Search
Data source
EU member states
Other countries
Keywords
Tags
Displaying 1 - 16 of 16
4. International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights
STATUS AS AT : 14 06 2023 09:15:30 EDT CHAPTER IV HUMAN RIGHTS 4. International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights New York 16 December 1966 Entry into force : 23 March 1976 in accordance with article 49 for all provisions except those of article 41 UNIV-4https://treaties.un.org//Pages/ViewDetails.aspx?src=TREATY&mtdsg_no=IV-4&chapter=4&clang=_en
Açikkollu v. Türkiye
A ikkollu v. T rkiye CCPR/C/136/D/3730/2020 Communication number s : 3730/2020 Author: M m ne A ikkollu Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 136 Country T rkiye Submission date 29 Jan 2020 Date of decision 25 Oct 2022 Comment: This document has JUTBCCPR/C/136/D/3730/2020https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/3761/en-US
Abdurasulov et al. v. Kyrgyzstan
Abdurasulov et al. v. Kyrgyzstan CCPR/C/135/D/3200/2018 3207/2018 Communication number s : 3201/2018 3202/2018 3203/2018 3204/2018 3205/2018 3206/2018 3207/2018 3200/2018 Author: Mukhamadrasul Abdurasulov Osmonali Otamirzaev Bakhodir Zhalalov Abdurashit JUTBCCPR/C/135/D/3200/2018-3207/2018https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/3645/en-US
CASE OF ALPEYEVA AND DZHALAGONIYA v. RUSSIA
CASE OF ALPEYEVA AND DZHALAGONIYA v. RUSSIA 7549/09 33330/11 ALPEYEVA L.T. VINOGRADOV A. RUS 6/12/2018 12:00:00 AM Remainder inadmissible Art. 35 Admissibility criteria Art. 35 3 a Manifestly ill founded Art. 35 3 a Ratione materiae Violation of Article 8 ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2018:0612JUD000754909https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-183537
CASE OF I.K. v. AUSTRIA
CASE OF I.K. v. AUSTRIA 2964/12 EINWALLNER D. AUT 3/28/2013 12:00:00 AM Violation of Article 3 Prohibition of torture Article 3 Expulsion Conditional Russia Non pecuniary damage finding of violation sufficient 350 620 216 ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2013:0328JUD000296412https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-117684
CASE OF KOTLYAR v. RUSSIA
CASE OF KOTLYAR v. RUSSIA 38825/16 29722/18 12920/20 VASILYEV I. RUS 7/12/2022 12:00:00 AM Remainder inadmissible Art. 35 Admissibility criteria Art. 35 3 a Manifestly ill founded Art. 35 3 a Ratione materiae Violation of Article 7 No punishment without ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2022:0712JUD003882516https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-218302
CASE OF MACATĖ v. LITHUANIA
CASE OF MACAT v. LITHUANIA 61435/19 MIZARAS V. WINTEMUTE R. DINGILEVSKIS M. LTU 1/23/2023 12:00:00 AM Preliminary objection dismissed Art. 35 Admissibility criteria Art. 35 3 b No significant disadvantage Violation of Article 10 Freedom of expression ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2023:0123JUD006143519https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-222072
CASE OF OVCHARENKO AND KOLOS v. UKRAINE
CASE OF OVCHARENKO AND KOLOS v. UKRAINE 27276/15 33692/15 BUSHCHENKO A. UKR 1/12/2023 12:00:00 AM Remainder inadmissible Art. 35 Admissibility criteria Art. 35 3 a Manifestly ill founded Violation of Article 8 Right to respect for private and family life ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2023:0112JUD002727615https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-222138
CASE OF PETUKHOV v. UKRAINE (No. 2)
CASE OF PETUKHOV v. UKRAINE No. 2 41216/13 BUSHCHENKO A.P. TARAKHKALO M.O. KARAMAN I.V BOYKOVA I.A. UKR 3/12/2019 12:00:00 AM Remainder inadmissible Art. 35 Admissibility criteria Art. 35 3 a Manifestly ill founded Violation of Article 3 Prohibition of ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2019:0312JUD004121613https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-191703
Mursalov et al v. Azerbaijan
Mursalov et al v. Azerbaijan CCPR/C/136/D/3153/2018 Communication number s : 3153/2018 Author: Rovshan Mursalov Fatima Balova Milena Makarenko Basti Rasulova Galina Fazliahmadova and Goderdzi Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 136 Country JUTBCCPR/C/136/D/3153/2018https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/3681/en-US
REPORT OF THE WORKING GROUP ON THE UNIVERSAL PERIODIC REVIEW : JORDAN
REPORT OF THE WORKING GROUP ON THE UNIVERSAL PERIODIC REVIEW : JORDAN A/HRC/25/9 NULL 2014 01 05T00:00:00 UPR United Nations A/HRC/25/9 General Assembly Distr.: General 6 January 2014 Original: English Human Rights Council Twenty fifth session Agenda item UHRIA/HRC/25/9https://uhri.ohchr.org/en/document/821b0d75-8c2d-422a-a65f-8b12e74a6a2e
Report of the Working Group on the Universal Periodic Review BRUNEI DARUSSALAM
Report of the Working Group on the Universal Periodic Review BRUNEI DARUSSALAM A/HRC/42/11 NULL 2019 06 25T00:00:00 UPR United Nations A/HRC/42/11 Distr.: General 25 June 2019 General Assembly Original: English Human Rights Council Forty second session 9 UHRIA/HRC/42/11https://uhri.ohchr.org/en/document/4b79edc3-fd35-416e-8e67-7caaa2086ede
Report of the Working Group on the Universal Periodic Review - Brunei Darussalam
United Nations A/HRC/42/11 General Assembly Distr.: General 25 June 2019 Original: English Human Rights Council Forty second session 9 27 September 2019 Agenda item 6 Universal periodic review Report of the Working Group on the Universal Periodic Review UPRA/HRC/42/11https://www.ohchr.org//en/documents/reports/report-working-group-universal-periodic-review-brunei-darussalam
Report of the Working Group on the Universal Periodic Review - Japan
United Nations A/HRC/37/15 General Assembly Distr.: General 4 January 2018 Original: English Human Rights Council Thirty seventh session 26 February 23 March 2018 Agenda item 6 Universal periodic review Report of the Working Group on the Universal UPRA/HRC/37/15https://www.ohchr.org//en/documents/reports/report-working-group-universal-periodic-review-japan
Report of the Working Group on the Universal Periodic Review Japan
Report of the Working Group on the Universal Periodic Review Japan A/HRC/37/15 NULL 2018 01 04T00:00:00 UPR United Nations A/HRC/37/15 Distr.: General 4 January 2018 General Assembly Original: English Human Rights Council Thirty seventh session 26 UHRIA/HRC/37/15https://uhri.ohchr.org/en/document/8addbe85-7563-414f-869f-ab9efd33ec03
T.C. v. Peru
T.C. v. Peru CAT/C/75/D/930/2019 Communication number s : 930/2019 Author: T.C. Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 75 Country Peru Submission date 31 Aug 2016 Date of decision 04 Nov 2022 Comment: This document has no comment: Substantive JUTBCAT/C/75/D/930/2019https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/3738/en-US