Search
Data source
EU member states
Other countries
Keywords
Tags
Displaying 1 - 20 of 83
Benítez Gamarra v. Paraguay
Ben tez Gamarra v. Paraguay CCPR/C/104/D/1829/2008 Communication number s : 1829/2008 Author: Ernesto Ben tez Gamarra Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 104 Country Paraguay Submission date 25 Aug 2008 Date of decision 22 Mar 2012 Comment: JUTBCCPR/C/104/D/1829/2008https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1222/en-US
CASE OF ÖCALAN v. TURKEY
CASE OF CALAN v. TURKEY 46221/99 KENTRIDGE Sir Sydney MULLER Mark OTTY Timothy TUGLUK Aysel TUR 5/12/2005 12:00:00 AM Preliminary objection dismissed Article 35 1 Exhaustion of domestic remedies Violation of Article 5 Right to liberty and security Article ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2005:0512JUD004622199https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-69022
CASE OF CATAN AND OTHERS v. THE REPUBLIC OF MOLDOVA AND RUSSIA
CASE OF CATAN AND OTHERS v. THE REPUBLIC OF MOLDOVA AND RUSSIA 43370/04 18454/06 8252/05 POSTICA A. MANOLE I. HUGHES P. DUFFY H. MDA RUS 10/19/2012 12:00:00 AM Preliminary objection dismissed Remainder inadmissible No violation of Article 2 of Protocol ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2012:1019JUD004337004https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-114082
CASE OF CHRISTINE GOODWIN v. THE UNITED KINGDOM
CASE OF CHRISTINE GOODWIN v. THE UNITED KINGDOM 28957/95 N/A GBR 7/11/2002 12:00:00 AM Violation of Art. 8 Violation of Art. 12 No separate issue under Art. 14 No violation of Art. 13 Non pecuniary damage finding of violation sufficient Costs and expenses ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2002:0711JUD002895795https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-60596
CASE OF DE HAES AND GIJSELS v. BELGIUM
CASE OF DE HAES AND GIJSELS v. BELGIUM 19983/92 N/A BEL 2/24/1997 12:00:00 AM Violation of Art. 10 Violation of Art. 6 1 Pecuniary damage financial award Non pecuniary damage finding of violation sufficient Costs and expenses award domestic proceedings ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:1997:0224JUD001998392https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-58015
CASE OF DJAVIT AN v. TURKEY
CASE OF DJAVIT AN v. TURKEY 20652/92 N/A TUR 2/20/2003 12:00:00 AM Preliminary objections rejected State responsibility non exhaustion of domestic remedies Not necessary to examine Art. 10 Violation of Art. 11 Violation of Art. 13 Pecuniary damage claim ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2003:0220JUD002065292https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-60953
CASE OF GLASER v. THE UNITED KINGDOM
CASE OF GLASER v. THE UNITED KINGDOM 32346/96 N/A GBR 9/19/2000 12:00:00 AM No violation of Art. 8 No violation of Art. 6 1 No violation of Art. 9 Family Law Act 1986 Ss. 25 29 34 154 152 310 445 7 40 136 406 451 425 ECLI:CE:ECHR:2000:0919JUD003234696 ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2000:0919JUD003234696https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-59080
CASE OF HIRST v. THE UNITED KINGDOM (No. 2)
CASE OF HIRST v. THE UNITED KINGDOM No. 2 74025/01 ABRAHAMSON E. GBR 10/6/2005 12:00:00 AM Violation of P1 3 No separate issue under Art. 14 No separate issue under Art. 10 Non pecuniary damage finding of violation sufficient Costs and expenses domestic ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2005:1006JUD007402501https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-70442
CASE OF ILAŞCU AND OTHERS v. MOLDOVA AND RUSSIA
CASE OF ILA CU AND OTHERS v. MOLDOVA AND RUSSIA 48787/99 N/A MDA RUS 7/8/2004 12:00:00 AM Remainder inadmissible No violation of Article 3 Prohibition of torture Article 3 Degrading treatment Inhuman treatment Substantive aspect the Republic of Moldova ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2004:0708JUD004878799https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-61886
