Search
Data source
EU member states
Other countries
Keywords
Tags
Displaying 321 - 340 of 533
European Convention on the Supervision of Conditionally Sentenced or Conditionally Released Offenders (ETS No. 051)
European Convention on the Supervision of Conditionally Sentenced or Conditionally Released Offenders ETS No. 051 051 Strasbourg 1964 11 30T00:00:00 Treaty open for signature by the member States and for accession by non member States Strasbourg 1975 08 COEETS No. 051https://rm.coe.int/168006ff4d
Evloev v. Kazakhstan
Evloev v. Kazakhstan CAT/C/51/D/441/2010 Communication number s : 441/2010 Author: Oleg Evloev Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 51 Country Kazakhstan Submission date 20 Dec 2010 Date of decision 05 Nov 2013 Comment: This document has no JUTBCAT/C/51/D/441/2010https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/5/en-US
F.A. v. Russian Federation
F.A. v. Russian Federation CCPR/C/123/D/2189/2012 Communication number s : 2189/2012 Author: F.A. Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 123 Country Russian Federation Submission date 09 Aug 2012 Date of decision 27 Jul 2018 Comment: Individual JUTBCCPR/C/123/D/2189/2012https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2539/en-US
F.C.B. v. Italy
F.C.B. v. Italy ITA 28/08/1991 00:00:00 28/11/2016 11:43:17 Case Description: Access to and efficient functioning of justice: Unfairness of in absentia criminal proceedings due to impossibility of obtaining a fresh examination by a court of the merits of EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-45056
FANIEL v. Belgium
FANIEL v. Belgium BEL 01/06/2011 00:00:00 25/10/2016 14:46:28 Case Description: Access to and efficient functioning of justice: Denial of access to court due to the applicant s lack of information on relevant formalities and time limits to lodge an appeal EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-1537
FOURTH EVALUATION ROUND Corruption prevention in respect of members of parliament, judges and prosecutors EVALUATION REPORT RUSSIAN FEDERATION
FOURTH EVALUATION ROUND Corruption prevention in respect of members of parliament judges and prosecutors EVALUATION REPORT RUSSIAN FEDERATION RUS 2017 10 18 2018 03 22 TABLE OF CONTENTS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY I. INTRODUCTION AND METHODOLOGY II. CONTEXT III. GRECOGrecoEval4Rep-2017-2-eng-Final-RussianFed-PUBLIChttps://hudoc.greco.coe.int/eng?i=GrecoEval4Rep-2017-2-eng-Final-RussianFed-PUBLIC
FYODOROV AND FYODOROVA v. Ukraine
FYODOROV AND FYODOROVA v. Ukraine UKR 07/10/2011 00:00:00 08/11/2016 10:44:14 Case Description: The case concerns the ill treatment of both applicants husband and wife on account of the disproportionate use of force by the police on 7 March 2003 when EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-31579
Fourth Opinion on Croatia
Fourth Opinion on Croatia HRV ACFC/OP/IV 2015 005rev 2015 11 18 ADVISORY COMMITTEE ON THE FRAMEWORK CONVENTION FOR THE PROTECTION OF NATIONAL MINORITIES Strasbourg 29 November 2016 ACFC/OP/IV 2015 005rev Fourth Opinion on Croatia adopted on 18 November FCNMACFC/OP/IV(2015)005revhttps://hudoc.fcnm.coe.int/eng?i=4th_OP_Croatia_rev_en
G.W.J. v. Australia
G.W.J. v. Australia CAT/C/72/D/856/2017 Communication number s : 856/2017 Author: G.W.J. Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 72 Country Australia Submission date 07 Dec 2017 Date of decision 12 Nov 2021 Comment: This document has no comment: JUTBCAT/C/72/D/856/2017https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/3347/en-US
GAGA v. Romania
GAGA v. Romania ROU 29/09/2008 00:00:00 06/11/2016 16:19:47 Case Description: Denial of a fair trial due to conviction in absentia by the Supreme Court of Justice due to an error in the service of the summons to appear in court Status of Execution: EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-17504
GAKHARIA v. Georgia
GAKHARIA v. Georgia GEO 17/04/2017 00:00:00 03/05/2017 11:45:10 Case Description: Access to and efficient functioning of justice: Unfair proceedings due to the infringement of the principle of equality of arms and adversarial proceedings in the first case EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-46769
GUMENIUC v. the Republic of Moldova
GUMENIUC v. the Republic of Moldova MDA 16/08/2017 00:00:00 20/09/2017 18:11:03 Case Description: Protection of rights in detention: Arbitrary and unjustifiable administrative detention following the applicant s failure to pay a minimal fine for speeding EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-47633
Gabriel Osío Zamora v. Venezuela (Bolivarian Republic of)
Gabriel Os o Zamora v. Venezuela Bolivarian Republic of CCPR/C/121/D/2203/2012 Communication number s : 2203/2012 Author: Gabriel Os o Zamora Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 121 Country Venezuela Bolivarian Republic of Submission date 25 JUTBCCPR/C/121/D/2203/2012https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2349/en-US
Government comments on the first report on Turkey
Government comments on the first report on Turkey TUR 1998 11 28 1999 11 09 APPENDIX The following appendix does not form part of ECRI s analysis and proposals concerning the situation in Turkey ECRI wishes to point out that the analysis contained in its ECRITUR-COM-I-1999-052-ENGhttps://hudoc.ecri.coe.int/eng?i=TUR-COM-I-1999-052-ENG
Gratzinger v. Czech Republic
Gratzinger v. Czech Republic CCPR/C/91/D/1463/2006 Communication number s : 1463/2006 Author: Peter and Eva Gratzinger Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 91 Country Czech Republic Submission date 12 Feb 2006 Date of decision 25 Oct 2007 JUTBCCPR/C/91/D/1463/2006https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1383/en-US
H.B.H. et al. v. Switzerland
H.B.H. et al. v. Switzerland CAT/C/30/D/192/2001 Communication number s : 192/2001 Author: H.B. H. T.N. T. H.J. H. H.O. H. H.R. H. and H.G. H. Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 30 Country Switzerland Submission date 15 Oct 2001 Date of JUTBCAT/C/30/D/192/2001https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/173/en-US
H.R.E.S. v. Switzerland
H.R.E.S. v. Switzerland CAT/C/64/D/783/2016 Communication number s : 783/2016 Author: H.R.E.S. represented by counsel Angela Stettler and Urs Ebn ther Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 64 Country Switzerland Submission date 15 Nov 2016 Date JUTBCAT/C/64/D/783/2016https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2466/en-US
HAKIMI v. Belgium
HAKIMI v. Belgium BEL 29/09/2010 00:00:00 25/10/2016 14:46:28 Case Description: Access to and efficient functioning of justice: Denial of access to a court due to the refusal by the court of appeal to reopen in absentia proceedings although the default EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-1562
HARALAMPIEV v. Bulgaria
HARALAMPIEV v. Bulgaria BGR 24/09/2012 00:00:00 04/11/2016 14:40:21 Case Description: Denial of a fair trial due to the unjustified refusals by the Supreme Court of Cassation to reopen criminal proceedings having resulted in the applicant s convictions in EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-14509
Hamadie Al-Gertani v. Bosnia and Herzegovina
Hamadie Al Gertani v. Bosnia and Herzegovina CCPR/C/109/D/1955/2010 Communication number s : 1955/2010 Author: Zeyad Khalaf Hamadie Al Gertani Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 109 Country Bosnia and Herzegovina Submission date 04 Jun 2010 JUTBCCPR/C/109/D/1955/2010https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1690/en-US