Search
Data source
EU member states
Other countries
Keywords
Tags
Displaying 1 - 20 of 2915
4. International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights
STATUS AS AT : 14 06 2023 09:15:30 EDT CHAPTER IV HUMAN RIGHTS 4. International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights New York 16 December 1966 Entry into force : 23 March 1976 in accordance with article 49 for all provisions except those of article 41 UNIV-4https://treaties.un.org//Pages/ViewDetails.aspx?src=TREATY&mtdsg_no=IV-4&chapter=4&clang=_en
5th Round Evaluation Report on Poland
5th Round Evaluation Report on Poland POL 2018 12 07 2019 01 28 Adoption: 7 December 2018 Publication: 28 January 2019 Public GrecoEval5Rep 2018 1 FIFTH EVALUATION ROUND Preventing corruption and promoting integrity in central governments top executive GRECOGrecoEval5Rep(2018)1-Final-eng-Poland-PUBLIChttps://hudoc.greco.coe.int/eng?i=GrecoEval5Rep(2018)1-Final-eng-Poland-PUBLIC
A. B. A. O. v. France,Tunisia
A. B. A. O. v. France Tunisia CAT/C/39/D/264/2005 Communication number s : 264/2005 Author: A. B. A. O. Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 39 Country France Tunisia Submission date 24 Jan 2005 Date of decision 08 Nov 2007 Comment: This JUTBCAT/C/39/D/264/2005https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/86/en-US
A.B. v. Canada
A.B. v. Canada CCPR/C/117/D/2387/2014 Communication number s : 2387/2014 Author: A.B. represented by counsel Laura Brittain then Benjamin Liston Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 117 Country Canada Submission date 29 Apr 2014 Date of JUTBCCPR/C/117/D/2387/2014https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2197/en-US
A. B. v. Sweden
A. B. v. Sweden CAT/C/54/D/539/2013 Communication number s : 539/2013 Author: A. B. Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 54 Country Sweden Submission date 08 Mar 2013 Date of decision 11 May 2015 Comment: This document has no comment: JUTBCAT/C/54/D/539/2013https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2043/en-US
A.B. v. the Netherlands
A.B. v. the Netherlands NLD 29/04/2002 00:00:00 27/10/2016 17:05:40 Case Description: Protection of correspondence: Unjustified interference due to the control of a detainee s correspondence with the European Commission of Human Rights by prison EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-4373
A.H. v. Denmark
A.H. v. Denmark CCPR/C/114/D/2370/2014 Communication number s : 2370/2014 Author: A.H. represented by counsel Helge N rrung Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 114 Country Denmark Submission date 18 Mar 2014 Date of decision 16 Jul 2015 JUTBCCPR/C/114/D/2370/2014https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1954/en-US
A. K. and A. R. v. Uzbekistan
A. K. and A. R. v. Uzbekistan CCPR/C/95/D/1233/2003 Communication number s : 1233/2003 Author: A. K. and A. R. Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 95 Country Uzbekistan Submission date 09 Jul 2003 Date of decision 31 Mar 2009 Comment: This JUTBCCPR/C/95/D/1233/2003https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1015/en-US
A.M.M. v. Switzerland
A.M.M. v. Switzerland CERD/C/84/D/50/2012 Communication number s : 050/2012 Author: A.M.M. Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 84 Country Switzerland Submission date 08 Jan 2012 Date of decision 18 Feb 2014 Comment: This document has no JUTBCERD/C/84/D/50/2012https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1799/en-US
A.M. v. Australia
A.M. v. Australia CRPD/C/13/D/12/2013 Communication number s : 012/2013 Author: Australian Centre for Disability Law Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 13 Country Australia Submission date 18 Apr 2013 Date of decision 27 Mar 2015 JUTBCRPD/C/13/D/12/2013https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2009/en-US
