Search
Data source
EU member states
Other countries
Keywords
Tags
Displaying 1 - 20 of 20
CASE OF ANDRLE v. THE CZECH REPUBLIC
CASE OF ANDRLE v. THE CZECH REPUBLIC 6268/08 LIPAVSKY J. CZE 2/17/2011 12:00:00 AM No violation of Art. 14 P1 1 Amendment of Act no. 155/1995 effective from 1 January 2010 343 100 464 369 304 321 542 238 354 ECLI:CE:ECHR:2011:0217JUD000626808 FIFTH ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2011:0217JUD000626808https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-103548
CASE OF B. v. SWITZERLAND
CASE OF B. v. SWITZERLAND 78630/12 LUGINB HL J. CHE 10/20/2020 12:00:00 AM Violation of Article 14 8 Prohibition of discrimination Article 14 Discrimination Article 8 1 Respect for family life Article 8 Right to respect for private and family life ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2020:1020JUD007863012https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-205675
CASE OF BURGHARTZ v. SWITZERLAND
CASE OF BURGHARTZ v. SWITZERLAND 16213/90 N/A CHE 2/22/1994 12:00:00 AM Preliminary objection rejected victim Preliminary objection rejected non exhaustion Violation of Art. 14 8 Not necessary to examine Art. 8 Costs and expenses partial award domestic ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:1994:0222JUD001621390https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-57865
CASE OF CROSSLAND v. THE UNITED KINGDOM
CASE OF CROSSLAND v. THE UNITED KINGDOM 36120/97 N/A GBR 11/9/1999 12:00:00 AM Struck out of the list Income and Corporation Taxes Act 1988 section 262 1 138 165 343 100 464 609 241 478 121 369 ECLI:CE:ECHR:1999:1109JUD003612097 THIRD SECTION CASE OF ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:1999:1109JUD003612097https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-58357
CASE OF DI TRIZIO v. SWITZERLAND
CASE OF DI TRIZIO v. SWITZERLAND 7186/09 MENGIS A. CHE 2/2/2016 12:00:00 AM Remainder inadmissible Violation of Article 14 8 Prohibition of discrimination Article 14 Discrimination Article 8 1 Respect for family life Respect for private life Article 8 ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2016:0202JUD000718609https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-160692
CASE OF E.B. AND OTHERS v. AUSTRIA
CASE OF E.B. AND OTHERS v. AUSTRIA 31913/07 38357/07 48098/07 48777/07 48779/07 GRAUPNER H. AUT 11/7/2013 12:00:00 AM Violation of Article 14 8 Prohibition of discrimination Article 14 Discrimination Article 8 Right to respect for private and family life ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2013:1107JUD003191307https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-127814
CASE OF KHAMTOKHU AND AKSENCHIK v. RUSSIA
CASE OF KHAMTOKHU AND AKSENCHIK v. RUSSIA 60367/08 961/11 YERMOLAYEVA N. MARALYAN A. DAVIDYAN E. MOSKALENKO K. RUS 1/24/2017 12:00:00 AM No violation of Article 14 5 Prohibition of discrimination Article 14 Discrimination Article 5 Right to liberty and ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2017:0124JUD006036708https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-170663
CASE OF KONSTANTIN MARKIN v. RUSSIA
CASE OF KONSTANTIN MARKIN v. RUSSIA 30078/06 N/A RUS 10/7/2010 12:00:00 AM Violation of Art. 14 8 Remainder inadmissible Non pecuniary damage finding of violation sufficient Pecuniary damage claim dismissed Respondent State to take measures of a general ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2010:1007JUD003007806https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-100926
CASE OF KONSTANTIN MARKIN v. RUSSIA
CASE OF KONSTANTIN MARKIN v. RUSSIA 30078/06 MOSKALENKO K. LISMAN N GERASIMOVA I. RUS 3/22/2012 12:00:00 AM Preliminary objection dismissed Article 34 Victim Preliminary objection dismissed Article 37 1 b Matter resolved Remainder inadmissible Violation ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2012:0322JUD003007806https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-109868
CASE OF MAYMULAKHIN AND MARKIV v. UKRAINE
CASE OF MAYMULAKHIN AND MARKIV v. UKRAINE 75135/14 TARAKHKALO M. LEBID V. ZAYIKINA Y. UKR 6/1/2023 12:00:00 AM Violation of Article 14 8 1 Prohibition of discrimination Article 14 Discrimination Article 8 Right to respect for private and family life ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2023:0601JUD007513514https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-224984
