Search
Data source
EU member states
Other countries
Keywords
Tags
Displaying 1 - 20 of 767
A.B. v. Canada
A.B. v. Canada CCPR/C/117/D/2387/2014 Communication number s : 2387/2014 Author: A.B. represented by counsel Laura Brittain then Benjamin Liston Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 117 Country Canada Submission date 29 Apr 2014 Date of JUTBCCPR/C/117/D/2387/2014https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2197/en-US
A.K. v. Australia
A.K. v. Australia CAT/C/32/D/148/1999 Communication number s : 148/1999 Author: A.K. Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 32 Country Australia Submission date 13 Oct 1999 Date of decision 05 May 2004 Comment: Under rule 108 9 the State party JUTBCAT/C/32/D/148/1999https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/152/en-US
AFANASYEV v. Ukraine
AFANASYEV v. Ukraine UKR 05/07/2005 00:00:00 08/11/2016 10:44:14 Case Description: These cases concern physical or psychological torture and/or ill treatment by the police mostly in order to obtain confessions substantive violations of Article 3 lack of EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-31348
Alberto Velásquez Echeverri v. Colombia
Alberto Vel squez Echeverri v. Colombia CCPR/C/129/D/2931/2017 Communication number s : 2931/2017 Author: Alberto Vel squez Echeverri Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 129 Country Colombia Submission date 01 Aug 2016 Date of decision 21 Jul JUTBCCPR/C/129/D/2931/2017https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2863/en-US
Alger v. Australia
Alger v. Australia CCPR/C/120/D/2237/2013 Communication number s : 2237/2013 Author: Christopher Alger Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 120 Country Australia Submission date 30 Mar 2012 Date of decision 13 Jul 2017 Comment: Individual JUTBCCPR/C/120/D/2237/2013https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2315/en-US
B.S. v. Canada
B.S. v. Canada CAT/C/27/D/166/2000 Communication number s : 166/2000 Author: B.S. Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 27 Country Canada Submission date 22 Apr 1999 Date of decision 14 Nov 2001 Comment: This document has no comment: Substantive JUTBCAT/C/27/D/166/2000https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/178/en-US
Bakhtiyari v. Australia
Bakhtiyari v. Australia CCPR/C/79/D/1069/2002 Communication number s : 1069/2002 Author: Ali Aqsar Bakhtiyari and Roqaiha Bakhtiyari Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 79 Country Australia Submission date 25 Mar 2002 Date of decision 29 Oct JUTBCCPR/C/79/D/1069/2002https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1092/en-US
Brough v. Australia
Brough v. Australia CCPR/C/86/D/1184/2003 Communication number s : 1184/2003 Author: Corey Brough Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 86 Country Australia Submission date 04 Mar 2003 Date of decision 17 Mar 2006 Comment: Pursuant to rule 90 of JUTBCCPR/C/86/D/1184/2003https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1241/en-US
C. v. Australia
C. v. Australia CCPR/C/76/D/900/1999 Communication number s : 900/1999 Author: C. Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 76 Country Australia Submission date 23 Nov 1999 Date of decision 28 Oct 2002 Comment: Under rule 85 of the Committee s rules JUTBCCPR/C/76/D/900/1999https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1026/en-US
CASE OF A. v. FRANCE
CASE OF A. v. FRANCE 14838/89 N/A FRA 11/23/1993 12:00:00 AM Preliminary objection rejected out of time Preliminary objection rejected non exhaustion Violation of Art. 8 Non pecuniary damage finding of violation sufficient Costs and expenses partial award ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:1993:1123JUD001483889https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-57848
CASE OF A. v. THE UNITED KINGDOM
