Search
Data source
EU member states
Other countries
Keywords
Tags
Displaying 1 - 18 of 18
CASE OF B. v. SWITZERLAND
CASE OF B. v. SWITZERLAND 78630/12 LUGINB HL J. CHE 10/20/2020 12:00:00 AM Violation of Article 14 8 Prohibition of discrimination Article 14 Discrimination Article 8 1 Respect for family life Article 8 Right to respect for private and family life ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2020:1020JUD007863012https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-205675
CASE OF BARROW v. THE UNITED KINGDOM
CASE OF BARROW v. THE UNITED KINGDOM 42735/02 N/A GBR 8/22/2006 12:00:00 AM No violation of Art. 14 P1 1 Section 122 of the Social Security Benefits Act 1992 Section 126 of the Pensions Act 1995 Social Security Incapacity for Work Act 1994 343 100 464 292 ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2006:0822JUD004273502https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-76746
CASE OF BEELER v. SWITZERLAND
CASE OF BEELER v. SWITZERLAND 78630/12 LUGINB HL J. CHE 10/11/2022 12:00:00 AM Preliminary objection dismissed Art. 35 Admissibility criteria Art. 35 3 a Ratione materiae Violation of Article 14 8 1 Prohibition of discrimination Article 14 Discrimination ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2022:1011JUD007863012https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-220073
CASE OF ĒCIS v. LATVIA
CASE OF CIS v. LATVIA 12879/09 ALLIKS A. LVA 1/10/2019 12:00:00 AM Preliminary objection dismissed Art. 35 Admissibility criteria Art. 35 1 Exhaustion of domestic remedies Violation of Article 14 8 Prohibition of discrimination Article 14 Discrimination ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2019:0110JUD001287909https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-188991
CASE OF DI TRIZIO v. SWITZERLAND
CASE OF DI TRIZIO v. SWITZERLAND 7186/09 MENGIS A. CHE 2/2/2016 12:00:00 AM Remainder inadmissible Violation of Article 14 8 Prohibition of discrimination Article 14 Discrimination Article 8 1 Respect for family life Respect for private life Article 8 ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2016:0202JUD000718609https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-160692
CASE OF KHAMTOKHU AND AKSENCHIK v. RUSSIA
CASE OF KHAMTOKHU AND AKSENCHIK v. RUSSIA 60367/08 961/11 YERMOLAYEVA N. MARALYAN A. DAVIDYAN E. MOSKALENKO K. RUS 1/24/2017 12:00:00 AM No violation of Article 14 5 Prohibition of discrimination Article 14 Discrimination Article 5 Right to liberty and ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2017:0124JUD006036708https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-170663
CASE OF KONSTANTIN MARKIN v. RUSSIA
CASE OF KONSTANTIN MARKIN v. RUSSIA 30078/06 N/A RUS 10/7/2010 12:00:00 AM Violation of Art. 14 8 Remainder inadmissible Non pecuniary damage finding of violation sufficient Pecuniary damage claim dismissed Respondent State to take measures of a general ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2010:1007JUD003007806https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-100926
CASE OF KONSTANTIN MARKIN v. RUSSIA
CASE OF KONSTANTIN MARKIN v. RUSSIA 30078/06 MOSKALENKO K. LISMAN N GERASIMOVA I. RUS 3/22/2012 12:00:00 AM Preliminary objection dismissed Article 34 Victim Preliminary objection dismissed Article 37 1 b Matter resolved Remainder inadmissible Violation ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2012:0322JUD003007806https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-109868
CASE OF ÜNAL TEKELİ v. TURKEY
CASE OF NAL TEKEL v. TURKEY 29865/96 DEMIREL ERSEZEN AYDAN TUR 11/16/2004 12:00:00 AM Preliminary objection rejected victim six month period Violation of Art. 14 8 Not necessary to examine Art. 8 Non pecuniary damage finding of violation sufficient Costs ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2004:1116JUD002986596https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-67482