A.N. v. Russian Federation
A.N. v. Russian Federation CCPR/C/127/D/2518/2014 Communication number s : 2518/2014 Author: A.N. Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 127 Country Russian Federation Submission date 24 Mar 2014 Date of decision 08 Nov 2019 Comment: This JUTBCCPR/C/127/D/2518/2014https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2815/en-US
A. P. v. Ukraine
A. P. v. Ukraine CCPR/C/105/D/1834/2008 Communication number s : 1834/2008 Author: A. P. Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 105 Country Ukraine Submission date 01 Nov 2007 Date of decision 23 Jul 2012 Comment: This document has no JUTBCCPR/C/105/D/1834/2008https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1537/en-US
A.S.G.M. v. Denmark
A.S.G.M. v. Denmark CCPR/C/121/D/2612/2015 Communication number s : 2612/2015 Author: A.S.G.M. Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 121 Country Denmark Submission date 13 May 2015 Date of decision 09 Nov 2017 Comment: This document has no JUTBCCPR/C/121/D/2612/2015https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2356/en-US
A.S. et al. v. Malta
A.S. et al. v. Malta CCPR/C/128/D/3043/2017 Communication number s : 3043/2017 Author: A.S. D.I. O.I. and G.D. Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 128 Country Malta Submission date 19 May 2017 Date of decision 13 Mar 2020 Comment: JUTBCCPR/C/128/D/3043/2017https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/3300/en-US
A.W.K. v. New Zealand
A.W.K. v. New Zealand CCPR/C/112/D/1998/2010 Communication number s : 1998/2010 Author: A.W.K. represented by counsel Frank Deliu Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 112 Country New Zealand Submission date 02 Aug 2010 Date of decision 28 JUTBCCPR/C/112/D/1998/2010https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1896/en-US
A. et al. v. Uzbekistan
A. et al. v. Uzbekistan CCPR/C/98/D/1079/2002 Communication number s : 1079/2002 Author: A. et al. Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 98 Country Uzbekistan Submission date 29 Apr 2002 Date of decision 19 Mar 2010 Comment: This document JUTBCCPR/C/98/D/1079/2002https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1545/en-US
A v. Bosnia and Herzegovina
A v. Bosnia and Herzegovina CAT/C/67/D/854/2017 Communication number s : 854/2017 Author: A represented by counsel Philip Grant of TRIAL International Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 67 Country Bosnia and Herzegovina Submission date 01 Nov JUTBCAT/C/67/D/854/2017https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2623/en-US
AKTAS AND ASLANISKENDER v. Turkey
AKTAS AND ASLANISKENDER v. Turkey TUR 25/09/2019 00:00:00 30/10/2019 17:27:44 Case Description: The case concerns a violation of the right to respect for private life on account of the authorities refusal in 2007 of the applicants request for changing EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-54133
AL-NASHIF v. Bulgaria
AL NASHIF v. Bulgaria BGR 20/09/2002 00:00:00 04/11/2016 14:50:56 Case Description: Lack of protection against arbitrariness in expulsion proceedings based on national security grounds: failure of the authorities to ensure independent supervision of the EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-14665
ANNUAL REPORT OF THE WORKING GROUP ON THE USE OF MERCENARIES AS A MEANS OF VIOLATING HUMAN RIGHTS AND IMPEDING THE EXERCISE OF THE RIGHT OF PEOPLES TO SELF-DETERMINATION ADDENDUM : MISSION TO HONDURAS
ANNUAL REPORT OF THE WORKING GROUP ON THE USE OF MERCENARIES AS A MEANS OF VIOLATING HUMAN RIGHTS AND IMPEDING THE EXERCISE OF THE RIGHT OF PEOPLES TO SELF DETERMINATION ADDENDUM : MISSION TO HONDURAS A/HRC/24/45/Add.1 NULL 2013 08 05T00:00:00 WG UHRIA/HRC/24/45/Add.1https://uhri.ohchr.org/en/document/3da0110e-6a50-4290-bd4f-20e5594b1e7b