Search
Data source
EU member states
Other countries
Keywords
Tags
Displaying 2661 - 2680 of 2688
Working Group on the use of mercenaries as a means of violating human rights and impeding the exercise of the right of peoples to self-determination
Report to HRC A/HRC/39/49/Add.1 from 8 December 2017 to 15 December 2017 7 December 2018 Working Group on the use of mercenaries as a means of violating human rights and impeding the exercise of the right of peoples to self determination Ghana United UNSPA/HRC/39/49/Add.1https://spinternet.ohchr.org/Download.aspx?SymbolNo=A%2fHRC%2f39%2f49%2fAdd.1&Lang=en
Working Group on the use of mercenaries as a means of violating human rights and impeding the exercise of the right of peoples to self-determination
Report to HRC A/HRC/33/43/Add.1 from 1 July 2015 to 8 July 2015 2 August 2016 Working Group on the use of mercenaries as a means of violating human rights and impeding the exercise of the right of peoples to self determination Tunisia United Nations UNSPA/HRC/33/43/Add.1https://spinternet.ohchr.org/Download.aspx?SymbolNo=A%2fHRC%2f33%2f43%2fAdd.1&Lang=en
X.Q.H. v. New Zealand
X.Q.H. v. New Zealand CCPR/C/110/D/2197/2012 Communication number s : 2197/2012 Author: X.Q.H. Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 110 Country New Zealand Submission date 22 Mar 2012 Date of decision 25 Mar 2014 Comment: This document JUTBCCPR/C/110/D/2197/2012https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1821/en-US
X.Q.L. v. Australia
X.Q.L. v. Australia CAT/C/52/D/455/2011 Communication number s : 455/2011 Author: X.Q.L. Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 52 Country Australia Submission date 03 Mar 2011 Date of decision 02 May 2014 Comment: This document has no JUTBCAT/C/52/D/455/2011https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1828/en-US
X. v. Denmark
X. v. Denmark CCPR/C/110/D/2007/2010 Communication number s : 2007/2010 Author: X. Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 110 Country Denmark Submission date 23 Nov 2010 Date of decision 26 Mar 2014 Comment: This document has no comment: JUTBCCPR/C/110/D/2007/2010https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1816/en-US
X. v. Denmark
X. v. Denmark CCPR/C/113/D/2523/2015 Communication number s : 2523/2015 Author: X. Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 113 Country Denmark Submission date 07 Jan 2015 Date of decision 01 Apr 2015 Comment: This document has no comment: JUTBCCPR/C/113/D/2523/2015https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1922/en-US
X v. Finland
X v. Finland FIN 19/11/2012 00:00:00 02/11/2016 10:19:54 Case Description: This case concerns the involuntary confinement of the applicant for care in a mental hospital between 17 February 2005 and 27 January 2006 without sufficient safeguards against EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-5984
X v. Iceland
X v. Iceland CCPR/C/130/D/2818/2016 Communication number s : 2818/2016 Author: X Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 130 Country Iceland Submission date 24 Feb 2016 Date of decision 22 Oct 2020 Comment: Individual opinion of Jos Manuel Santos JUTBCCPR/C/130/D/2818/2016https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/3289/en-US
X v. Netherlands v. Netherlands
X v. Netherlands v. Netherlands CCPR/C/117/D/2729/2016 Communication number s : 2729/2016 Author: X Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 117 Country Netherlands Submission date 01 Feb 2016 Date of decision 14 Jul 2016 Comment: This JUTBCCPR/C/117/D/2729/2016https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2127/en-US
X v. United Republic of Tanzania
X v. United Republic of Tanzania CRPD/C/18/D/22/2014 Communication number s : 022/2014 Author: X Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 20 Country United Republic of Tanzania Submission date 23 Jun 2014 Date of decision 18 Aug 2017 Comment: JUTBCRPD/C/18/D/22/2014https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2390/en-US
XENIDES-ARESTIS v. Turkey
XENIDES ARESTIS v. Turkey TUR 22/03/2006 00:00:00 10/11/2016 16:08:36 Case Description: These cases concern the continuous denial of access to property in the northern part of Cyprus and the consequent loss of control thereof Article 1 of Protocol No. 1 . EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-37308
Y.B. and N.S. v. Belgium
Y.B. and N.S. v. Belgium CRC/C/79/D/12/2017 Communication number s : 012/2017 Author: Y.B. and N.S. Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 79 Country Belgium Submission date 22 Mar 2017 Date of decision 27 Sep 2018 Comment: This document has no JUTBCRC/C/79/D/12/2017https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2421/en-US
Y. Sh. v. Russian Federation
Y. Sh. v. Russian Federation CCPR/C/128/D/2815/2016 Communication number s : 2815/2016 Author: Y. Sh. Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 128 Country Russian Federation Submission date 15 Apr 2016 Date of decision 13 Mar 2020 Comment: JUTBCCPR/C/128/D/2815/2016https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2868/en-US
Y v. United Republic of Tanzania
Y v. United Republic of Tanzania CRPD/C/20/D/23/2014 Communication number s : 023/2014 Author: Y Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 20 Country United Republic of Tanzania Submission date 23 Jun 2014 Date of decision 31 Aug 2018 Comment: This JUTBCRPD/C/20/D/23/2014https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2511/en-US
YEMEN: CONCLUDING OBSERVATIONS
YEMEN: CONCLUDING OBSERVATIONS E/C.12/YEM/CO/3 NULL 2023 03 13T00:00:00 CESCR United Nations E/C.12/YEM/CO/3 Economic and Social Council Distr.: General 23 March 2023 Original: English Committee on Economic Social and Cultural Rights Concluding UHRIE/C.12/YEM/CO/3https://uhri.ohchr.org/en/document/7107bb20-0509-4a23-bfe4-02e5a99e8e2b
YETIS AND OTHERS v. Turkey
YETIS AND OTHERS v. Turkey TUR 06/10/2010 00:00:00 10/11/2016 16:04:14 Case Description: Protection of property: Disproportionate interference on account of failure to pay the difference between the value of the compensation for the expropriation on the EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-37288
YURUKOVA AND SAMUNDZHI v. Bulgaria
YURUKOVA AND SAMUNDZHI v. Bulgaria BGR 02/10/2009 00:00:00 27/10/2016 15:19:52 Case Description: Protection of property: Disproportionate interference in respect of the first applicant as in the restitution proceedings for recovery of property acquired EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-3847
Yashar Agazade and Rasul Jafarov v. Azerbaijan
Yashar Agazade and Rasul Jafarov v. Azerbaijan CCPR/C/118/D/2205/2012 Communication number s : 2205/2012 Author: Yashar Agazade and Rasul Jafarov Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 118 Country Azerbaijan Submission date 02 Nov 2012 Date of JUTBCCPR/C/118/D/2205/2012https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2235/en-US
Yashar Agazade v. Azerbaijan
Yashar Agazade v. Azerbaijan CCPR/C/126/D/2307/2013 Communication number s : 2307/2013 Author: Yashar Agazade Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 126 Country Azerbaijan Submission date 06 Nov 2013 Date of decision 24 Jul 2019 Comment: This JUTBCCPR/C/126/D/2307/2013https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2793/en-US
Z.H. v. Denmark
Z.H. v. Denmark CCPR/C/119/D/2602/2015 Communication number s : 2602/2015 Author: Z.H. Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 119 Country Denmark Submission date 15 Feb 2015 Date of decision 27 Mar 2017 Comment: This document has no comment: JUTBCCPR/C/119/D/2602/2015https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2291/en-US