Search
Data source
EU member states
Other countries
Keywords
Tags
Displaying 1 - 20 of 73
11. Convention on the Rights of the Child
STATUS AS AT : 14 06 2023 09:15:30 EDT CHAPTER IV HUMAN RIGHTS 11. Convention on the Rights of the Child New York 20 November 1989 Entry into force : 2 September 1990 in accordance with article 49 1 . Registration : 2 September 1990 No. 27531 Status : UNIV-11https://treaties.un.org//Pages/ViewDetails.aspx?src=TREATY&mtdsg_no=IV-11&chapter=4&clang=_en
15. Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities
STATUS AS AT : 14 06 2023 09:15:30 EDT CHAPTER IV HUMAN RIGHTS 15. Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities New York 13 December 2006 Entry into force : 3 May 2008 in accordance with article 45 1 . Registration : 3 May 2008 No. 44910 Status : UNIV-15https://treaties.un.org//Pages/ViewDetails.aspx?src=TREATY&mtdsg_no=IV-15&chapter=4&clang=_en
8. Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Discrimination against Women
STATUS AS AT : 14 06 2023 09:15:30 EDT CHAPTER IV HUMAN RIGHTS 8. Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Discrimination against Women New York 18 December 1979 1 Entry into force : 3 September 1981 in accordance with article 27 1 . Registration : 3 UNIV-8https://treaties.un.org//Pages/ViewDetails.aspx?src=TREATY&mtdsg_no=IV-8&chapter=4&clang=_en
Alzery v. Sweden
Alzery v. Sweden CCPR/C/88/D/1416/2005 Communication number s : 1416/2005 Author: Mohammed Alzery Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 88 Country Sweden Submission date 29 Jul 2005 Date of decision 25 Oct 2006 Comment: Pursuant to rule 90 of JUTBCCPR/C/88/D/1416/2005https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1300/en-US
Aumeeruddy-Cziffra et al. v. Mauritius
Aumeeruddy Cziffra et al. v. Mauritius CCPR/C/12/D/35/1978 Communication number s : 035/1978 Author: Shirin Aumeeruddy Cziffra and 19 other Mauritian women Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 12 Country Mauritius Submission date 02 May 1978 JUTBCCPR/C/12/D/35/1978https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/319/en-US
CASE OF BABAR AHMAD AND OTHERS v. THE UNITED KINGDOM
CASE OF BABAR AHMAD AND OTHERS v. THE UNITED KINGDOM 24027/07 11949/08 36742/08 66911/09 67354/09 PEIRCE G. COOPER B. ARANI M. JONES A. BRANDON B. RAJA A. JONES J. GBR 4/10/2012 12:00:00 AM Remainder inadmissible No violation of Article 3 Prohibition of ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2012:0410JUD002402707https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-110267
CASE OF GEORGIA v. RUSSIA (II)
CASE OF GEORGIA v. RUSSIA II 38263/08 RUS 1/21/2021 12:00:00 AM Preliminary objections dismissed Art. 35 Admissibility criteria Art. 35 1 Exhaustion of domestic remedies Remainder inadmissible Art. 35 Admissibility criteria Art. 35 3 a Ratione loci ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2021:0121JUD003826308https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-207757
CASE OF HARKINS AND EDWARDS v. THE UNITED KINGDOM
CASE OF HARKINS AND EDWARDS v. THE UNITED KINGDOM 9146/07 32650/07 Aslam Y. Rasool L. GBR 1/17/2012 12:00:00 AM Remainder inadmissible No violation of Article 3 Prohibition of torture Article 3 Extradition Conditional United States of America No violation ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2012:0117JUD000914607https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-108599
CASE OF SUKHOVETSKYY v. UKRAINE
CASE OF SUKHOVETSKYY v. UKRAINE 13716/02 N/A UKR 3/28/2006 12:00:00 AM No violation of P1 3 Not necessary to examine under Art. 14 P1 3 Article 43 of the Law on Parliamentary Elections 2001 Article 24 of the Constitution 343 100 353 574 476 ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2006:0328JUD001371602https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-72893
CASE OF T. v. THE UNITED KINGDOM
CASE OF T. v. THE UNITED KINGDOM 24724/94 N/A GBR 12/16/1999 12:00:00 AM Preliminary objection dismissed Article 35 1 Exhaustion of domestic remedies No violation of Article 3 Prohibition of torture Article 3 Degrading treatment Inhuman treatment ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:1999:1216JUD002472494https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-58593
