Search
Data source
EU member states
Other countries
Keywords
Tags
Displaying 21 - 40 of 2119
A.J. v. United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland
A.J. v. United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland CEDAW/C/74/D/126/2018 Communication number s : 126/2018 Author: A.J. Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 74 Country United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland JUTBCEDAW/C/74/D/126/2018https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2666/en-US
A.K. v. Australia
A.K. v. Australia CAT/C/32/D/148/1999 Communication number s : 148/1999 Author: A.K. Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 32 Country Australia Submission date 13 Oct 1999 Date of decision 05 May 2004 Comment: Under rule 108 9 the State party JUTBCAT/C/32/D/148/1999https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/152/en-US
Aïcha Habouchi v. Algeria
A cha Habouchi v. Algeria CCPR/C/128/D/2819/2016 Communication number s : 2819/2016 Author: A cha Habouchi Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 128 Country Algeria Submission date 07 Apr 2016 Date of decision 27 Mar 2020 Comment: This document JUTBCCPR/C/128/D/2819/2016https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2871/en-US
ADOPTED CONCLUDING OBSERVATIONS: SWEDEN
ADOPTED CONCLUDING OBSERVATIONS: SWEDEN CEDAW/C/SWE/CO/8 9 NULL 2016 03 10T00:00:00 CEDAW United Nations CEDAW/C/SWE/CO/8 9 Convention on the Elimination Distr.: General of All Forms of Discrimination 10 March 2016 against Women Original: English UHRICEDAW/C/SWE/CO/8-9https://uhri.ohchr.org/en/document/b1983f51-e09a-4ee8-b8bc-0445222180f2
AFGHANISTAN: CONCLUDING OBSERVATIONS
AFGHANISTAN: CONCLUDING OBSERVATIONS CAT/C/AFG/CO/2 NULL 2017 06 12T00:00:00 CAT United Nations CAT/C/AFG/CO/2 Convention against Torture Distr.: General 12 June 2017 and Other Cruel Inhuman or Degrading Treatment Original: English or Punishment Committee UHRICAT/C/AFG/CO/2https://uhri.ohchr.org/en/document/f8a1c4a3-5be3-4e9a-b9fc-86481147aa50
AL NASHIRI v. Romania
AL NASHIRI v. Romania ROU 08/10/2018 00:00:00 10/12/2018 09:38:46 Case Description: The case concerns violations of a number of Convention rights arising from the fact that the applicant was the victim of an extraordinary rendition operation. The European EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-50873
AUSTRALIA: CONCLUDING OBSERVATIONS
AUSTRALIA: CONCLUDING OBSERVATIONS CRPD/C/AUS/CO/2 3 NULL 2019 10 15T00:00:00 CRPD United Nations CRPD/C/AUS/CO/2 3 Convention on the Rights Distr.: General 15 October 2019 of Persons with Disabilities Original: English Committee on the Rights of Persons UHRICRPD/C/AUS/CO/2-3https://uhri.ohchr.org/en/document/61f3fd5a-723c-4dfe-b63e-38d731efb214
Abdilafir Abubakar Ali and Mayul Ali Mohamad v. Denmark
Abdilafir Abubakar Ali and Mayul Ali Mohamad v. Denmark CCPR/C/116/D/2409/2014 Communication number s : 2409/2014 Author: Abdilafir Abubakar Ali and Mayul Ali Mohamad Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 116 Country Denmark Submission date Date JUTBCCPR/C/116/D/2409/2014https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2134/en-US
Abdilafir Abubakar Ali and Mayul Ali Mohamad v. Denmark
Abdilafir Abubakar Ali and Mayul Ali Mohamad v. Denmark CCPR/C/116/D/2409/2014 Communication number s : 2409/2014 Author: Abdilafir Abubakar Ali and Mayul Ali Mohamad Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 116 Country Denmark Submission date 28 JUTBCCPR/C/116/D/2409/2014https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2178/en-US
Additional Protocol to the European Convention on Mutual Assistance in Criminal Matters (ETS No. 099)
Additional Protocol to the European Convention on Mutual Assistance in Criminal Matters ETS No. 099 099 Strasbourg 1978 03 17T00:00:00 Treaty open for signature by the member States signatories to Treaty ETS 30 and for accession by the non member States COEETS No. 099https://rm.coe.int/1680077975
