Search
Data source
EU member states
Other countries
Keywords
Tags
Displaying 1 - 20 of 107
A.R. v. Sweden
A.R. v. Sweden CAT/C/27/D/170/2001 Communication number s : 170/2001 Author: A.R. Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 27 Country Sweden Submission date 27 Apr 2000 Date of decision 23 Nov 2001 Comment: This document has no comment: JUTBCAT/C/27/D/170/2001https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/189/en-US
Agiza v. Sweden
Agiza v. Sweden CAT/C/34/D/233/2003 Communication number s : 233/2003 Author: Ahmed Hussein Mustafa Kamil Agiza Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 34 Country Sweden Submission date 25 Jun 2003 Date of decision 20 May 2005 Comment: Decision on JUTBCAT/C/34/D/233/2003https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/140/en-US
CASE OF BIG BROTHER WATCH AND OTHERS v. THE UNITED KINGDOM
CASE OF BIG BROTHER WATCH AND OTHERS v. THE UNITED KINGDOM 58170/13 62322/14 24960/15 CAREY D. CURLING R. NORTON E. GBR 5/25/2021 12:00:00 AM Preliminary objection dismissed Art. 34 Individual applications Art. 34 Victim Violation of Article 8 Right to ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2021:0525JUD005817013https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-210077
CASE OF GEORGIA v. RUSSIA (II)
CASE OF GEORGIA v. RUSSIA II 38263/08 RUS 1/21/2021 12:00:00 AM Preliminary objections dismissed Art. 35 Admissibility criteria Art. 35 1 Exhaustion of domestic remedies Remainder inadmissible Art. 35 Admissibility criteria Art. 35 3 a Ratione loci ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2021:0121JUD003826308https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-207757
CASE OF GLASER v. THE UNITED KINGDOM
CASE OF GLASER v. THE UNITED KINGDOM 32346/96 N/A GBR 9/19/2000 12:00:00 AM No violation of Art. 8 No violation of Art. 6 1 No violation of Art. 9 Family Law Act 1986 Ss. 25 29 34 154 152 310 445 7 40 136 406 451 425 ECLI:CE:ECHR:2000:0919JUD003234696 ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2000:0919JUD003234696https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-59080
CASE OF ILIAS AND AHMED v. HUNGARY
CASE OF ILIAS AND AHMED v. HUNGARY 47287/15 POH RNOK B. HUN 11/21/2019 12:00:00 AM Preliminary objection allowed Art. 35 Admissibility criteria Art. 35 1 Six month period Remainder inadmissible Art. 35 Admissibility criteria Art. 35 3 a Ratione materiae ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2019:1121JUD004728715https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-198760
CASE OF OTHMAN (ABU QATADA) v. THE UNITED KINGDOM
CASE OF OTHMAN ABU QATADA v. THE UNITED KINGDOM 8139/09 PEIRCE G. FITZGERALD E. QC HUSAIN R. QC FRIEDMAN D. GBR 1/17/2012 12:00:00 AM No violation of Article 3 Prohibition of torture Article 3 Expulsion Conditional Jordan No violation of Article 3 13 ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2012:0117JUD000813909https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-108629
CASE OF SARGSYAN v. AZERBAIJAN
CASE OF SARGSYAN v. AZERBAIJAN 40167/06 GASPARYAN N. OHANYAN K. AZE 6/16/2015 12:00:00 AM Preliminary objection dismissed Article 35 1 Exhaustion of domestic remedies Preliminary objection dismissed Article 35 3 Continuing situation Preliminary objection ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2015:0616JUD004016706https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-155662
CASE OF TËRSHANA v. ALBANIA
CASE OF T RSHANA v. ALBANIA 48756/14 MARKU N. ALB 8/4/2020 12:00:00 AM Preliminary objections dismissed Art. 35 Admissibility criteria Art. 35 1 Exhaustion of domestic remedies Art. 35 1 Six month period No violation of Article 2 Right to life Article 2 ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2020:0804JUD004875614https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-203825
El Khalek Attia v. Sweden
El Khalek Attia v. Sweden CAT/C/31/D/199/2002 Communication number s : 199/2002 Author: Hanan Ahmed Fouad Abd El Khalek Attia Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 31 Country Sweden Submission date 28 Dec 2001 Date of decision 17 Nov 2003 JUTBCAT/C/31/D/199/2002https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/156/en-US
