Search
Data source
EU member states
Other countries
Keywords
Tags
Displaying 1 - 20 of 20
A.F. v. Canada
A.F. v. Canada CCPR/C/131/D/2838/2016 Communication number s : 2838/2016 Author: A.F. Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 131 Country Canada Submission date 18 Oct 2016 Date of decision 17 Mar 2021 Comment: This document has no comment: JUTBCCPR/C/131/D/2838/2016https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/3247/en-US
A.K. et al. v. Australia
A.K. et al. v. Australia CCPR/C/132/D/2365/2014 Communication number s : 2365/2014 Author: A.K. et al. Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 132 Country Australia Submission date 13 Mar 2014 Date of decision 08 Jul 2021 Comment: This document JUTBCCPR/C/132/D/2365/2014https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/3109/en-US
Bakhtiyari v. Australia
Bakhtiyari v. Australia CCPR/C/79/D/1069/2002 Communication number s : 1069/2002 Author: Ali Aqsar Bakhtiyari and Roqaiha Bakhtiyari Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 79 Country Australia Submission date 25 Mar 2002 Date of decision 29 Oct JUTBCCPR/C/79/D/1069/2002https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1092/en-US
Bholi Pharaka v. Nepal
Bholi Pharaka v. Nepal CCPR/C/126/D/2773/2016 Communication number s : 2773/2016 Author: Bholi Pharaka Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 126 Country Nepal Submission date 11 May 2016 Date of decision 15 Jul 2019 Comment: Joint opinion of JUTBCCPR/C/126/D/2773/2016https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2779/en-US
Bronson Blessington and Matthew Elliot v. Australia
Bronson Blessington and Matthew Elliot v. Australia CCPR/C/112/D/1968/2010 Communication number s : 1968/2010 Author: Bronson Blessington and Matthew Elliot represented by Human Rights Law Centre Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 112 Country JUTBCCPR/C/112/D/1968/2010https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1890/en-US
Brough v. Australia
Brough v. Australia CCPR/C/86/D/1184/2003 Communication number s : 1184/2003 Author: Corey Brough Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 86 Country Australia Submission date 04 Mar 2003 Date of decision 17 Mar 2006 Comment: Pursuant to rule 90 of JUTBCCPR/C/86/D/1184/2003https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1241/en-US
Byrne and Lazarescu v. Canada
Byrne and Lazarescu v. Canada CCPR/C/65/D/742/1997 Communication number s : 742/1997 Author: Pamela R. M. Byrne and Linda E. Lazarescu Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 65 Country Canada Submission date 23 Apr 1996 Date of decision 25 JUTBCCPR/C/65/D/742/1997https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/775/en-US
D and E v. Australia
D and E v. Australia CCPR/C/87/D/1050/2002 Communication number s : 1050/2002 Author: D and E and their two children Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 87 Country Australia Submission date 01 Feb 2002 Date of decision 11 Jul 2006 Comment: JUTBCCPR/C/87/D/1050/2002https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1275/en-US
Dhakal et.al. v. Nepal
Dhakal et.al. v. Nepal CCPR/C/119/D/2185/2012 Communication number s : 2185/2012 Author: Bimala Dhakal Rabindra Dhakal and Manjima Dhakal Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 119 Country Nepal Submission date 31 Jan 2012 Date of decision 17 Mar JUTBCCPR/C/119/D/2185/2012https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2265/en-US
Fulmati Nyaya v. Nepal
Fulmati Nyaya v. Nepal CCPR/C/125/D/2556/2015 Communication number s : 2556/2015 Author: Fulmati Nyaya Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 125 Country Nepal Submission date 20 Jun 2014 Date of decision 18 Mar 2019 Comment: An individual JUTBCCPR/C/125/D/2556/2015https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2568/en-US
J.B. v. Australia
J.B. v. Australia CCPR/C/120/D/2798/2016 Communication number s : 2798/2016 Author: J.B. Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 120 Country Australia Submission date 12 Mar 2015 Date of decision 21 Jul 2017 Comment: This document has no JUTBCCPR/C/120/D/2798/2016https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2331/en-US
J.P.L. et al. v. France
J.P.L. et al. v. France CCPR/C/55/D/472/1991 Communication number s : 472/1991 Author: J.P.L. name deleted Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 55 Country France Submission date 16 Aug 1991 Date of decision 26 Oct 1995 Comment: This JUTBCCPR/C/55/D/472/1991https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/552/en-US
Laing v. Australia
Laing v. Australia CCPR/C/81/D/901/1999 Communication number s : 901/1999 Author: Deborah Joy Laing Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 81 Country Australia Submission date 30 Nov 1999 Date of decision 09 Jul 2004 Comment: Two individual JUTBCCPR/C/81/D/901/1999https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1091/en-US
Londoño Soto et al. v. Australia,Colombia
Londo o Soto et al. v. Australia Colombia CCPR/C/92/D/1429/2005 Communication number s : 1429/2005 Author: Blanca Lilia Londo o Soto Oscar Alberto Teran Cano Maria Hercilia Cano Bedoya Lina Marcela Teran Londo o and Lilia Andrea Teran Londo o Type of JUTBCCPR/C/92/D/1429/2005https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1413/en-US
Madafferi v. Australia
Madafferi v. Australia CCPR/C/81/D/1011/2001 Communication number s : 1011/2001 Author: Francesco Madafferi and Anna Maria Immacolata Madafferi Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 81 Country Australia Submission date 16 Jul 2001 Date of JUTBCCPR/C/81/D/1011/2001https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1123/en-US
Rajan and Rajan v. New Zealand
Rajan and Rajan v. New Zealand CCPR/C/78/D/820/1998 Communication number s : 820/1998 Author: Keshva Rajan and Sashi Kantra Rajan Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 78 Country New Zealand Submission date 11 Jul 1997 Date of decision 06 JUTBCCPR/C/78/D/820/1998https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1053/en-US
Ray Maya Nakarmi v. Nepal
Ray Maya Nakarmi v. Nepal CCPR/C/119/D/2184/2012 Communication number s : 2184/2012 Author: Ram Maya Namarmi Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 119 Country Nepal Submission date 31 Jan 2012 Date of decision 10 Mar 2017 Comment: This document JUTBCCPR/C/119/D/2184/2012https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2263/en-US
Tcholatch v. Canada
Tcholatch v. Canada CCPR/C/89/D/1052/2002 Communication number s : 1052/2002 Author: Natalya Tcholatch Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 89 Country Canada Submission date 03 Feb 1998 Date of decision 20 Mar 2007 Comment: This document has no JUTBCCPR/C/89/D/1052/2002https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1339/en-US
Winata and Li v. Australia
Winata and Li v. Australia CCPR/C/72/D/930/2000 Communication number s : 930/2000 Author: Hendrick Winata and So Lan Li Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 72 Country Australia Submission date 11 May 2000 Date of decision 26 Jul 2001 Comment: JUTBCCPR/C/72/D/930/2000https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/929/en-US
Youcif Almegaryaf and Hisham Matar (represented by TRIAL (Track Impunity Always)) v. Libya
Youcif Almegaryaf and Hisham Matar represented by TRIAL Track Impunity Always v. Libya CCPR/C/110/D/2006/2010 Communication number s : 2006/2010 Author: Youcif Almegaryaf and Hisham Matar represented by TRIAL Track Impunity Always Type of decision: JUTBCCPR/C/110/D/2006/2010https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1815/en-US