Search
Data source
EU member states
Other countries
Keywords
Tags
Displaying 4121 - 4140 of 4214
Special Representative of the Secretary-General on human rights defenders
Report to HRC E/CN.4/2002/106/Add.1 from 30 July 2001 to 4 August 2001 12 March 2002 Special Representative of the Secretary General on human rights defenders Kyrgyzstan E UNITED NATIONS Economic and Social Distr. Council GENERAL E/CN.4/2002/106/Add.1 12 UNSPE/CN.4/2002/106/Add.1https://spinternet.ohchr.org/Download.aspx?SymbolNo=E%2fCN.4%2f2002%2f106%2fAdd.1&Lang=en
Sroub v. Czech Republic
Sroub v. Czech Republic CCPR/C/97/D/1573/2007 Communication number s : 1573/2007 Author: Vaclav Sroub Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 97 Country Czech Republic Submission date 03 Dec 2006 Date of decision 27 Oct 2009 Comment: This JUTBCCPR/C/97/D/1573/2007https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1543/en-US
Stefan Lars Nystrom v. Australia
Stefan Lars Nystrom v. Australia CCPR/C/102/D/1557/2007 Communication number s : 1557/2007 Author: Stefan Lars Nystrom represented by the Human Rights Law Resource Centre Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 102 Country Australia Submission JUTBCCPR/C/102/D/1557/2007https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1211/en-US
Strik v. Netherlands
Strik v. Netherlands CCPR/C/76/D/1001/2001 Communication number s : 1001/2001 Author: Jacobus Gerardus Strik Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 76 Country Netherlands Submission date 29 Jun 1999 Date of decision 01 Nov 2002 Comment: JUTBCCPR/C/76/D/1001/2001https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1029/en-US
Sudalenko v. Belarus
Sudalenko v. Belarus CCPR/C/104/D/1750/2008 Communication number s : 1750/2008 Author: Leonid Sudalenko Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 104 Country Belarus Submission date 17 Mar 2005 Date of decision 14 Mar 2012 Comment: This document has JUTBCCPR/C/104/D/1750/2008https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1221/en-US
Sultanova v. Uzbekistan
Sultanova v. Uzbekistan CCPR/C/86/D/915/2000 Communication number s : 915/2000 Author: Darmon Sultanova Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 86 Country Uzbekistan Submission date 07 Feb 2000 Date of decision 30 Mar 2006 Comment: In accordance JUTBCCPR/C/86/D/915/2000https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1250/en-US
Summary of Stakeholders’ submissions on the United States of America - Report of the Office of the United Nations High Commissioner for Human Rights
United Nations A/HRC/WG.6/36/USA/3 General Assembly Distr.: General 6 March 2020 Original: English Human Rights Council Working Group on the Universal Periodic Review Thirty sixth session 4 15 May 2020 Summary of Stakeholders submissions on the United UPRA/HRC/WG.6/36/USA/3https://www.ohchr.org//en/documents/reports/summary-stakeholders-submissions-united-states-america-report-office-united
T.P.F. v. Peru
T.P.F. v. Peru CEDAW/C/50/D/22/2009 Communication number s : 022/2009 Author: T.P.F. Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 50 Country Peru Submission date 18 Jun 2009 Date of decision 17 Oct 2011 Comment: This document has no comment: JUTBCEDAW/C/50/D/22/2009https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1704/en-US
TAJIKISTAN: CONCLUDING OBSERVATIONS
TAJIKISTAN: CONCLUDING OBSERVATIONS CCPR/C/TJK/CO/3 NULL 2019 08 22T00:00:00 CCPR United Nations CCPR/C/TJK/CO/3 International Covenant on Distr.: General 22 August 2019 Civil and Political Rights Original: English Human Rights Committee Concluding UHRICCPR/C/TJK/CO/3https://uhri.ohchr.org/en/document/722f6192-8f4b-40f4-887f-806ca882cedd
TEMUR ONEL v. Turkey
TEMUR ONEL v. Turkey TUR 23/08/2002 00:00:00 08/11/2016 10:10:46 Case Description: Protection of property: Disproportionate interference due to the administration s delay in paying additional compensation awarded by the domestic courts for the EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-28609
TURANLI ET AL v. Turkey
