Search
Data source
EU member states
Other countries
Keywords
Tags
Displaying 601 - 620 of 737
Conclusions XV-1 - France - Article 5
Conclusions XV 1 France Article 5 FRA 05 00 000 31/03/2000 31/03/2000 Article 5 Right to organise The Committee takes note of the information contained in the French report in particular the updated information on the right to organise in the public ESCXV-1/def/FRA/5//ENhttps://hudoc.esc.coe.int/eng?i=XV-1/def/FRA/5//EN
Conclusions XV-1 - Norway - Article 6-4
Conclusions XV 1 Norway Article 6 4 NOR 06 04 000 31/03/2000 31/03/2000 Article 6 Right to bargain collectively Paragraph 4 Collective action The Committee takes note of the information contained in the report of Norway. It also refers to the extensive ESCXV-1/def/NOR/6/4/ENhttps://hudoc.esc.coe.int/eng?i=XV-1/def/NOR/6/4/EN
Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms (ETS No. 005)
Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms ETS No. 005 005 Rome 1950 11 04T00:00:00 Treaty open for signature by the member States of the Council of Europe and for accession by the European Union Rome 1953 09 03T00:00:00 10 COEETS No. 005https://rm.coe.int/1680a2353d
Dadar v. Canada
Dadar v. Canada CAT/C/35/D/258/2004 Communication number s : 258/2004 Author: Mostafa Dadar Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 35 Country Canada Submission date 29 Nov 2004 Date of decision 23 Nov 2005 Comment: This document has no comment: JUTBCAT/C/35/D/258/2004https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/126/en-US
Dassum and Dassum v. Ecuador
Dassum and Dassum v. Ecuador CCPR/C/116/D/2244/2013 Communication number s : 2244/2013 Author: Roberto Isa as Dassum and William Isa as Dassum Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 116 Country Ecuador Submission date 12 Mar 2012 Date of decision JUTBCCPR/C/116/D/2244/2013https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/3094/en-US
Decision on admissibility and the merits: European Confederation of Police (EuroCOP) v. Ireland, Complaint No. 83/2012
Decision on admissibility and the merits: European Confederation of Police EuroCOP v. Ireland Complaint No. 83/2012 IRL 05 00 000 06 02 000 06 04 000 21 00 000 02/12/2013 17/05/2014 European Committee of Social Rights Comit europ en des Droits sociaux ESCcc-83-2012-dadmissandmerits-enhttps://hudoc.esc.coe.int/eng?i=cc-83-2012-dadmissandmerits-en
Decision on the merits: University Women of Europe (UWE) v. Greece, Complaint No. 131/2016
Decision on the merits: University Women of Europe UWE v. Greece Complaint No. 131/2016 GRC 01 00 000 04 00 000 04 03 000 20 00 000 91 100 163 91 118 163 91 121 163 91 197 163 2019 12 05 2020 06 29 European Committee of Social Rights Comit europ en des ESCcc-131-2016-dmerits-enhttps://hudoc.esc.coe.int/eng?i=cc-131-2016-dmerits-en
E.O.J., O.O.J., F.I.J., E.J. v. Sweden
E.O.J. O.O.J. F.I.J. E.J. v. Sweden CRPD/C/18/D/28/2015 Communication number s : 028/2015 Author: O.O.J. Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 20 Country Sweden Submission date 18 Mar 2015 Date of decision 18 Aug 2017 Comment: This JUTBCRPD/C/18/D/28/2015https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2391/en-US
ECUADOR: CONCLUDING OBSERVATIONS
ECUADOR: CONCLUDING OBSERVATIONS CAT/C/ECU/CO/7 NULL 2017 01 11T00:00:00 CAT United Nations CAT/C/ECU/CO/7 Convention against Torture Distr.: General 11 January 2017 and Other Cruel Inhuman English or Degrading Treatment Original: Spanish or Punishment UHRICAT/C/ECU/CO/7https://uhri.ohchr.org/en/document/12bd5eee-9179-423f-8163-33b37318d80c
European Convention on Extradition (ETS No. 024)
European Convention on Extradition ETS No. 024 024 Paris 1957 12 13T00:00:00 Treaty open for signature by the member States and for accession by non member States Paris 1960 04 18T00:00:00 3 Ratifications. The European Convention on Extradition provides COEETS No. 024https://rm.coe.int/1680064587
Evgeny Pugach v. Belarus
