Search
Data source
EU member states
Other countries
Keywords
Tags
Displaying 41 - 60 of 12482
A.S. v. Sweden
A.S. v. Sweden CRPD/C/25/D/74/2019 Communication number s : 74/2019 Author: A.S. Type of decision: Discontinuance decision Session No 25 Country Sweden Submission date 12 Dec 2019 Date of decision 06 Sep 2021 Comment: This document has no comment: JUTBCRPD/C/25/D/74/2019https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/3065/en-US
A.W.P v. Denmark
A.W.P v. Denmark CCPR/C/109/D/1879/2009 Communication number s : 1879/2009 Author: A.W.P Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 109 Country Denmark Submission date 26 Mar 2009 Date of decision 01 Nov 2013 Comment: The text of an individual JUTBCCPR/C/109/D/1879/2009https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1678/en-US
A.W.R.A.P. v. Denmark
A.W.R.A.P. v. Denmark CERD/C/71/D/37/2006 Communication number s : 037/2006 Author: A.W.R.A.P. Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 71 Country Denmark Submission date 06 Jul 2006 Date of decision 08 Aug 2007 Comment: This document has no JUTBCERD/C/71/D/37/2006https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1735/en-US
A.Y.O.AQ v. Italy
A.Y.O.AQ v. Italy CCPR/C/134/D/3587/2019 Communication number s : 3587/2019 Author: A.Y.O.AQ Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 134 Country Italy Submission date 02 May 2018 Date of decision 25 Mar 2022 Comment: This document has no JUTBCCPR/C/134/D/3587/2019https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/3145/en-US
A. et al. v. Uzbekistan
A. et al. v. Uzbekistan CCPR/C/98/D/1079/2002 Communication number s : 1079/2002 Author: A. et al. Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 98 Country Uzbekistan Submission date 29 Apr 2002 Date of decision 19 Mar 2010 Comment: This document JUTBCCPR/C/98/D/1079/2002https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1545/en-US
A. v. Canada
A. v. Canada CAT/C/57/D/583/2014 Communication number s : 583/2014 Author: A. Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 57 Country Canada Submission date 16 Dec 2014 Date of decision 09 May 2016 Comment: This document has no comment: Substantive JUTBCAT/C/57/D/583/2014https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2115/en-US
A v. New Zealand
A v. New Zealand CCPR/C/66/D/754/1997 Communication number s : 754/1997 Author: A Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 66 Country New Zealand Submission date 19 Apr 1996 Date of decision 15 Jul 1999 Comment: Individual opinion submitted by JUTBCCPR/C/66/D/754/1997https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/802/en-US
ABDURASHIDOVA v. Russia
ABDURASHIDOVA v. Russia RUS 04/10/2010 00:00:00 04/11/2016 11:41:33 Case Description: Action of security forces: Illegal killings absence of effective remedy illegal searches unfair trial and violation of property rights in the context of actions of EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-14128
ABUYEVA AND OTHERS v. Russia
ABUYEVA AND OTHERS v. Russia RUS 11/04/2011 00:00:00 04/11/2016 11:41:33 Case Description: These cases concern mainly violations resulting from or relating to the actions of Russian security forces during anti terrorist operations in the Northern Caucasus EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-14124
ADOPTED CONCLUDING OBSERVATIONS: CZECH REPUBLIC
ADOPTED CONCLUDING OBSERVATIONS: CZECH REPUBLIC CEDAW/C/CZE/CO/6 NULL 2016 03 10T00:00:00 CEDAW United Nations CEDAW/C/CZE/CO/6 Convention on the Elimination Distr.: General of All Forms of Discrimination 14 March 2016 against Women Original: English UHRICEDAW/C/CZE/CO/6https://uhri.ohchr.org/en/document/df44459f-375a-4034-b0d5-fafc9b172d4d
