Search
Data source
EU member states
Other countries
Keywords
Tags
Displaying 1 - 20 of 2960
A.J. v. United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland
A.J. v. United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland CEDAW/C/74/D/126/2018 Communication number s : 126/2018 Author: A.J. Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 74 Country United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland JUTBCEDAW/C/74/D/126/2018https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2666/en-US
A.M. v. Switzerland
A.M. v. Switzerland CAT/C/65/D/841/2017 Communication number s : 841/2017 Author: A.M. represented by counsel Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 65 Country Switzerland Submission date 04 Sep 2017 Date of decision 15 Nov 2018 Comment: Decision JUTBCAT/C/65/D/841/2017https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2475/en-US
A. S. v. Russian Federation
A. S. v. Russian Federation CERD/C/79/D/45/2009 Communication number s : 045/2009 Author: A. S. Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 79 Country Russian Federation Submission date 20 Aug 2009 Date of decision 26 Aug 2011 Comment: This JUTBCERD/C/79/D/45/2009https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1726/en-US
AHMET YILDIRIM v. Turkey
AHMET YILDIRIM v. Turkey TUR 18/03/2013 00:00:00 10/11/2016 15:53:30 Case Description: These cases concern a violation of the applicants right to freedom of expression on account of domestic court orders blocking access to Google Sites and YouTube EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-37256
AINSWORTH v. the United Kingdom
AINSWORTH v. the United Kingdom GBR 27/01/2000 00:00:00 26/10/2016 20:41:06 Case Description: Access to and effective functioning of justice: Unfair proceedings before the Court Marial due to its lack of impartiality and independence and absence of a EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-2532
ALTINAY v. Turkey
ALTINAY v. Turkey TUR 09/10/2013 00:00:00 10/11/2016 16:04:14 Case Description: Discrimination in conjunction with the right to education: unforeseeable change in the rules on access to university several years after the applicant had made his educational EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-37284
ANDREY YAKOVENKO v. Ukraine
ANDREY YAKOVENKO v. Ukraine UKR 13/06/2014 00:00:00 07/11/2016 13:42:50 Case Description: Protection against ill treatment right to liberty and security as well as functioning of justice: Poor material conditions in detention and in transit between EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-26019
ASSOCIATION FOR EUROPEAN INTEGRATION AND HUMAN RIGHTS & EKIMDZHIEV v. Bulgaria
ASSOCIATION FOR EUROPEAN INTEGRATION AND HUMAN RIGHTS EKIMDZHIEV v. Bulgaria BGR 30/01/2008 00:00:00 27/10/2016 15:19:52 Case Description: These cases concern the lack of sufficient safeguards against the risk of abuse which is inherent in every secret EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-3669
Aden et al. v. Denmark
Aden et al. v. Denmark CCPR/C/126/D/2531/2015 Communication number s : 2531/2015 Author: Nimo Mohamed Aden and Liban Muhammed Hassan Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 126 Country Denmark Submission date 15 Sep 2014 Date of decision 25 Jul JUTBCCPR/C/126/D/2531/2015https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2791/en-US
Allakulov v. Uzbekistan
Allakulov v. Uzbekistan CCPR/C/120/D/2430/2014 Communication number s : 2430/2014 Author: Khidirnazar Allakulov Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 120 Country Uzbekistan Submission date 09 Sep 2011 Date of decision 19 Jul 2017 Comment: This JUTBCCPR/C/120/D/2430/2014https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2318/en-US
Amanda Jane Mellet v. Ireland
Amanda Jane Mellet v. Ireland CCPR/C/116/D/2324/2013 Communication number s : 2324/2013 Author: Amanda Jane Mellet Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 116 Country Ireland Submission date 11 Nov 2013 Date of decision 31 Mar 2016 Comment: This JUTBCCPR/C/116/D/2324/2013https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2152/en-US
B.A.E.W. and E.M.W. v. Sweden
B.A.E.W. and E.M.W. v. Sweden CCPR/C/129/D/2744/2016 Communication number s : 2744/2016 Author: B.A.E.W. and E.M.W. Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 129 Country Sweden Submission date 26 Feb 2016 Date of decision 23 Jul 2020 Comment: JUTBCCPR/C/129/D/2744/2016https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2847/en-US
BAJIC v. North Macedonia
BAJIC v. North Macedonia MKD 10/09/2021 00:00:00 23/09/2021 15:54:44 Case Description: This case concerns a violation of the applicant s right to a fair trial due to the failure of the Supreme Court to communicate to the applicant the public prosecutor s EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-58423
BAKA v. Hungary
BAKA v. Hungary HUN 23/06/2016 00:00:00 02/11/2016 16:32:51 Case Description: The European Court found violations of the Convention on account of the undue and premature termination of the applicants mandates as President Baka case and Vice President Erm EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-10859
BALITSKIY v. Ukraine
BALITSKIY v. Ukraine UKR 03/02/2012 00:00:00 08/11/2016 10:28:05 Case Description: This group of cases concerns the convictions of the applicants between 2002 and 2011 on the basis of self incriminating statements made in the absence of a lawyer and in EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-31116
BAYAV v. Turkey
BAYAV v. Turkey TUR 22/02/2012 00:00:00 10/11/2016 11:35:29 Case Description: Access to and efficient functioning of justice: Denial of a fair trial on account of the absence of a hearing in compensation proceedings for both pecuniary and non pecuniary EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-36752
BEUZE v. Belgium
BEUZE v. Belgium BEL 09/11/2018 00:00:00 16/11/2018 14:46:27 Case Description: Access to and efficient functioning of justice: Unfairness of criminal proceedings as a whole due to the fact that procedural defects which had occurred at pre trial stage EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-50769
BOROTYUK v. Ukraine
BOROTYUK v. Ukraine UKR 16/03/2011 00:00:00 07/11/2016 12:29:57 Case Description: Access to and efficient functioning of justice and protection of rights in detention: Unfair proceedings resulting in convictions on the basis of self incriminating EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-25337
BRAGADIREANU v. Romania
BRAGADIREANU v. Romania ROU 06/03/2008 00:00:00 03/11/2016 17:43:49 Case Description: This group currently consisting of 121 judgments 1 mainly concerns the inhuman and/or degrading treatment suffered by the applicants due to overcrowding and poor EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-12985
BRODA AND BOJARA v. Poland
BRODA AND BOJARA v. Poland POL 29/09/2021 00:00:00 22/10/2021 14:42:32 Case Description: The Reczkowicz group concerns infringements of the right to a tribunal established by law due to the fact that the judges of the various chambers in the Supreme Court EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-58717