CASE OF PEARSON v. THE UNITED KINGDOM
CASE OF PEARSON v. THE UNITED KINGDOM 8374/03 N/A GBR 8/22/2006 12:00:00 AM No violation of Art. 14 P1 1 Section 122 of the Social Security Benefits Act 1992 Section 126 of the Pensions Act 1995 343 100 464 292 369 304 ECLI:CE:ECHR:2006:0822JUD000837403 ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2006:0822JUD000837403https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-76762
CASE OF RUNKEE AND WHITE v. THE UNITED KINGDOM
CASE OF RUNKEE AND WHITE v. THE UNITED KINGDOM 42949/98 RIGHT S. GBR 5/10/2007 12:00:00 AM No violation of Art. 14 P1 1 in connection with non entitlement to a Widow s Pension Violation of Art. 14 P1 1 concerning non entitlement to a Widow s Payment Not ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2007:0510JUD004294998https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-80478
CASE OF STEC AND OTHERS v. THE UNITED KINGDOM
CASE OF STEC AND OTHERS v. THE UNITED KINGDOM 65731/01 65900/01 STARLING J. CLINCH J. GBR 4/12/2006 12:00:00 AM No violation of Art. 14 P1 1 Not necessary to examine victim status of third fourth and fifth applicants Social Security Contributions and ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2006:0412JUD006573101https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-73198
CASE OF VROUNTOU v. CYPRUS
CASE OF VROUNTOU v. CYPRUS 33631/06 CHRISTOPHI C. CYP 10/13/2015 12:00:00 AM Violation of Article 14 P1 1 1 Prohibition of discrimination Article 14 Discrimination Article 1 of Protocol No. 1 Protection of property Article 1 para. 1 of Protocol No. 1 ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2015:1013JUD003363106https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-158090
CASE OF WALKER v. THE UNITED KINGDOM
CASE OF WALKER v. THE UNITED KINGDOM 37212/02 LIBERTY GBR 8/22/2006 12:00:00 AM No violation of Art. 14 P1 1 Social Security Benefits Act 1992 Section 126 of the Pensions Act 1995 343 100 464 292 369 304 457 ECLI:CE:ECHR:2006:0822JUD003721202 FOURTH ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2006:0822JUD003721202https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-76766
CASE OF WESSELS-BERGERVOET v. THE NETHERLANDS
CASE OF WESSELS BERGERVOET v. THE NETHERLANDS 34462/97 N/A NLD 6/4/2002 12:00:00 AM Violation of Art. 14 P1 1 Just satisfaction reserved General Old Age Pension Act Algemene Ouderdomswet Article 13 and former Article 10 343 100 464 292 369 ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2002:0604JUD003446297https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-60493
CASE OF WILLIS v. THE UNITED KINGDOM
CASE OF WILLIS v. THE UNITED KINGDOM 36042/97 N/A GBR 6/11/2002 12:00:00 AM Violation of Art. 14 P1 1 Not necessary to examine Art. 14 8 No violation of Art. 14 8 in connection with widow s pension Not necessary to examine Art. 14 8 or 14 P1 1 in ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2002:0611JUD003604297https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-60499
CASE OF YOCHEVA AND GANEVA v. BULGARIA
CASE OF YOCHEVA AND GANEVA v. BULGARIA 18592/15 43863/15 MARCHEVA D. BORISOV P. BGR 5/11/2021 12:00:00 AM Preliminary objection dismissed Art. 35 Admissibility criteria Art. 35 3 b No significant disadvantage Remainder inadmissible Art. 35 Admissibility ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2021:0511JUD001859215https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-209866
CASE OF ZARB ADAMI v. MALTA
CASE OF ZARB ADAMI v. MALTA 17209/02 REFALO I. MLT 6/20/2006 12:00:00 AM Violation of Art. 14 4 3 d Not necessary to examine Art. 14 6 Pecuniary damage claim dismissed Non pecuniary damage finding of violation sufficient Costs and expenses award domestic ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2006:0620JUD001720902https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-75934