedKingdom_en
Third report on Belgium
Third report on Belgium BEL 2003 06 27 2004 01 27 CRI 2004 1 Third report on Belgium Adopted on 27 June 2003 Strasbourg 27 January 2004 For further information about the work of the European Commission against Racism and Intolerance ECRI and about the ECRIBEL-CbC-III-2004-001-ENGhttps://hudoc.ecri.coe.int/eng?i=BEL-CbC-III-2004-001-ENG
Thuraisamy v. Canada
Thuraisamy v. Canada CCPR/C/106/D/1912/2009 Communication number s : 1912/2009 Author: Ganesaratnam Thuraisamy Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 106 Country Canada Submission date 28 Oct 2009 Date of decision 31 Oct 2012 Comment: The text of JUTBCCPR/C/106/D/1912/2009https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1353/en-US
Tiina Sanila-Aikio v. Finland
Tiina Sanila Aikio v. Finland CCPR/C/119/D/2668/2015 Communication number s : 2668/2015 Author: Tiina Sanila Aikio Type of decision: Admissibility decision Session No 119 Country Finland Submission date 02 Oct 2015 Date of decision 28 Mar 2017 Comment: JUTBCCPR/C/119/D/2668/2015https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2435/en-US
Tiina Sanila-Aikio v. Finland
Tiina Sanila Aikio v. Finland CCPR/C/124/D/2668/2015 Communication number s : 2668/2015 Author: Tiina Sanila Aikio Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 124 Country Finland Submission date 02 Oct 2015 Date of decision 01 Nov 2018 Comment: Note: JUTBCCPR/C/124/D/2668/2015https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2563/en-US
Toala et al. v. New Zealand
Toala et al. v. New Zealand CCPR/C/70/D/675/1995 Communication number s : 675/1995 Author: Simalae Toala et al. Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 70 Country New Zealand Submission date 19 Oct 1995 Date of decision 02 Nov 2000 Comment: JUTBCCPR/C/70/D/675/1995https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/900/en-US
Toregozhina v. Kazakhstan
Toregozhina v. Kazakhstan CCPR/C/124/D/2257/2013 Communication number s : 2257/2013 2334/2014 Author: Bakhytzhan Toregozhina Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 124 Country Kazakhstan Submission date 07 Nov 2012 Date of decision 15 Oct 2018 JUTBCCPR/C/124/D/2257/2013https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/3096/en-US
Truong v. Canada
Truong v. Canada CCPR/C/77/D/743/1997 Communication number s : 743/1997 Author: Ngoc Si Truong Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 77 Country Canada Submission date 26 Apr 1996 Date of decision 28 Mar 2003 Comment: This document has no JUTBCCPR/C/77/D/743/1997https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1035/en-US
U.S. v. Finland
U.S. v. Finland CAT/C/30/D/197/2002 Communication number s : 197/2002 Author: U.S. Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 30 Country Finland Submission date 07 Jan 2002 Date of decision 01 May 2003 Comment: This document has no comment: JUTBCAT/C/30/D/197/2002https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/168/en-US