Ahani v. Canada
Ahani v. Canada CCPR/C/80/D/1051/2002 Communication number s : 1051/2002 Author: Mansour Ahani Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 80 Country Canada Submission date 10 Jan 2002 Date of decision 29 Mar 2004 Comment: Three individual opinions JUTBCCPR/C/80/D/1051/2002https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1108/en-US
Ahmed Souaiene et al. v. Algeria
Ahmed Souaiene et al. v. Algeria CCPR/C/128/D/3082/2017 Communication number s : 3082/2017 Author: Ahmed Souaiene and A cha Souaiene Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 128 Country Algeria Submission date 08 Sep 2017 Date of decision 27 Mar JUTBCCPR/C/128/D/3082/2017https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2873/en-US
Ali Aarrass v. Spain
Ali Aarrass v. Spain CCPR/C/111/D/2008/2010 Communication number s : 2008/2010 Author: Ali Aarrass Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 111 Country Spain Submission date 25 Nov 2010 Date of decision 21 Jul 2014 Comment: This document has no JUTBCCPR/C/111/D/2008/2010https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1860/en-US
Anton v. Algeria
Anton v. Algeria CCPR/C/88/D/1424/2005 Communication number s : 1424/2005 Author: Armand Anton Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 88 Country Algeria Submission date 24 Nov 2004 Date of decision 01 Nov 2006 Comment: In accordance with JUTBCCPR/C/88/D/1424/2005https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1324/en-US
Aponte Guzmán v. Colombia
Aponte Guzm n v. Colombia CCPR/C/81/D/697/1996 Communication number s : 697/1996 Author: Alfonso Aponte Guzm n Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 81 Country Colombia Submission date 03 Nov 1995 Date of decision 05 Jul 2004 Comment: This JUTBCCPR/C/81/D/697/1996https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1065/en-US
Arab Millis v. Algeria
Arab Millis v. Algeria CCPR/C/122/D/2398/2014 Communication number s : 2398/2014 Author: Arab Millis Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 122 Country Algeria Submission date 10 Mar 2014 Date of decision 06 Apr 2018 Comment: This document has no JUTBCCPR/C/122/D/2398/2014https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2486/en-US
Arenz et al. v. Germany
Arenz et al. v. Germany CCPR/C/80/D/1138/2002 Communication number s : 1138/2002 Author: Paul Arenz Thomas R der and Dagmar R der Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 80 Country Germany Submission date 26 Sep 2002 Date of decision 24 Mar JUTBCCPR/C/80/D/1138/2002https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1062/en-US
B.A.E.W. and E.M.W. v. Sweden
B.A.E.W. and E.M.W. v. Sweden CCPR/C/129/D/2744/2016 Communication number s : 2744/2016 Author: B.A.E.W. and E.M.W. Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 129 Country Sweden Submission date 26 Feb 2016 Date of decision 23 Jul 2020 Comment: JUTBCCPR/C/129/D/2744/2016https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2847/en-US
BALSAN v. Romania
BALSAN v. Romania ROU 23/08/2017 00:00:00 15/09/2017 15:07:24 Case Description: This case concerns the failure of the investigating prosecuting and judicial authorities to comply with their positive obligation under Article 3 to protect the applicant from EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-47601
BELGIUM: CONCLUDING OBSERVATIONS
BELGIUM: CONCLUDING OBSERVATIONS CRC/C/BEL/CO/5 6 NULL 2019 02 28T00:00:00 CRC United Nations CRC/C/BEL/CO/5 6 Convention on the Distr.: General 28 February 2019 Rights of the Child Original: English Committee on the Rights of the Child Concluding UHRICRC/C/BEL/CO/5-6https://uhri.ohchr.org/en/document/c82b0164-aa9a-41b3-8fa1-abc3ce70a94f