Search
Data source
EU member states
Other countries
Keywords
Tags
Displaying 881 - 900 of 2119
GREVIO’s (Baseline) Evaluation Report on legislative and other measures giving effect to the provisions of the Council of Europe Convention on Preventing and Combating Violence against Women and Domestic Violence (Istanbul Convention) TURKEY
GREVIO s Baseline Evaluation Report on legislative and other measures giving effect to the provisions of the Council of Europe Convention on Preventing and Combating Violence against Women and Domestic Violence Istanbul Convention TURKEY TUR a15 a22 a25 GREVIOGREVIO-Inf(2018)6_Turkey_Baseline_Evaluation_Report_enghttps://hudoc.grevio.coe.int/eng?i=GREVIO-Inf(2018)6_Turkey_Baseline_Evaluation_Report_eng
Gemma Beasley v. Australia
Gemma Beasley v. Australia CRPD/C/15/D/11/2013 Communication number s : 011/2013 Author: Gemma Beasley Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 15 Country Australia Submission date 29 Apr 2013 Date of decision 01 Apr 2016 Comment: This document has JUTBCRPD/C/15/D/11/2013https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2142/en-US
Government comments on the fourth report on Austria
Government comments on the fourth report on Austria AUT 2009 12 15 2010 03 02 Government comments on the report on AUSTRIA APPENDIX: GOVERNMENT S VIEWPOINT APPENDIXThe following appendix does not form part of ECRI s analysis and proposals concerning the ECRIAUT-COM-IV-2010-002-ENGhttps://hudoc.ecri.coe.int/eng?i=AUT-COM-IV-2010-002-ENG
Government comments on the fourth report on Portugal
Government comments on the fourth report on Portugal PRT 2013 03 21 2013 07 09 APPENDIX: GOVERNMENT S VIEWPOINT The following appendix does not form part of ECRI s analysis and proposals concerning the situation in Portugal ECRI in accordance with its ECRIPRT-COM-IV-2013-020-ENGhttps://hudoc.ecri.coe.int/eng?i=PRT-COM-IV-2013-020-ENG
Government comments on the fourth report on the United Kingdom
Government comments on the fourth report on the United Kingdom GBR 2009 01 17 2010 03 02 Government comments on the report on THE UNITED KINGDOM APPENDIX: GOVERNMENT S VIEWPOINT APPENDIXThe following appendix does not form part of ECRI s analysis and ECRIGBR-COM-IV-2010-004-ENGhttps://hudoc.ecri.coe.int/eng?i=GBR-COM-IV-2010-004-ENG
Government comments on the third report on Austria
Government comments on the third report on Austria AUT 2004 06 25 2005 02 15 APPENDIX The following appendix does not form part of ECRI s analysis and proposals concerning the situation in Austria ECRI wishes to point out that the analysis contained in ECRIAUT-COM-III-2005-001-ENGhttps://hudoc.ecri.coe.int/eng?i=AUT-COM-III-2005-001-ENG
Government comments on the third report on Bulgaria
Government comments on the third report on Bulgaria BGR 2003 06 27 2004 01 27 Government comments on the n report on BULGARIA APPENDIX The following appendix does not form part of ECRI s analysis and proposals concerning the situation in Bulgaria ECRI ECRIBGR-COM-III-2004-002-ENGhttps://hudoc.ecri.coe.int/eng?i=BGR-COM-III-2004-002-ENG
Government comments on the third report on Cyprus
Government comments on the third report on Cyprus CYP 2005 12 16 2006 05 16 APPENDIX The following appendix does not form part of ECRI s analysis and proposals concerning the situation in Cyprus ECRI wishes to point out that the analysis contained in its ECRICYP-COM-III-2006-017-ENGhttps://hudoc.ecri.coe.int/eng?i=CYP-COM-III-2006-017-ENG
Government comments on the third report on Italy
Government comments on the third report on Italy ITA 2005 12 16 2006 05 16 APPENDIX The following appendix does not form part of ECRI s analysis and proposals concerning the situation in Italy ECRI wishes to point out that the analysis contained in its ECRIITA-COM-III-2006-019-ENGhttps://hudoc.ecri.coe.int/eng?i=ITA-COM-III-2006-019-ENG
Government comments on the third report on Romania
Government comments on the third report on Romania ROU 2005 06 24 2006 02 21 APPENDIX The following appendix does not form part of ECRI s analysis and proposals concerning the situation in Romania ECRI wishes to point out that the analysis contained in ECRIROU-COM-III-2006-003-ENGhttps://hudoc.ecri.coe.int/eng?i=ROU-COM-III-2006-003-ENG
