Search
Data source
EU member states
Other countries
Keywords
Tags
Displaying 1 - 20 of 26
11. Convention on the Rights of the Child
STATUS AS AT : 14 06 2023 09:15:30 EDT CHAPTER IV HUMAN RIGHTS 11. Convention on the Rights of the Child New York 20 November 1989 Entry into force : 2 September 1990 in accordance with article 49 1 . Registration : 2 September 1990 No. 27531 Status : UNIV-11https://treaties.un.org//Pages/ViewDetails.aspx?src=TREATY&mtdsg_no=IV-11&chapter=4&clang=_en
A.W.K. v. New Zealand
A.W.K. v. New Zealand CCPR/C/112/D/1998/2010 Communication number s : 1998/2010 Author: A.W.K. represented by counsel Frank Deliu Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 112 Country New Zealand Submission date 02 Aug 2010 Date of decision 28 JUTBCCPR/C/112/D/1998/2010https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1896/en-US
CASE OF AL-KHAWAJA AND TAHERY v. THE UNITED KINGDOM
CASE OF AL KHAWAJA AND TAHERY v. THE UNITED KINGDOM 26766/05 22228/06 BURCOMBE A. WELLS D. BENNATHAN J. FISHER M. TROWLER R. GBR 12/15/2011 12:00:00 AM No violation of Art. 6 1 6 3 d Violation of Art. 6 1 6 3 d Non pecuniary damage award Criminal justice ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2011:1215JUD002676605https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-108072
CASE OF BIG BROTHER WATCH AND OTHERS v. THE UNITED KINGDOM
CASE OF BIG BROTHER WATCH AND OTHERS v. THE UNITED KINGDOM 58170/13 62322/14 24960/15 CAREY D. CURLING R. NORTON E. GBR 9/13/2018 12:00:00 AM Remainder inadmissible Art. 35 Admissibility criteria Art. 35 3 a Manifestly ill founded Violation of Article 8 ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2018:0913JUD005817013https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-186048
CASE OF BIG BROTHER WATCH AND OTHERS v. THE UNITED KINGDOM
CASE OF BIG BROTHER WATCH AND OTHERS v. THE UNITED KINGDOM 58170/13 62322/14 24960/15 CAREY D. CURLING R. NORTON E. GBR 5/25/2021 12:00:00 AM Preliminary objection dismissed Art. 34 Individual applications Art. 34 Victim Violation of Article 8 Right to ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2021:0525JUD005817013https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-210077
CASE OF CARSON AND OTHERS v. THE UNITED KINGDOM
CASE OF CARSON AND OTHERS v. THE UNITED KINGDOM 42184/05 OTTY T. OLBOURNE B. TUNLEY M. P. GRAY H. GBR 3/16/2010 12:00:00 AM Preliminary objection dismissed non exhaustion of domestic remedies Preliminary objection allowed non exhaustion of domestic ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2010:0316JUD004218405https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-97704
CASE OF FAYED v. THE UNITED KINGDOM
CASE OF FAYED v. THE UNITED KINGDOM 17101/90 N/A GBR 9/21/1994 12:00:00 AM Preliminary objection rejected non exhaustion No violation of Art. 6 1 Not necessary to examine Art. 13 Companies Act 1985 Sections 432 para. 2 434 436 437 para. 3 c 14 128 445 7 ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:1994:0921JUD001710190https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-57890
CASE OF HANIF AND KHAN v. THE UNITED KINGDOM
CASE OF HANIF AND KHAN v. THE UNITED KINGDOM 52999/08 61779/08 HOWELLS GBR 12/20/2011 12:00:00 AM Violation of Art. 6 1 Pecuniary and non pecuniary damage finding of violation sufficient Juries Act 1974 1974 Act 445 76 180 216 ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2011:1220JUD005299908https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-108168
CASE OF HASSAN v. THE UNITED KINGDOM
CASE OF HASSAN v. THE UNITED KINGDOM 29750/09 SHINER P. OTTY T. HICKMAN T. GBR 9/16/2014 12:00:00 AM Remainder inadmissible No violation of Article 5 Right to liberty and security Article 5 1 Deprivation of liberty Lawful arrest or detention No violation ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2014:0916JUD002975009https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-146501
CASE OF ILIAS AND AHMED v. HUNGARY
CASE OF ILIAS AND AHMED v. HUNGARY 47287/15 POH RNOK B. HUN 11/21/2019 12:00:00 AM Preliminary objection allowed Art. 35 Admissibility criteria Art. 35 1 Six month period Remainder inadmissible Art. 35 Admissibility criteria Art. 35 3 a Ratione materiae ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2019:1121JUD004728715https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-198760