TURANLI ET AL v. Turkey TUR 26/04/1999 00:00:00 08/11/2016 10:10:46 Case Description: Protection of property: Disproportionate interference due to the administration s delay in paying additional compensation for expropriation with regard to the difference EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-28539
TURHAN ATAY AND OTHERS v. Turkey
TURHAN ATAY AND OTHERS v. Turkey TUR 26/09/2007 00:00:00 08/11/2016 10:21:37 Case Description: Protection of property: Disproportionate interference due to delays in payment of additional compensation for expropriation and insufficient rate of default EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-30282
Tatiana Shikhmuradova on behalf of her husband, Boris Shikhmuradov v. Turkmenistan
Tatiana Shikhmuradova on behalf of her husband Boris Shikhmuradov v. Turkmenistan CCPR/C/112/D/2069/2011 Communication number s : 2069/2011 Author: Tatiana Shikhmuradova on behalf of her husband Boris Shikhmuradov not represented by counsel Type of JUTBCCPR/C/112/D/2069/2011https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1907/en-US
Tatyana Yachnik v. Belarus
Tatyana Yachnik v. Belarus CCPR/C/111/D/1990/2010 Communication number s : 1990/2010 Author: Tatyana Yachnik Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 111 Country Belarus Submission date 10 Jun 2009 Date of decision 21 Jul 2014 Comment: This JUTBCCPR/C/111/D/1990/2010https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1855/en-US
Tcholatch v. Canada
Tcholatch v. Canada CCPR/C/89/D/1052/2002 Communication number s : 1052/2002 Author: Natalya Tcholatch Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 89 Country Canada Submission date 03 Feb 1998 Date of decision 20 Mar 2007 Comment: This document has no JUTBCCPR/C/89/D/1052/2002https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1339/en-US
The Vienna Intervention Centre against Domestic Violence and the Association for Women's Access to Justice on behalf of Banu Akbak, Gülen Khan, and Melissa Özdemir (descendants of the deceased) v. Austria
The Vienna Intervention Centre against Domestic Violence and the Association for Women s Access to Justice on behalf of Banu Akbak G len Khan and Melissa zdemir descendants of the deceased v. Austria CEDAW/C/39/D/6/2005 Communication number s : 006/2005 JUTBCEDAW/C/39/D/6/2005https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1711/en-US
Third Evaluation Round Evaluation Report on Albania on Transparency of Party Funding (Theme II)
Third Evaluation Round Evaluation Report on Albania on Transparency of Party Funding Theme II ALB 2009 05 15 2009 09 17 Directorate General of Human Rights and Legal Affairs Directorate of Monitoring Strasbourg 15 May 2009 Public Greco Eval III Rep 2008 GRECOGreco-Eval-III-Rep-2008-7E-Final-Albania-PF-PUBLIChttps://hudoc.greco.coe.int/eng?i=Greco-Eval-III-Rep-2008-7E-Final-Albania-PF-PUBLIC
Third Evaluation Round Evaluation Report on Armenia on Transparency of party funding (Theme II)
Third Evaluation Round Evaluation Report on Armenia on Transparency of party funding Theme II ARM 2010 12 03 2011 04 11 Directorate General of Human Rights and Legal Affairs Directorate Of Monitoring Strasbourg 3 December 2010 Public Greco Eval III Rep GRECOGreco-Eval-III-Rep-2010-4E-Final-Armenia-PF-PUBLIChttps://hudoc.greco.coe.int/eng?i=Greco-Eval-III-Rep-2010-4E-Final-Armenia-PF-PUBLIC
Third Evaluation Round Evaluation Report on Finland on Transparency of Party Funding (Theme II)
Third Evaluation Round Evaluation Report on Finland on Transparency of Party Funding Theme II FIN 2007 12 07 2007 12 12 Directorate General of Human Rights and Legal Affairs Directorate of Monitoring Strasbourg 7 December 2007 Public Greco Eval III Rep GRECOGreco-Eval-III-Rep-2007-2E-Final-Finland-PF-PUBLIChttps://hudoc.greco.coe.int/eng?i=Greco-Eval-III-Rep-2007-2E-Final-Finland-PF-PUBLIC
Third Evaluation Round Evaluation Report on Georgia on Transparency of party funding (Theme II)
Third Evaluation Round Evaluation Report on Georgia on Transparency of party funding Theme II GEO 2011 05 27 2011 07 11 Directorate General of Human Rights and Legal Affairs Directorate of Monitoring Strasbourg 27 May 2011 Public Greco Eval III Rep 2010 GRECOGreco-Eval-III-Rep-2010-12E-Final-Georgia-PF-PUBLIChttps://hudoc.greco.coe.int/eng?i=Greco-Eval-III-Rep-2010-12E-Final-Georgia-PF-PUBLIC