Government comments on the third report on “the Former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia”
Government comments on the third report on the Former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia MKD 2004 06 25 2005 02 15 APPENDIX The following appendix does not form part of ECRI s analysis and proposals concerning the situation in the Former Yugoslav Republic of ECRIMKD-COM-III-2005-004-ENGhttps://hudoc.ecri.coe.int/eng?i=MKD-COM-III-2005-004-ENG
Government comments on the third report on the Netherlands
Government comments on the third report on the Netherlands NLD 2007 06 29 2008 02 12 APPENDIX The following appendix does not form part of ECRI s analysis and proposals concerning the situation in the Netherlands ECRI wishes to point out that the analysis ECRINLD-COM-III-2008-003-ENGhttps://hudoc.ecri.coe.int/eng?i=NLD-COM-III-2008-003-ENG
Grishkovtsov v. Belarus
Grishkovtsov v. Belarus CCPR/C/113/D/2013/2010 Communication number s : 2013/2010 Author: Oleg Grishkovtsov Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 113 Country Belarus Submission date 06 Dec 2010 Date of decision 01 Apr 2015 Comment: Imposition of JUTBCCPR/C/113/D/2013/2010https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1915/en-US
H.B.A. et al. v. Canada
H.B.A. et al. v. Canada CAT/C/56/D/536/2013 Communication number s : 536/2013 Author: H.B.A. et al. Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 56 Country Canada Submission date 14 Nov 2012 Date of decision 02 Dec 2015 Comment: This document has JUTBCAT/C/56/D/536/2013https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2070/en-US
H. v. Sweden
H. v. Sweden CAT/C/58/D/627/2014 Communication number s : 627/2014 Author: H. Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 58 Country Sweden Submission date 29 Aug 2014 Date of decision 05 Aug 2016 Comment: This document has no comment: JUTBCAT/C/58/D/627/2014https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/3012/en-US
Himal and Devi Sharma v. Nepal
Himal and Devi Sharma v. Nepal CCPR/C/122/D/2265/2013 Communication number s : 2265/2013 Author: Himal and Devi Sharma Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 122 Country Nepal Submission date 22 Apr 2013 Date of decision 06 Apr 2018 Comment: This JUTBCCPR/C/122/D/2265/2013https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2491/en-US
Human Rights Council adopts outcome of Universal Periodic Review of Qatar, Nicaragua and Italy
The Human Rights Council this morning adopted the outcome of the Universal Periodic Review of Qatar Nicaragua and Italy. Ahmad Bin Abdullah Al Mahmoud Minister of State for Foreign Affairs of Qatar said Qatar paid significant attention to the Universal UPRhttps://www.ohchr.org//en/press-releases/2010/06/human-rights-council-adopts-outcome-universal-periodic-review-qatar
Human Rights Council holds general debate on Universal Periodic Review
Human Rights CouncilMIDDAY 15 March 2019 The Human Rights Council during a midday meeting held a general debate on the Universal Periodic Review. In the discussion speakers said that the Universal Periodic Review was one of the great successes of the UPRhttps://www.ohchr.org//en/news/2019/03/human-rights-council-holds-general-debate-universal-periodic-review
I.A.M. v. Denmark
I.A.M. v. Denmark CRC/C/77/D/3/2016 Communication number s : 003/2016 Author: I.A.M. Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 77 Country Denmark Submission date 12 Feb 2016 Date of decision 25 Jan 2018 Comment: This document has no comment: JUTBCRC/C/77/D/3/2016https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2345/en-US
I.E. v. Switzerland
I.E. v. Switzerland CAT/C/62/D/683/2015 Communication number s : 683/2015 Author: I.E. represented by counsel Tarig Hassan Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 62 Country Switzerland Submission date 26 May 2015 Date of decision 14 Nov 2017 JUTBCAT/C/62/D/683/2015https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2333/en-US