CASE OF A. v. THE UNITED KINGDOM 25599/94 N/A GBR 9/23/1998 12:00:00 AM Violation of Art. 3 Not necessary to examine Art. 8 Not necessary to examine Art. 13 Not necessary to examine Art. 14 Non pecuniary damage financial award Costs and expenses partial ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:1998:0923JUD002559994https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-58232
CASE OF ABDULAZIZ, CABALES AND BALKANDALI v. THE UNITED KINGDOM
CASE OF ABDULAZIZ CABALES AND BALKANDALI v. THE UNITED KINGDOM 9214/80 9473/81 9474/81 N/A GBR 5/28/1985 12:00:00 AM Violation of Art. 14 8 Violation of Art. 13 Non pecuniary damage finding of violation sufficient Costs and expenses award Convention ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:1985:0528JUD000921480https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-57416
CASE OF ABENAVOLI v. ITALY
CASE OF ABENAVOLI v. ITALY 25587/94 ITA 9/2/1997 12:00:00 AM Violation of Art. 6 1 Pecuniary damage claim dismissed Non pecuniary damage financial award Costs and expenses award Convention proceedings 445 13 406 216 ECLI:CE:ECHR:1997:0902JUD002558794 DE ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:1997:0902JUD002558794https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-58190
CASE OF ACQUAVIVA v. FRANCE
CASE OF ACQUAVIVA v. FRANCE 19248/91 N/A FRA 11/21/1995 12:00:00 AM No violation of Art. 6 1 445 76 41 101 406 ECLI:CE:ECHR:1995:1121JUD001924891 COURT CHAMBER CASE OF ACQUAVIVA v. FRANCE Application no. 19248/91 JUDGMENT STRASBOURG 21 November 1995 In ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:1995:1121JUD001924891https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-57950
CASE OF ADOLF v. AUSTRIA
CASE OF ADOLF v. AUSTRIA 8269/78 N/A AUT 3/26/1982 12:00:00 AM No violation of Art. 6 Austrian Penal Code Section 42 445 136 70 325 ECLI:CE:ECHR:1982:0326JUD000826978 COURT CHAMBER CASE OF ADOLF v. AUSTRIA Application no. 8269/78 JUDGMENT STRASBOURG 26 ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:1982:0326JUD000826978https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-57417
CASE OF ADVANCE PHARMA SP. Z O.O v. POLAND
CASE OF ADVANCE PHARMA SP. Z O.O v. POLAND 1469/20 G SIOROWSKA M. METELSKA J. POL 2/3/2022 12:00:00 AM Preliminary objection joined to merits and dismissed Art. 35 Admissibility criteria Art. 35 1 Exhaustion of domestic remedies Violation of Article 6 ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2022:0203JUD000146920https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-215388
CASE OF AHMED AND OTHERS v. THE UNITED KINGDOM
CASE OF AHMED AND OTHERS v. THE UNITED KINGDOM 22954/93 N/A GBR 9/2/1998 12:00:00 AM No violation of Art. 10 No violation of Art. 11 No violation of P1 3 Local Government and Housing Act 1989 sections 1 5 2 2 2 3 Schedule to the Local Government Officers ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:1998:0902JUD002295493https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-58222
CASE OF AHMED v. AUSTRIA
CASE OF AHMED v. AUSTRIA 25964/94 N/A AUT 12/17/1996 12:00:00 AM Lack of jurisdiction new complaint Violation of Art. 3 Pecuniary damage claim dismissed Non pecuniary damage finding of violation sufficient Costs and expenses partial award domestic ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:1996:1217JUD002596494https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-58001
CASE OF AHMET SADIK v. GREECE
CASE OF AHMET SADIK v. GREECE 18877/91 N/A GRC 11/15/1996 12:00:00 AM Preliminary objection allowed non exhaustion of domestic remedies Constitution 1975 Articles 14 para. 1 and 28 para. 1 Criminal Code Articles 162 189 190 191 para. 1 and 192 Code of ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:1996:1115JUD001887791https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-58066
CASE OF AIR CANADA v. THE UNITED KINGDOM
CASE OF AIR CANADA v. THE UNITED KINGDOM 18465/91 N/A GBR 5/5/1995 12:00:00 AM No violation of P1 1 No violation of Art. 6 1 Customs and Excise Management Act 1979 sections 139 1 and 5 141 1 142 152 Schedule 3 paras. 6 7 and 16 1952 Act on customs 1876 ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:1995:0505JUD001846591https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-57939