GREVIO’s (Baseline) Evaluation Report on legislative and other measures giving effect to the provisions of the Council of Europe Convention on Preventing and Combating Violence against Women and Domestic Violence (Istanbul Convention) - GEORGIA
GREVIO s Baseline Evaluation Report on legislative and other measures giving effect to the provisions of the Council of Europe Convention on Preventing and Combating Violence against Women and Domestic Violence Istanbul Convention GEORGIA GEO a17 a19 a27 GREVIOGREVIO-Inf(2022)28_Georgia_Baseline_Evaluation_Report_enghttps://hudoc.grevio.coe.int/eng?i=GREVIO-Inf(2022)28_Georgia_Baseline_Evaluation_Report_eng
Giri v. Nepal
Giri v. Nepal CCPR/C/101/D/1761/2008 Communication number s : 1761/2008 Author: Yubraj Giri Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 101 Country Nepal Submission date 14 Jan 2008 Date of decision 24 Mar 2011 Comment: This document has no comment: JUTBCCPR/C/101/D/1761/2008https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1664/en-US
H.K. v. Denmark
H.K. v. Denmark CRC/C/90/D/99/2019 Communication number s : 99/2019 Author: H.K. Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 90 Country Denmark Submission date 29 Aug 2019 Date of decision 01 Jun 2022 Comment: This document has no comment: Substantive JUTBCRC/C/90/D/99/2019https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/3446/en-US
Human Rights Council holds Panel discussion on Nelson Mandela International Day
Human Rights Council AFTERNOON 21 September 2012 Concludes General Debate on Human Rights Bodies and Mechanisms and on the Universal Periodic Review The Human Rights Council this afternoon held a panel discussion on Nelson Mandela International Day after UPRhttps://www.ohchr.org//en/press-releases/2012/09/human-rights-council-holds-panel-discussion-nelson-mandela-international-day
Independent Expert on the enjoyment of human rights by persons with albinism
Report to HRC A/HRC/40/62/Add.1 from 27 November 2017 to 7 December 2017 15 January 2019 Independent Expert on the enjoyment of human rights by persons with albinism Fiji United Nations A/HRC/40/62/Add.1 General Assembly Distr.: General 15 January 2019 UNSPA/HRC/40/62/Add.1https://spinternet.ohchr.org/Download.aspx?SymbolNo=A%2fHRC%2f40%2f62%2fAdd.1&Lang=en
Kaur v. Canada,India
Kaur v. Canada India CCPR/C/94/D/1455/2006 Communication number s : 1455/2006 Author: Surinder Kaur Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 94 Country Canada India Submission date 24 Feb 2006 Date of decision 30 Oct 2008 Comment: On 27 JUTBCCPR/C/94/D/1455/2006https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1474/en-US
M.Z.B.M. v. Denmark
M.Z.B.M. v. Denmark CCPR/C/119/D/2593/2015 Communication number s : 2593/2015 Author: M.Z.B.M. Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 119 Country Denmark Submission date 31 Mar 2015 Date of decision 20 Mar 2017 Comment: This document has no JUTBCCPR/C/119/D/2593/2015https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2240/en-US
N.P.S.S. and M.K. v. Canada
N.P.S.S. and M.K. v. Canada CCPR/C/125/D/2238/2013 Communication number s : 2238/2013 Author: N.P.S.S. and M.K. Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 125 Country Canada Submission date 13 Mar 2013 Date of decision 29 Mar 2019 Comment: This JUTBCCPR/C/125/D/2238/2013https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/3093/en-US
P.V. v. Australia
P.V. v. Australia CAT/C/60/D/708/2015 Communication number s : 708/2015 Author: P.V. Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 60 Country Australia Submission date 20 Oct 2015 Date of decision 12 May 2017 Comment: This document has no comment: JUTBCAT/C/60/D/708/2015https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/3427/en-US
Pathmini Peiris v. Sri Lanka
Pathmini Peiris v. Sri Lanka CCPR/C/103/D/1862/2009 Communication number s : 1862/2009 Author: Annakkarage Suranjini Sadamali Pathmini Peiris Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 103 Country Sri Lanka Submission date 06 Feb 2009 Date of JUTBCCPR/C/103/D/1862/2009https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1387/en-US