CASE OF THE SUNDAY TIMES v. THE UNITED KINGDOM (No. 1)
CASE OF THE SUNDAY TIMES v. THE UNITED KINGDOM No. 1 6538/74 N/A GBR 4/26/1979 12:00:00 AM Violation of Art. 10 No violation of Art. 14 10 Not necessary to examine Art. 18 Just satisfaction reserved 149 148 201 316 265 379 343 100 232 ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:1979:0426JUD000653874https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-57584
Cayzer v. Australia
Cayzer v. Australia CCPR/C/135/D/2981/2017 Communication number s : 2981/2017 Author: Graham Cayzer Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 135 Country Australia Submission date 13 Jul 2016 Date of decision 25 Jul 2022 Comment: This document has JUTBCCPR/C/135/D/2981/2017https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/3676/en-US
E. B. v. New Zealand
E. B. v. New Zealand CCPR/C/89/D/1368/2005 Communication number s : 1368/2005 Author: E. B. Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 89 Country New Zealand Submission date 24 Dec 2004 Date of decision 16 Mar 2007 Comment: An individual opinion JUTBCCPR/C/89/D/1368/2005https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1333/en-US
J. S. v. New Zealand
J. S. v. New Zealand CCPR/C/104/D/1752/2008 Communication number s : 1752/2008 Author: J. S. Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 104 Country New Zealand Submission date 03 Oct 2007 Date of decision 26 Mar 2012 Comment: This document has JUTBCCPR/C/104/D/1752/2008https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1316/en-US
L.F. v. New Zealand
L.F. v. New Zealand CCPR/C/113/D/2211/2012 Communication number s : 2211/2012 Author: L.F. Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 118 Country New Zealand Submission date 03 Jun 2012 Date of decision 30 Mar 2015 Comment: This document has no JUTBCCPR/C/113/D/2211/2012https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1958/en-US
M.T. v. Uzbekistan
M.T. v. Uzbekistan CCPR/C/114/D/2234/2013 Communication number s : 2234/2013 Author: M.T. Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 114 Country Uzbekistan Submission date 18 Dec 2012 Date of decision 23 Jul 2015 Comment: This document has no JUTBCCPR/C/114/D/2234/2013https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2015/en-US
Manuel v. New Zealand
Manuel v. New Zealand CCPR/C/91/D/1385/2005 Communication number s : 1385/2005 Author: Benjamin Manuel Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 91 Country New Zealand Submission date 06 Apr 2005 Date of decision 18 Oct 2007 Comment: This document JUTBCCPR/C/91/D/1385/2005https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1379/en-US
REPORT OF THE SPECIAL RAPPORTEUR ON EXTRAJUDICIAL, SUMMARY OR ARBITRARY EXECUTIONS, PHILIP ALSTON : ADDENDUM : MISSION TO THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
REPORT OF THE SPECIAL RAPPORTEUR ON EXTRAJUDICIAL SUMMARY OR ARBITRARY EXECUTIONS PHILIP ALSTON : ADDENDUM : MISSION TO THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA A/HRC/11/2/Add.5 NULL 2009 05 28T06:00:00 SR Summary executions UNITED NATIONS A Distr. GENERAL General UHRIA/HRC/11/2/Add.5https://uhri.ohchr.org/en/document/ed0057a5-9c04-4e11-8e9d-9b274f9da5f2
REPORT OF THE SPECIAL RAPPORTEUR ON THE RIGHT OF EVERYONE TO THE ENJOYMENT OF THE HIGHEST ATTAINABLE STANDARD OF PHYSICAL AND MENTAL HEALTH, ANAND GROVER: ADDENDUM: MISSION TO AZERBAIJAN (16–23 MAY 2012)
REPORT OF THE SPECIAL RAPPORTEUR ON THE RIGHT OF EVERYONE TO THE ENJOYMENT OF THE HIGHEST ATTAINABLE STANDARD OF PHYSICAL AND MENTAL HEALTH ANAND GROVER: ADDENDUM: MISSION TO AZERBAIJAN 16 23 MAY 2012 A/HRC/23/41/Add.1 NULL 2013 05 03T00:00:00 SR Health UHRIA/HRC/23/41/Add.1https://uhri.ohchr.org/en/document/eba1efe3-95ec-4699-a9c8-e8abcada718b
REPORT OF THE WORKING GROUP ON THE UNIVERSAL PERIODIC REVIEW : RUSSIAN FEDERATION
REPORT OF THE WORKING GROUP ON THE UNIVERSAL PERIODIC REVIEW : RUSSIAN FEDERATION A/HRC/11/19 NULL 2009 05 29T00:00:00 UPR United Nations A/HRC/11/19 General Assembly Distr.: General 5 October 2009 Original: English Human Rights Council Eleventh session UHRIA/HRC/11/19https://uhri.ohchr.org/en/document/7147e458-2da3-4253-91ea-ae55f755545f