CASE OF V. v. THE UNITED KINGDOM
CASE OF V. v. THE UNITED KINGDOM 24888/94 N/A GBR 12/16/1999 12:00:00 AM Preliminary objection dismissed Article 35 1 Exhaustion of domestic remedies No violation of Article 3 Prohibition of torture Article 3 Degrading treatment Inhuman treatment ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:1999:1216JUD002488894https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-58594
CONCLUDING OBSERVATIONS OF THE COMMITTEE AGAINST TORTURE : MAURITIUS
CONCLUDING OBSERVATIONS OF THE COMMITTEE AGAINST TORTURE : MAURITIUS CAT/C/MUS/CO/3 NULL 2011 06 15T00:00:00 CAT United Nations CAT/C/MUS/CO/3 Distr.: General Convention against Torture 15 June 2011 and Other Cruel Inhuman Original: English or Degrading UHRICAT/C/MUS/CO/3https://uhri.ohchr.org/en/document/3cbfb3a4-9d04-4469-8989-fc571e322aa4
Concluding Observations on the 4th Periodic Report of Mauritius: Committee against Torture
Concluding Observations on the 4th Periodic Report of Mauritius: Committee against Torture CAT/C/MUS/CO/4 NULL 2017 12 22T00:00:00 CAT United Nations CAT/C/MUS/CO/4 Distr.: General Convention against Tortureand Other Cruel Inhumanor 22 December 2017 UHRICAT/C/MUS/CO/4https://uhri.ohchr.org/en/document/a9f41eb5-ce72-40de-b6f8-45beffb5fde7
Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms (ETS No. 005)
Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms ETS No. 005 005 Rome 1950 11 04T00:00:00 Treaty open for signature by the member States of the Council of Europe and for accession by the European Union Rome 1953 09 03T00:00:00 10 COEETS No. 005https://rm.coe.int/1680a2353d
D.V. and H.V. v. Czech Republic
D.V. and H.V. v. Czech Republic CCPR/C/105/D/1848/2008 Communication number s : 1848/2008 Author: D.V. and H.V. Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 105 Country Czech Republic Submission date 07 Sep 2006 Date of decision 23 Jul 2012 JUTBCCPR/C/105/D/1848/2008https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1343/en-US
G. K. v. Netherlands
G. K. v. Netherlands CCPR/C/104/D/1801/2008 Communication number s : 1801/2008 Author: G. K. Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 104 Country Netherlands Submission date 30 Jul 2008 Date of decision 22 Mar 2012 Comment: Pursuant to rule 90 of JUTBCCPR/C/104/D/1801/2008https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1660/en-US
Gillot et al. v. France
Gillot et al. v. France CCPR/C/75/D/932/2000 Communication number s : 932/2000 Author: Marie H l ne Gillot et al. Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 75 Country France Submission date 25 Jun 1999 Date of decision 15 Jul 2002 Comment: This JUTBCCPR/C/75/D/932/2000https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1011/en-US
Goyet v. France
Goyet v. France CCPR/C/94/D/1746/2008 Communication number s : 1746/2008 Author: Farida Goyet Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 94 Country France Submission date 25 Jun 2007 Date of decision 30 Oct 2008 Comment: Pursuant to rule 90 of JUTBCCPR/C/94/D/1746/2008https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1468/en-US
Independent Expert on the enjoyment of all human rights by older persons
Report to HRC A/HRC/30/43/ADD.3 from 28 April 2015 to 8 May 2015 12 August 2015 Independent Expert on the enjoyment of all human rights by older persons Mauritius United Nations A/HRC/30/43/Add.3 General Assembly Distr.: General 12 August 2015 Original: UNSPA/HRC/30/43/ADD.3https://spinternet.ohchr.org/Download.aspx?SymbolNo=A/HRC/30/43/ADD.3&Lang=en
Love et al. v. Australia
Love et al. v. Australia CCPR/C/77/D/983/2001 Communication number s : 983/2001 Author: John K. Love William L. Bone William J. Craig and Peter B. Ivanoff Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 77 Country Australia Submission date 01 Aug 1997 JUTBCCPR/C/77/D/983/2001https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1044/en-US