Search
Data source
EU member states
Other countries
Keywords
Tags
Displaying 1 - 20 of 9389
4. International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights
STATUS AS AT : 14 06 2023 09:15:30 EDT CHAPTER IV HUMAN RIGHTS 4. International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights New York 16 December 1966 Entry into force : 23 March 1976 in accordance with article 49 for all provisions except those of article 41 UNIV-4https://treaties.un.org//Pages/ViewDetails.aspx?src=TREATY&mtdsg_no=IV-4&chapter=4&clang=_en
A. A. C. v. Sweden
A. A. C. v. Sweden CAT/C/37/D/227/2003 Communication number s : 227/2003 Author: A.A.C. Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 37 Country Sweden Submission date 06 Feb 2003 Date of decision 16 Nov 2006 Comment: This document has no comment: JUTBCAT/C/37/D/227/2003https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/112/en-US
A.A.M. v. Sweden
A.A.M. v. Sweden CAT/C/48/D/413/2010 Communication number s : 413/2010 Author: A.A.M. Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 48 Country Sweden Submission date 19 Feb 2010 Date of decision 23 May 2012 Comment: This document has no comment: JUTBCAT/C/48/D/413/2010https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/49/en-US
A A. v. Azerbaijan
A A. v. Azerbaijan CAT/C/35/D/247/2004 Communication number s : 247/2004 Author: A.A. Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 35 Country Azerbaijan Submission date 28 Feb 2004 Date of decision 25 Nov 2005 Comment: This document has no JUTBCAT/C/35/D/247/2004https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/123/en-US
A. AND E. RIIS v. Norway
A. AND E. RIIS v. Norway NOR 31/08/2007 00:00:00 20/10/2016 18:39:43 Case Description: Access to and efficient functioning of justice: Excessive length of certain civil proceedings. Article 6 1 Status of Execution: Case closed. Main measures adopted: EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-193
A.B. and B.D. v. Poland
A.B. and B.D. v. Poland CCPR/C/135/D/3017/2017 Communication number s : 3017/2017 Author: A.B. and B.D. Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 135 Country Poland Submission date 24 Aug 2017 Date of decision 21 Jul 2022 Comment: This document has JUTBCCPR/C/135/D/3017/2017https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/3673/en-US
A.B. v. Canada
A.B. v. Canada CCPR/C/117/D/2387/2014 Communication number s : 2387/2014 Author: A.B. represented by counsel Laura Brittain then Benjamin Liston Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 117 Country Canada Submission date 29 Apr 2014 Date of JUTBCCPR/C/117/D/2387/2014https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2197/en-US
A.G. v. Netherlands
A.G. v. Netherlands CCPR/C/130/D/3052/2017 Communication number s : 3052/2017 Author: A.G. Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 130 Country Netherlands Submission date 31 Oct 2017 Date of decision 06 Nov 2020 Comment: This document has no JUTBCCPR/C/130/D/3052/2017https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/3258/en-US
A.H.G. v. Canada
A.H.G. v. Canada CCPR/C/113/D/2091/2011 Communication number s : 2091/2011 Author: A.H.G. Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 113 Country Canada Submission date 28 Aug 2011 Date of decision 25 Mar 2015 Comment: This document has no comment: JUTBCCPR/C/113/D/2091/2011https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1926/en-US
A. H. v. Sweden
A. H. v. Sweden CAT/C/35/D/250/2004 Communication number s : 250/2004 Author: A.H. Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 35 Country Sweden Submission date 18 Jul 2004 Date of decision 15 Nov 2005 Comment: This document has no comment: JUTBCAT/C/35/D/250/2004https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/121/en-US
A. K. and A. R. v. Uzbekistan
A. K. and A. R. v. Uzbekistan CCPR/C/95/D/1233/2003 Communication number s : 1233/2003 Author: A. K. and A. R. Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 95 Country Uzbekistan Submission date 09 Jul 2003 Date of decision 31 Mar 2009 Comment: This JUTBCCPR/C/95/D/1233/2003https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1015/en-US
A.M.B. v. Ecuador
A.M.B. v. Ecuador E/C.12/58/D/3/2014 Communication number s : 003/2014 Author: A.M.B. Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 58 Country Ecuador Submission date Date of decision 20 Jun 2016 Comment: This document has no comment: Substantive JUTBE/C.12/58/D/3/2014https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2137/en-US
A.M.D. et al. v. Denmark
A.M.D. et al. v. Denmark CAT/C/60/D/653/2015 Communication number s : 653/2015 Author: A.M.D. et al. Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 60 Country Denmark Submission date 24 Dec 2014 Date of decision 12 May 2017 Comment: This document has no JUTBCAT/C/60/D/653/2015https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/3429/en-US
A.W.P v. Denmark
A.W.P v. Denmark CCPR/C/109/D/1879/2009 Communication number s : 1879/2009 Author: A.W.P Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 109 Country Denmark Submission date 26 Mar 2009 Date of decision 01 Nov 2013 Comment: The text of an individual JUTBCCPR/C/109/D/1879/2009https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1678/en-US
A and B v. Azerbaijan
A and B v. Azerbaijan CAT/C/74/D/905/2018 Communication number s : 905/2018 Author: A and B Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 74 Country Azerbaijan Submission date 22 Dec 2018 Date of decision 27 Jul 2022 Comment: This document has no JUTBCAT/C/74/D/905/2018https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/3586/en-US
A. v. Canada
A. v. Canada CAT/C/57/D/583/2014 Communication number s : 583/2014 Author: A. Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 57 Country Canada Submission date 16 Dec 2014 Date of decision 09 May 2016 Comment: This document has no comment: Substantive JUTBCAT/C/57/D/583/2014https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2115/en-US
ABU ZUBAYDAH v. Lithuania
ABU ZUBAYDAH v. Lithuania LTU 08/10/2018 00:00:00 03/12/2018 15:46:42 Case Description: The case concerns violations of a number of Convention rights on account of the fact that the applicant was the victim of an extraordinary rendition operation. The EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-50865
ADEISHVILI (MAZMISHVILI) v. Russia
ADEISHVILI MAZMISHVILI v. Russia RUS 16/01/2015 00:00:00 04/11/2016 11:41:33 Case Description: Inhuman and degrading treatment of the applicant on account of the overcrowded conditions of his detention in the special detention centre for foreigners in EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-14044
AGRAG AND OTHERS v. Turkey
AGRAG AND OTHERS v. Turkey TUR 27/10/2004 00:00:00 09/11/2016 16:14:15 Case Description: Protection of rights in detention: Excessive length of police custody. Article 5 3 Status of Execution: Case closed. Main measures adopted: Individual measures: Just EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-35564
AHMED v. Austria
AHMED v. Austria AUT 17/12/1996 00:00:00 25/10/2016 11:58:40 Case Description: Protection against ill treatment / expulsion: Serious risk of ill treatment in case of expulsion of the applicant to Somalia in the context of civil war and fighting between EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-793