Search
Data source
EU member states
Other countries
Keywords
Tags
Displaying 1 - 20 of 59
CASE OF AL-NASHIF v. BULGARIA
CASE OF AL NASHIF v. BULGARIA 50963/99 N/A BGR 6/20/2002 12:00:00 AM Preliminary objections dismissed non exhaustion of domestic remedies abuse of right of petition Violation of Art. 5 4 Violation of Art. 8 Violation of Art. 13 Not necessary to examine ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2002:0620JUD005096399https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-60522
CASE OF BAŞKAYA AND OKÇUOGLU v. TURKEY
CASE OF BA KAYA AND OK UOGLU v. TURKEY 23536/94 24408/94 N/A TUR 7/8/1999 12:00:00 AM Lack of jurisdiction to examine complaint under Art. 3 Lack of jurisdiction to examine complaint under Art. 14 No violation of Art. 7 first applicant Violation of Art. 7 ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:1999:0708JUD002353694https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-58276
CASE OF BAYATYAN v. ARMENIA
CASE OF BAYATYAN v. ARMENIA 23459/03 BURNS J.M. CARBONNEAU A. KHACHATRYAN R. ARM 10/27/2009 12:00:00 AM No violation of Art. 9 154 147 152 349 20 ECLI:CE:ECHR:2009:1027JUD002345903 THIRD SECTION CASE OF BAYATYAN v. ARMENIA Application no. 23459/03 ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2009:1027JUD002345903https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-95386
CASE OF BAYATYAN v. ARMENIA
CASE OF BAYATYAN v. ARMENIA 23459/03 CARBONNEAU A. BURNS J.M. KHACHATRYAN R. ARM 7/7/2011 12:00:00 AM Violation of Art. 9 Non pecuniary damage award Article 75 of the Criminal Code 154 237 152 269 354 216 ECLI:CE:ECHR:2011:0707JUD002345903 GRAND CHAMBER ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2011:0707JUD002345903https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-105611
CASE OF CHA'ARE SHALOM VE TSEDEK v. FRANCE
CASE OF CHA ARE SHALOM VE TSEDEK v. FRANCE 27417/95 N/A FRA 6/27/2000 12:00:00 AM No violation of Art. 9 No violation of Art. 14 9 Decree no. 80 791 of 1 October 1980 Article 10 154 237 294 204 269 371 359 343 100 413 292 354 609 ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2000:0627JUD002741795https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-58738
CASE OF CHASSAGNOU AND OTHERS v. FRANCE
CASE OF CHASSAGNOU AND OTHERS v. FRANCE 25088/94 28331/95 28443/95 N/A FRA 4/29/1999 12:00:00 AM Violation of P1 1 Violation of Art. 14 P1 1 Violation of Art. 11 Violation of Art. 14 11 Not necessary to examine Art. 9 Pecuniary damage claim dismissed Non ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:1999:0429JUD002508894https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-58288
CASE OF CHURCH OF SCIENTOLOGY MOSCOW v. RUSSIA
CASE OF CHURCH OF SCIENTOLOGY MOSCOW v. RUSSIA 18147/02 HODKIN P. KRYLOVA G. KUZMICHEV M. RUS 4/5/2007 12:00:00 AM Preliminary objection dismissed victim Violation of Art. 11 9 Not necessary to examine Art. 14 Pecuniary damage claim dismissed Non ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2007:0405JUD001814702https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-80038
CASE OF CORLEY AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA
CASE OF CORLEY AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA 292/06 43490/06 HOLINER D. KRYLOVA G. RUS 11/23/2021 12:00:00 AM Remainder inadmissible Art. 35 Admissibility criteria Art. 35 3 a Manifestly ill founded Violation of Article 1 of Protocol No. 7 Procedural safeguards ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2021:1123JUD000029206https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-213717
CASE OF CYPRUS v. TURKEY
CASE OF CYPRUS v. TURKEY 25781/94 N/A TUR 5/10/2001 12:00:00 AM No violation of Article 2 Right to life Article 2 1 Life Substantive aspect Violation of Article 2 Right to life Article 2 1 Effective investigation Procedural aspect No violation of Article ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2001:0510JUD002578194https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-59454
CASE OF DYAGILEV v. RUSSIA
CASE OF DYAGILEV v. RUSSIA 49972/16 PEREDRUK A. GOLUBOK S. RUS 3/10/2020 12:00:00 AM No violation of Article 9 Freedom of thought conscience and religion Article 9 Positive obligations Article 9 1 Freedom of conscience Article 59 of the Constitution ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2020:0310JUD004997216https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-201649