CASE OF MICHAEL MATTHEWS v. THE UNITED KINGDOM
CASE OF MICHAEL MATTHEWS v. THE UNITED KINGDOM 40302/98 GBR 7/15/2002 12:00:00 AM Struck out of the list friendly settlement London Regional Transport Act 1984 S. 50 1 and 7 Transport Act 1985 section 93 7 Greater London Authority Act 1999 sections 240 ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2002:0715JUD004030298https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-60607
CASE OF ÜNAL TEKELİ v. TURKEY
CASE OF NAL TEKEL v. TURKEY 29865/96 DEMIREL ERSEZEN AYDAN TUR 11/16/2004 12:00:00 AM Preliminary objection rejected victim six month period Violation of Art. 14 8 Not necessary to examine Art. 8 Non pecuniary damage finding of violation sufficient Costs ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2004:1116JUD002986596https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-67482
CASE OF PETROVIC v. AUSTRIA
CASE OF PETROVIC v. AUSTRIA 20458/92 N/A AUT 3/27/1998 12:00:00 AM No violation of Art. 14 8 Unemployment Benefit Act 1977 section 26 1 Federal law of 12 December 1989 343 100 464 238 451 ECLI:CE:ECHR:1998:0327JUD002045892 CASE OF PETROVIC v. AUSTRIA ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:1998:0327JUD002045892https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-58146
CASE OF RATZENBÖCK AND SEYDL v. AUSTRIA
CASE OF RATZENB CK AND SEYDL v. AUSTRIA 28475/12 GRAUPNER H. AUT 10/26/2017 12:00:00 AM No violation of Article 14 8 1 Prohibition of discrimination Article 14 Discrimination Article 8 Right to respect for private and family life Article 8 1 Respect for ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2017:1026JUD002847512https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-177916
CASE OF RUNKEE AND WHITE v. THE UNITED KINGDOM
CASE OF RUNKEE AND WHITE v. THE UNITED KINGDOM 42949/98 RIGHT S. GBR 5/10/2007 12:00:00 AM No violation of Art. 14 P1 1 in connection with non entitlement to a Widow s Pension Violation of Art. 14 P1 1 concerning non entitlement to a Widow s Payment Not ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2007:0510JUD004294998https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-80478
CASE OF STEC AND OTHERS v. THE UNITED KINGDOM
CASE OF STEC AND OTHERS v. THE UNITED KINGDOM 65731/01 65900/01 STARLING J. CLINCH J. GBR 4/12/2006 12:00:00 AM No violation of Art. 14 P1 1 Not necessary to examine victim status of third fourth and fifth applicants Social Security Contributions and ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2006:0412JUD006573101https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-73198
CASE OF VAN RAALTE v. THE NETHERLANDS
CASE OF VAN RAALTE v. THE NETHERLANDS 20060/92 N/A NLD 2/21/1997 12:00:00 AM Violation of Art. 14 Violation of P1 1 Pecuniary damage claim dismissed Non pecuniary damage finding of violation sufficient Costs and expenses award domestic proceedings Costs ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:1997:0221JUD002006092https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-58031
CASE OF WESSELS-BERGERVOET v. THE NETHERLANDS
CASE OF WESSELS BERGERVOET v. THE NETHERLANDS 34462/97 N/A NLD 6/4/2002 12:00:00 AM Violation of Art. 14 P1 1 Just satisfaction reserved General Old Age Pension Act Algemene Ouderdomswet Article 13 and former Article 10 343 100 464 292 369 ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2002:0604JUD003446297https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-60493
CASE OF WILLIS v. THE UNITED KINGDOM
CASE OF WILLIS v. THE UNITED KINGDOM 36042/97 N/A GBR 6/11/2002 12:00:00 AM Violation of Art. 14 P1 1 Not necessary to examine Art. 14 8 No violation of Art. 14 8 in connection with widow s pension Not necessary to examine Art. 14 8 or 14 P1 1 in ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2002:0611JUD003604297https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-60499
CASE OF ZARB ADAMI v. MALTA
CASE OF ZARB ADAMI v. MALTA 17209/02 REFALO I. MLT 6/20/2006 12:00:00 AM Violation of Art. 14 4 3 d Not necessary to examine Art. 14 6 Pecuniary damage claim dismissed Non pecuniary damage finding of violation sufficient Costs and expenses award domestic ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2006:0620JUD001720902https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-75934