Search
Data source
EU member states
Other countries
Keywords
Tags
Displaying 1 - 20 of 37
A.F. v. Italy
A.F. v. Italy CEDAW/C/82/D/148/2019 Communication number s : 148/2019 Author: A.F. Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 82 Country Italy Submission date 16 Aug 2018 Date of decision 20 Jun 2022 Comment: This document has no comment: Substantive JUTBCEDAW/C/82/D/148/2019https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/3205/en-US
Alzery v. Sweden
Alzery v. Sweden CCPR/C/88/D/1416/2005 Communication number s : 1416/2005 Author: Mohammed Alzery Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 88 Country Sweden Submission date 29 Jul 2005 Date of decision 25 Oct 2006 Comment: Pursuant to rule 90 of JUTBCCPR/C/88/D/1416/2005https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1300/en-US
Baroy v. Philippines
Baroy v. Philippines CCPR/C/79/D/1045/2002 Communication number s : 1045/2002 Author: Alfredo Baroy Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 79 Country Philippines Submission date 04 Jan 2002 Date of decision 31 Oct 2003 Comment: Under rule JUTBCCPR/C/79/D/1045/2002https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/372/en-US
CASE OF CARSON AND OTHERS v. THE UNITED KINGDOM
CASE OF CARSON AND OTHERS v. THE UNITED KINGDOM 42184/05 OTTY T. OLBOURNE B. TUNLEY M. P. GRAY H. GBR 3/16/2010 12:00:00 AM Preliminary objection dismissed non exhaustion of domestic remedies Preliminary objection allowed non exhaustion of domestic ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2010:0316JUD004218405https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-97704
CASE OF J. AND OTHERS v. AUSTRIA
CASE OF J. AND OTHERS v. AUSTRIA 58216/12 Weiss A. AUT 1/17/2017 12:00:00 AM Remainder inadmissible No violation of Article 4 Prohibition of slavery and forced labour Article 4 Positive obligations Article 4 1 Trafficking in human beings No violation of ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2017:0117JUD005821612https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-170388
CASE OF MIAILHE v. FRANCE (No. 1)
CASE OF MIAILHE v. FRANCE No. 1 12661/87 N/A FRA 2/25/1993 12:00:00 AM Preliminary objection rejected non exhaustion Violation of Art. 8 Not necessary to examine Art. 13 Just satisfaction reserved Customs Code Articles 64 453 454 458 Budget Act of 30 ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:1993:0225JUD001266187https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-57811
CASE OF SILIADIN v. FRANCE
CASE OF SILIADIN v. FRANCE 73316/01 CLEMENT H. FRA 7/26/2005 12:00:00 AM Preliminary objection joined to merits and rejected victim Violation of Art. 4 Costs and expenses award Convention proceedings Criminal Code former Articles 225 13 225 14 Information ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2005:0726JUD007331601https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-69891
CONSIDERATION OF REPORTS SUBMITTED BY STATES PARTIES UNDER ARTICLE 74 OF THE CONVENTION : INTERNATIONAL CONVENTION ON THE PROTECTION OF THE RIGHTS OF ALL MIGRANT WORKERS AND MEMBERS OF THEIR FAMILIES : CONCLUDING OBSERVATIONS OF THE COMMITTEE ON THE
CONSIDERATION OF REPORTS SUBMITTED BY STATES PARTIES UNDER ARTICLE 74 OF THE CONVENTION : INTERNATIONAL CONVENTION ON THE PROTECTION OF THE RIGHTS OF ALL MIGRANT WORKERS AND MEMBERS OF THEIR FAMILIES : CONCLUDING OBSERVATIONS OF THE COMMITTEE ON THE UHRICMW/C/PHL/CO/1https://uhri.ohchr.org/en/document/9ad341cb-0b39-4c55-b9ff-8bd69a64ad46
Cagas et al. v. Philippines
Cagas et al. v. Philippines CCPR/C/73/D/788/1997 Communication number s : 788/1997 Author: Geniuval M. Cagas Wilson Butin and Julio Astillero Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 73 Country Philippines Submission date 17 Jun 1996 Date of JUTBCCPR/C/73/D/788/1997https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/946/en-US
Carpo et al. v. Philippines
Carpo et al. v. Philippines CCPR/C/77/D/1077/2002 Communication number s : 1077/2002 Author: Jaime Carpo Oscar Ibao Warlito Ibao and Roche Ibao Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 77 Country Philippines Submission date 06 May 2002 Date of JUTBCCPR/C/77/D/1077/2002https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1046/en-US