CASE OF EWEIDA AND OTHERS v. THE UNITED KINGDOM
CASE OF EWEIDA AND OTHERS v. THE UNITED KINGDOM 48420/10 36516/10 51671/10 59842/10 AUGHTON AINSWORTH P. DIAMOND ORMERODS GBR 1/15/2013 12:00:00 AM Remainder inadmissible Violation of Article 9 Freedom of thought conscience and religion Article 9 1 ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2013:0115JUD004842010https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-115881
CASE OF FELDEK v. SLOVAKIA
CASE OF FELDEK v. SLOVAKIA 29032/95 N/A SVK 7/12/2001 12:00:00 AM Violation of Art. 10 No separate issue under Art. 9 No violation of Art. 14 Pecuniary damage claim dismissed Non pecuniary damage financial award Costs and expenses partial award domestic ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2001:0712JUD002903295https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-59588
CASE OF FERNÁNDEZ MARTÍNEZ v. SPAIN
CASE OF FERN NDEZ MART NEZ v. SPAIN 56030/07 MAZON COSTA J.L. ESP 6/12/2014 12:00:00 AM No violation of Article 8 Right to respect for private and family life Article 8 1 Respect for private life Agreement of 3 January 1979 between Spain and the Holy See ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2014:0612JUD005603007https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-145068
CASE OF GLAS NADEZHDA EOOD AND ELENKOV v. BULGARIA
CASE OF GLAS NADEZHDA EOOD AND ELENKOV v. BULGARIA 14134/02 GROZEV Y. BGR 10/11/2007 12:00:00 AM Violation of Art. 10 Not necessary to examine Art. 9 Violation of Art. 13 10 Non pecuniary damage financial award Costs and expenses partial award Convention ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2007:1011JUD001413402https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-82632
CASE OF GLASER v. THE UNITED KINGDOM
CASE OF GLASER v. THE UNITED KINGDOM 32346/96 N/A GBR 9/19/2000 12:00:00 AM No violation of Art. 8 No violation of Art. 6 1 No violation of Art. 9 Family Law Act 1986 Ss. 25 29 34 154 152 310 445 7 40 136 406 451 425 ECLI:CE:ECHR:2000:0919JUD003234696 ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2000:0919JUD003234696https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-59080
CASE OF GRZELAK v. POLAND
CASE OF GRZELAK v. POLAND 7710/02 HARTUNG M. CIECWIERZ J. POL 6/15/2010 12:00:00 AM Remainder inadmissible Violation of Art. 14 9 Non pecuniary damage finding of violation sufficient Article 82 of the Constitution Sections 1 and 2 of the Freedom of ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2010:0615JUD000771002https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-99384
CASE OF HASAN AND CHAUSH v. BULGARIA
CASE OF HASAN AND CHAUSH v. BULGARIA 30985/96 BGR 10/26/2000 12:00:00 AM Preliminary objection rejected estoppel Violation of Art. 9 Violation of Art. 13 No violation of Art. 6 Not necessary to examine P1 1 Pecuniary damage claim dismissed Non pecuniary ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2000:1026JUD003098596https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-58921
CASE OF HASAN AND EYLEM ZENGİN v. TURKEY
CASE OF HASAN AND EYLEM ZENG N v. TURKEY 1448/04 N/A TUR 10/9/2007 12:00:00 AM Violation of P1 2 No separate issue under Art. 9 Non pecuniary damage finding of violation sufficient Costs and expenses award Convention proceedings Article 24 of the ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2007:1009JUD000144804https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-82580
CASE OF HOFFMANN v. AUSTRIA
CASE OF HOFFMANN v. AUSTRIA 12875/87 N/A AUT 6/23/1993 12:00:00 AM Violation of Art. 14 8 Not necessary to examine Art. 8 Not necessary to examine Art. 9 Not necessary to examine P1 2 Costs and expenses award Convention proceedings Basic Law Article 14 ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:1993:0623JUD001287587https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-57825
CASE OF HOLY SYNOD OF THE BULGARIAN ORTHODOX CHURCH (METROPOLITAN INOKENTIY) AND OTHERS v. BULGARIA
CASE OF HOLY SYNOD OF THE BULGARIAN ORTHODOX CHURCH METROPOLITAN INOKENTIY AND OTHERS v. BULGARIA 412/03 35677/04 POPOV L. BGR 1/22/2009 12:00:00 AM Violation of Art. 9 read in the light of Art. 11 No violation of Art. 6 No violation of P1 1 No violation ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2009:0122JUD000041203https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-90788