ADOPTED CONCLUDING OBSERVATIONS: JAPAN
ADOPTED CONCLUDING OBSERVATIONS: JAPAN CEDAW/C/JPN/CO/7 8 NULL 2016 03 10T00:00:00 CEDAW United Nations CEDAW/C/JPN/CO/7 8 Convention on the Elimination Distr.: General of All Forms of Discrimination 10 March 2016 against Women Original: English Committee UHRICEDAW/C/JPN/CO/7-8https://uhri.ohchr.org/en/document/d87f0f54-695a-4507-ba62-448fc975f8f2
ADOPTED CONCLUDING OBSERVATIONS: MONGOLIA
ADOPTED CONCLUDING OBSERVATIONS: MONGOLIA CEDAW/C/MNG/CO/8 9 NULL 2016 03 10T00:00:00 CEDAW United Nations CEDAW/C/MNG/CO/8 9 Convention on the Elimination Distr.: General of All Forms of Discrimination 10 March 2016 against Women Original: English UHRICEDAW/C/MNG/CO/8-9https://uhri.ohchr.org/en/document/bae2a50c-8d7c-4b1e-beee-e65270d191f1
ADOPTED CONCLUDING OBSERVATIONS: SWEDEN
ADOPTED CONCLUDING OBSERVATIONS: SWEDEN CEDAW/C/SWE/CO/8 9 NULL 2016 03 10T00:00:00 CEDAW United Nations CEDAW/C/SWE/CO/8 9 Convention on the Elimination Distr.: General of All Forms of Discrimination 10 March 2016 against Women Original: English UHRICEDAW/C/SWE/CO/8-9https://uhri.ohchr.org/en/document/b1983f51-e09a-4ee8-b8bc-0445222180f2
ADOPTED CONCLUDING OBSERVATIONS: VANUATU
ADOPTED CONCLUDING OBSERVATIONS: VANUATU CEDAW/C/VUT/CO/4 5 NULL 2016 03 09T00:00:00 CEDAW United Nations CEDAW/C/VUT/CO/4 5 Convention on the Elimination Distr.: General of All Forms of Discrimination 9 March 2016 against Women Original: English UHRICEDAW/C/VUT/CO/4-5https://uhri.ohchr.org/en/document/2addb075-7489-4def-9bb7-0ee9f35f07c1
AERTS v. Belgium
AERTS v. Belgium BEL 30/07/1998 00:00:00 25/10/2016 14:46:28 Case Description: Protection of rights in detention / access to and effective functioning of justice: Lawfulness of the applicant s detention in a psychiatric wing of a prison pending his EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-1369
AGRATI AND OTHERS v. Italy
AGRATI AND OTHERS v. Italy ITA 28/11/2011 00:00:00 08/11/2016 09:13:26 Case Description: This group of cases concerns the retroactive application of Law No. 266/2005 to pending judicial proceedings concerning the approximately 310 applicants length of EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-28264
AKA v. Turkey
AKA v. Turkey TUR 23/09/1998 00:00:00 07/11/2016 17:30:19 Case Description: Protection of property: Disproportionate interference due to the administration s delay in paying additional compensation for expropriation with regard to the difference between EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-26578
AKKUS v. Turkey
AKKUS v. Turkey TUR 09/07/1997 00:00:00 28/10/2016 15:13:12 Case Description: Protection of property: Disproportionate interference due to the administration s delay in paying additional compensation for expropriation with regard to the difference between EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-5460
ALIEV v. Ukraine
ALIEV v. Ukraine UKR 29/07/2003 00:00:00 08/11/2016 10:44:14 Case Description: Protection against ill treatment/conditions of detention protection of private and family life/freedom of religion and lack of a remedy: poor conditions of detention for EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-31304
ANDERSON v. the United Kingdom
ANDERSON v. the United Kingdom GBR 20/02/2008 00:00:00 26/10/2016 20:41:06 Case Description: Discrimination and protection of property: Discriminatory treatment on grounds of gender between widows and widowers regarding social security benefits and/or an EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-2786