Search
Data source
EU member states
Other countries
Keywords
Tags
Displaying 7441 - 7460 of 7749
V.K.M. v. Sweden
V.K.M. v. Sweden CAT/C/62/D/663/2015 Communication number s : 663/2015 Author: V.K.M. represented by counsel Kristina Tollb ck Type of decision: Discontinuance decision Session No 62 Country Sweden Submission date 24 Feb 2015 Date of decision 06 Nov 2017 JUTBCAT/C/62/D/663/2015https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2337/en-US
V.K. v. Russian Federation
V.K. v. Russian Federation CCPR/C/126/D/2306/2013 Communication number s : 2306/2013 Author: V.K. Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 126 Country Russian Federation Submission date 21 Sep 2013 Date of decision 26 Jul 2019 Comment: This JUTBCCPR/C/126/D/2306/2013https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2895/en-US
V.M., G.M., S.M. and T.M. v. Sweden
V.M. G.M. S.M. and T.M. v. Sweden CAT/C/71/D/883/2018 Communication number s : 883/2018 Author: V.M. G.M. S.M. and T.M. Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 71 Country Sweden Submission date 31 Aug 2018 Date of decision 19 Jul 2021 Comment: JUTBCAT/C/71/D/883/2018https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/3370/en-US
V.M. (NO. 2) v. the United Kingdom
V.M. NO. 2 v. the United Kingdom GBR 25/07/2019 00:00:00 28/08/2019 14:17:16 Case Description: Protection of rights in detention: Unlawful detention pending deportation due to deficiencies in the detention reviews required by domestic law and the lack of EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-52655
V.M. v. Australia
V.M. v. Australia CAT/C/67/D/723/2015 Communication number s : 723/2015 Author: V.M. represented by counsel John Sweeney Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 67 Country Australia Submission date 30 Dec 2015 Date of decision 02 Aug 2019 Comment: JUTBCAT/C/67/D/723/2015https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2626/en-US
V.M. v. Canada
V.M. v. Canada CCPR/C/119/D/2261/2013 Communication number s : 2261/2013 Author: V.M. Type of decision: Discontinuance decision Session No 119 Country Canada Submission date Date of decision 28 Mar 2017 Comment: This document has no comment: Substantive JUTBCCPR/C/119/D/2261/2013https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2296/en-US
V.P. v. Belarus
V.P. v. Belarus CEDAW/C/79/D/131/2018 Communication number s : 131/2018 Author: V.P. Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 79 Country Belarus Submission date 20 Nov 2017 Date of decision 28 Jun 2021 Comment: This document has no comment: JUTBCEDAW/C/79/D/131/2018https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/3042/en-US
V.P. v. Russian Federation
V.P. v. Russian Federation CAT/C/67/D/780/2016 Communication number s : 780/2016 Author: V.P. not represented by counsel Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 67 Country Russian Federation Submission date 21 Jul 2016 Date of decision 26 JUTBCAT/C/67/D/780/2016https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2677/en-US
V.W. v. Germany
V.W. v. Germany CRC/C/87/D/75/2019 Communication number s : 075/2019 Author: M.W. Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 87 Country Germany Submission date 18 Jan 2019 Date of decision 31 May 2021 Comment: This document has no comment: JUTBCRC/C/87/D/75/2019https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2969/en-US
VALDHUTER v. Romania
VALDHUTER v. Romania ROU 27/09/2017 00:00:00 12/10/2017 16:39:24 Case Description: Access to and efficient functioning of justice: Unfair criminal proceedings due to the inability to question a witness whose statements had been taken into account for the EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-47943
VAN DE KOLK v. the Netherlands
VAN DE KOLK v. the Netherlands NLD 28/05/2019 00:00:00 12/06/2019 17:29:15 Case Description: Functioning of justice: Unfair criminal proceedings due to the authorities failure to allow the applicant a suspect of child pornography distribution to be EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-52201
VANUATU: CONCLUDING OBSERVATIONS
VANUATU: CONCLUDING OBSERVATIONS CRPD/C/VUT/CO/1 NULL 2019 05 13T00:00:00 CRPD United Nations CRPD/C/VUT/CO/1 Convention on the Rights Distr.: General 13 May 2019 of Persons with Disabilities Original: English Committee on the Rights of Persons with UHRICRPD/C/VUT/CO/1https://uhri.ohchr.org/en/document/8a2f8e5a-f68a-4045-a365-f48af0fe3f59
VARNAS v. Lithuania
VARNAS v. Lithuania LTU 09/12/2013 00:00:00 27/10/2016 16:57:59 Case Description: Discrimination: Unjustified difference in treatment of remand prisoners compared to convicted prisoners as regards conjugal visits. Article 14 in conjunction with Article 8 EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-4338
VASCENKOVS v. Latvia
VASCENKOVS v. Latvia LVA 15/03/2017 00:00:00 31/03/2017 16:56:44 Case Description: Protection of rights in detention: Lack of justification for the suspicion at the basis of continued pre trial detention. Article 5 3 Status of Execution: Case closed. Main EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-46473
VASHAKIDZE v. Georgia
VASHAKIDZE v. Georgia GEO 28/01/2014 00:00:00 02/11/2016 10:07:28 Case Description: Protection against ill treatment and access to and efficient functioning of justice: Ineffective investigations into the applicant s stabbing and insufficient reasoning EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-5856
VASILESCU v. Belgium
VASILESCU v. Belgium BEL 20/04/2015 00:00:00 25/10/2016 12:18:05 Case Description: These cases concern the inhuman and degrading treatment suffered by the applicants due to the following material conditions of their detention taken as a whole violations EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-1262
VASILICIUC v. the Republic of Moldova
VASILICIUC v. the Republic of Moldova MDA 02/08/2017 00:00:00 25/10/2017 10:22:51 Case Description: Protection of rights in detention: Arbitrary detention abroad on the basis of an international arrest warrant issued by Interpol at the request of the EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-48057
VASILKOSKI AND OTHERS v. the former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia
VASILKOSKI AND OTHERS v. the former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia MKD 28/01/2011 00:00:00 02/11/2016 10:31:05 Case Description: These cases concern violations of the applicants right to liberty on account of the lack of concrete and sufficient grounds EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-6538
VEDAT DOGRU v. Turkey
VEDAT DOGRU v. Turkey TUR 12/09/2016 00:00:00 10/11/2016 11:15:36 Case Description: Protection of rights in detention: delayed examination of the lawfulness of the applicant s arrest and detention in Tuzla Prison as he could not be brought before the EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-36661
VEISS v. Latvia
VEISS v. Latvia LVA 28/04/2014 00:00:00 03/11/2016 17:30:55 Case Description: Functioning of justice: Excessive length of civil and administrative proceedings concerning the applicant s paternity claims and resulting contact rights with the child. Article EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-12696