Search
Data source
EU member states
Other countries
Keywords
Tags
Displaying 5441 - 5451 of 5451
ZARA ISAYEVA v. Russia
ZARA ISAYEVA v. Russia RUS 06/07/2005 00:00:00 04/11/2016 11:41:33 Case Description: These cases concern mainly violations resulting from or relating to the actions of Russian security forces during anti terrorist operations in the Northern Caucasus EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-14078
Zilkija Selimović et al. v. Bosnia and Herzegovina
Zilkija Selimovi et al. v. Bosnia and Herzegovina CCPR/C/111/D/2003/2010 Communication number s : 2003/2010 Author: Zilkija Selimovi et al. Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 111 Country Bosnia and Herzegovina Submission date 04 May 2010 Date JUTBCCPR/C/111/D/2003/2010https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1859/en-US
de León Castro v. Spain
de Le n Castro v. Spain CCPR/C/95/D/1388/2005 Communication number s : 1388/2005 Author: Jos Luis de Le n Castro Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 95 Country Spain Submission date 23 Aug 2004 Date of decision 19 Mar 2009 Comment: The text of JUTBCCPR/C/95/D/1388/2005https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1016/en-US
fourth EVALUATION round Corruption prevention in respect of members of parliament, judges and prosecutors SECOND COMPLIANCE REPORT LUXEMBOURG
fourth EVALUATION round Corruption prevention in respect of members of parliament judges and prosecutors SECOND COMPLIANCE REPORT LUXEMBOURG LUX 2017 10 18 2017 10 20 I. INTRODUCTION The Second Compliance Report assesses the measures taken by the GRECOGrecoRC4-2017-17-Final-eng-Luxembourg-2ndRC-PUBLIChttps://hudoc.greco.coe.int/eng?i=GrecoRC4-2017-17-Final-eng-Luxembourg-2ndRC-PUBLIC
fourth evaluation round Corruption prevention in respect of members of parliament, judges and prosecutors COMPLIANCE REPORT LUXEMBOURG
fourth evaluation round Corruption prevention in respect of members of parliament judges and prosecutors COMPLIANCE REPORT LUXEMBOURG LUX 2015 06 19 2015 07 01 I. INTRODUCTION The Compliance Report assesses the measures taken by the Luxembourg authorities GRECOGreco-RC-IV-2015-5E-Final-Luxembourg-PUBLIChttps://hudoc.greco.coe.int/eng?i=Greco-RC-IV-2015-5E-Final-Luxembourg-PUBLIC
v. Algeria
v. Algeria CAT/C/52/D/402/2009 Communication number s : 402/2009 Author: Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 52 Country Algeria Submission date Date of decision Comment: This document has no comment: Substantive issues: No issues found JUTBCAT/C/52/D/402/2009https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1832/en-US
v. Algeria
v. Algeria CAT/C/46/D/341/2008 Communication number s : 341/2008 Author: Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 46 Country Algeria Submission date Date of decision Comment: This document has no comment: Substantive issues: No issues found JUTBCAT/C/46/D/341/2008https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1790/en-US
v. Algeria
v. Algeria CAT/C/51/D/376/2009 Communication number s : 376/2009 Author: Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 51 Country Algeria Submission date Date of decision Comment: This document has no comment: Substantive issues: No issues found JUTBCAT/C/51/D/376/2009https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1798/en-US
v. Burundi
v. Burundi CAT/C/52/D/503/2012 Communication number s : 503/2012 Author: Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 52 Country Burundi Submission date Date of decision Comment: This document has no comment: Substantive issues: No issues found JUTBCAT/C/52/D/503/2012https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1839/en-US
v. Denmark
v. Denmark CAT/C/52/D/466/2011 Communication number s : 466/2011 Author: Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 52 Country Denmark Submission date Date of decision Comment: This document has no comment: Substantive issues: No issues found JUTBCAT/C/52/D/466/2011https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1829/en-US
v. Netherlands
v. Netherlands CCPR/C/82/D/903/1999 Communication number s : 903/1999 Author: Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 82 Country Netherlands Submission date Date of decision Comment: This document has no comment: Substantive issues: No issues JUTBCCPR/C/82/D/903/1999https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1785/en-US