Evgeny Pugach v. Belarus CCPR/C/114/D/1984/2010 Communication number s : 1984/2010 Author: Evgeny Pugach Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 114 Country Belarus Submission date 13 Mar 2010 Date of decision 15 Jul 2015 Comment: This document JUTBCCPR/C/114/D/1984/2010https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1982/en-US
F.A. v. France
F.A. v. France CCPR/C/123/D/2662/2015 Communication number s : 2662/2015 Author: F.A. Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 123 Country France Submission date 18 Jun 2015 Date of decision 16 Jul 2018 Comment: This document has no comment: JUTBCCPR/C/123/D/2662/2015https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2548/en-US
FOURTH EVALUATION ROUND Corruption prevention in respect of members of parliament, judges and prosecutors EVALUATION REPORT MONACO
FOURTH EVALUATION ROUND Corruption prevention in respect of members of parliament judges and prosecutors EVALUATION REPORT MONACO MCO 2017 06 23 2017 07 13 TABLE OF CONTENTS SUMMARY I. INTRODUCTION AND METHODOLOGY II. BACKGROUND INFORMATION III. GRECOGrecoEval4Rep-2017-1-eng-Final-Monaco-PUBLIChttps://hudoc.greco.coe.int/eng?i=GrecoEval4Rep-2017-1-eng-Final-Monaco-PUBLIC
FOURTH EVALUATION ROUND Corruption prevention in respect of members of parliament, judges and prosecutors EVALUATION REPORT UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
FOURTH EVALUATION ROUND Corruption prevention in respect of members of parliament judges and prosecutors EVALUATION REPORT UNITED STATES OF AMERICA USA 2016 12 02 2017 01 17 TABLE OF CONTENTS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY I. INTRODUCTION AND METHODOLOGY II. CONTEXT GRECOGrecoEval4Rep-2016-10-en-Final-USA-PUBLIChttps://hudoc.greco.coe.int/eng?i=GrecoEval4Rep-2016-10-en-Final-USA-PUBLIC
Faurisson v. France
Faurisson v. France CCPR/C/58/D/550/1993 Communication number s : 550/1993 Author: Robert Faurisson Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 58 Country France Submission date 02 Jan 1993 Date of decision 08 Nov 1996 Comment: Pursuant to rule 85 of JUTBCCPR/C/58/D/550/1993https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/654/en-US
Fifth Evaluation Round Evaluation Report on Greece
Fifth Evaluation Round Evaluation Report on Greece GRC 2021 12 03 2022 03 03 Adoption: 3 December 2021 Publication : 3 March 2022 Public GrecoRC5 2020 4 FIFTH EVALUATION ROUND Preventing corruption and promoting integrity in central governments top GRECOGrecoEval5(2020)4-Final-eng-EvaluationReport-Greece-PUBLIChttps://hudoc.greco.coe.int/eng?i=GrecoEval5(2020)4-Final-eng-EvaluationReport-Greece-PUBLIC
Gillot et al. v. France
Gillot et al. v. France CCPR/C/75/D/932/2000 Communication number s : 932/2000 Author: Marie H l ne Gillot et al. Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 75 Country France Submission date 25 Jun 1999 Date of decision 15 Jul 2002 Comment: This JUTBCCPR/C/75/D/932/2000https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1011/en-US
Gonzalez del Rio v. Peru
Gonzalez del Rio v. Peru CCPR/C/46/D/263/1987 Communication number s : 263/1987 Author: Miguel Gonzalez del Rio Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 46 Country Peru Submission date 19 Oct 1987 Date of decision 28 Oct 1992 Comment: on 22 March JUTBCCPR/C/46/D/263/1987https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/332/en-US
Government comments on the third report on Italy
Government comments on the third report on Italy ITA 2005 12 16 2006 05 16 APPENDIX The following appendix does not form part of ECRI s analysis and proposals concerning the situation in Italy ECRI wishes to point out that the analysis contained in its ECRIITA-COM-III-2006-019-ENGhttps://hudoc.ecri.coe.int/eng?i=ITA-COM-III-2006-019-ENG
Goyet v. France
Goyet v. France CCPR/C/94/D/1746/2008 Communication number s : 1746/2008 Author: Farida Goyet Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 94 Country France Submission date 25 Jun 2007 Date of decision 30 Oct 2008 Comment: Pursuant to rule 90 of JUTBCCPR/C/94/D/1746/2008https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1468/en-US