Chan v. Guyana
Chan v. Guyana CCPR/C/85/D/913/2000 Communication number s : 913/2000 Author: Lawrence Chan Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 85 Country Guyana Submission date 15 Sep 1998 Date of decision 31 Oct 2005 Comment: Under rule 92 the Committee JUTBCCPR/C/85/D/913/2000https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1229/en-US
Ernazarov v. Kyrgyzstan v. Kyrgyzstan
Ernazarov v. Kyrgyzstan v. Kyrgyzstan CCPR/C/113/D/2054/2011 Communication number s : 2054/2011 Author: Mamatkarim Ernazarov Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 113 Country Kyrgyzstan Submission date 11 Mar 2011 Date of decision 25 Mar 2015 JUTBCCPR/C/113/D/2054/2011https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1961/en-US
Evelio Ramón Giménez v. Paraguay
Evelio Ram n Gim nez v. Paraguay CCPR/C/123/D/2372/2014 Communication number s : 2372/2014 Author: Evelio Ram n Gim nez Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 123 Country Paraguay Submission date 30 Jul 2013 Date of decision 25 Jul 2018 Comment: JUTBCCPR/C/123/D/2372/2014https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2542/en-US
Fatima Mehalli v. Algeria
Fatima Mehalli v. Algeria CCPR/C/110/D/1900/2009 Communication number s : 1900/2009 Author: Fatima Mehalli represented by counsel the Collectif des familles de disparu e s en Alg rie Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 110 Country Algeria JUTBCCPR/C/110/D/1900/2009https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1807/en-US
L.O. et al. v. Switzerland
L.O. et al. v. Switzerland CEDAW/C/76/D/124/2018 Communication number s : 124/2018 Author: L.O. et al. Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 76 Country Switzerland Submission date 31 Dec 2017 Date of decision 06 Jul 2020 Comment: This JUTBCEDAW/C/76/D/124/2018https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/3038/en-US
Mikhalenya and Mikhalenya v. Belarus
Mikhalenya and Mikhalenya v. Belarus CCPR/C/132/D/3105/2018 Communication number s : 3105/2018 Author: Andrei Mikhalenya also on behalf of his son Aleksei Mikhalenya Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 132 Country Belarus Submission date 30 JUTBCCPR/C/132/D/3105/2018https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/3184/en-US
Natalya Pinchuk v. Belarus
Natalya Pinchuk v. Belarus CCPR/C/112/D/2165/2012 Communication number s : 2165/2012 Author: Natalya Pinchuk represented by counsel Antoine Bernard Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 112 Country Belarus Submission date 12 Apr 2012 Date of JUTBCCPR/C/112/D/2165/2012https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1938/en-US
REPORT OF THE SPECIAL RAPPORTEUR ON VIOLENCE AGAINST WOMEN, ITS CAUSES AND CONSEQUENCES, YAKIN ERTURK : ADDENDUM : MISSION TO SAUDI ARABIA
REPORT OF THE SPECIAL RAPPORTEUR ON VIOLENCE AGAINST WOMEN ITS CAUSES AND CONSEQUENCES YAKIN ERTURK : ADDENDUM : MISSION TO SAUDI ARABIA A/HRC/11/6/Add.3 NULL 2009 04 14T06:00:00 SR Violence against women UNITED NATIONS A Distr. GENERAL General Assembly UHRIA/HRC/11/6/Add.3https://uhri.ohchr.org/en/document/e0bb5167-cc15-4fbd-8577-8eebe2d5baf6
REPORT OF THE WORKING GROUP ON THE UNIVERSAL PERIODIC REVIEW : ARGENTINA
REPORT OF THE WORKING GROUP ON THE UNIVERSAL PERIODIC REVIEW : ARGENTINA A/HRC/22/4 NULL 2012 12 12T00:00:00 UPR United Nations A/HRC/22/4 General Assembly Distr.: General 12 December 2012 Original: English Human Rights Council Twenty second session UHRIA/HRC/22/4https://uhri.ohchr.org/en/document/9f88c47a-ab53-46b7-9663-9cce56abebe8
REPORT OF THE WORKING GROUP ON THE UNIVERSAL PERIODIC REVIEW : MAURITIUS
REPORT OF THE WORKING GROUP ON THE UNIVERSAL PERIODIC REVIEW : MAURITIUS A/HRC/25/8 NULL 2013 12 25T00:00:00 UPR United Nations A/HRC/25/8 General Assembly Distr.: General 26 December 2013 Original: English Human Rights Council Twenty fifth session Agenda UHRIA/HRC/25/8https://uhri.ohchr.org/en/document/2f3e6e72-f5a8-4a14-92df-80609e9a45f5