CASE OF KONONOV v. LATVIA
CASE OF KONONOV v. LATVIA 36376/04 IOFFE M. LVA 7/24/2008 12:00:00 AM Violation of Art. 7 Non pecuniary damage award Soviet Criminal Code of 1926 Articles 2 4 14 and 193 Criminal Code of 1961 Articles 45 72 226 and 256 Latvian Criminal Code of 1998 ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2008:0724JUD003637604https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-87934
CASE OF KONSTANTIN MARKIN v. RUSSIA
CASE OF KONSTANTIN MARKIN v. RUSSIA 30078/06 MOSKALENKO K. LISMAN N GERASIMOVA I. RUS 3/22/2012 12:00:00 AM Preliminary objection dismissed Article 34 Victim Preliminary objection dismissed Article 37 1 b Matter resolved Remainder inadmissible Violation ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2012:0322JUD003007806https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-109868
CASE OF N. v. FINLAND
CASE OF N. v. FINLAND 38885/02 BERGMAN THOMAS FIN 7/26/2005 12:00:00 AM Violation of Art. 3 if expelled No separate issue under Art. 8 Non pecuniary damage finding of violation sufficient Aliens Act 1991 Aliens Act 2004 350 90 193 492 451 425 429 216 ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2005:0726JUD003888502https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-69908
CASE OF NIKULA v. FINLAND
CASE OF NIKULA v. FINLAND 31611/96 N/A FIN 3/21/2002 12:00:00 AM Violation of Art. 10 Pecuniary damage financial award Non pecuniary damage financial award Costs and expenses partial award Penal Code chapter 27 section 2 149 148 316 265 579 379 216 ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2002:0321JUD003161196https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-60333
CASE OF O'KEEFFE v. IRELAND
CASE OF O KEEFFE v. IRELAND 35810/09 CANTILLON E. IRL 1/28/2014 12:00:00 AM Preliminary objection dismissed Article 35 1 Exhaustion of domestic remedies Preliminary objection dismissed Article 34 Victim Preliminary objection joined to merits and dismissed ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2014:0128JUD003581009https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-140235
CASE OF SARGSYAN v. AZERBAIJAN
CASE OF SARGSYAN v. AZERBAIJAN 40167/06 GASPARYAN N. OHANYAN K. AZE 6/16/2015 12:00:00 AM Preliminary objection dismissed Article 35 1 Exhaustion of domestic remedies Preliminary objection dismissed Article 35 3 Continuing situation Preliminary objection ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2015:0616JUD004016706https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-155662
CASE OF SAUNDERS v. THE UNITED KINGDOM
CASE OF SAUNDERS v. THE UNITED KINGDOM 19187/91 N/A GBR 12/17/1996 12:00:00 AM Violation of Art. 6 1 Pecuniary damage claim dismissed Non pecuniary damage finding of violation sufficient Costs and expenses partial award Convention proceedings Court of ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:1996:1217JUD001918791https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-58009
CASE OF SAVICKIS AND OTHERS v. LATVIA
CASE OF SAVICKIS AND OTHERS v. LATVIA 49270/11 NIKU CEVA I. LVA 6/9/2022 12:00:00 AM Struck out of the list Art. 37 Striking out applications general Art. 37 1 Striking out applications Art. 37 1 c Continued examination not justified No violation of ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2022:0609JUD004927011https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-217963
CASE OF ZDANOKA v. LATVIA
CASE OF ZDANOKA v. LATVIA 58278/00 N/A LVA 6/17/2004 12:00:00 AM Preliminary objection rejected victim Violation of P1 3 Violation of Art. 11 Not necessary to examine Art. 10 Pecuniary damage financial award Non pecuniary damage financial award Costs and ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2004:0617JUD005827800https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-61827
CONSIDERATION OF REPORTS SUBMITTED BY STATES PARTIES UNDER ARTICLE 44 OF THE CONVENTION : CONVENTION ON THE RIGHTS OF THE CHILD : CONCLUDING OBSERVATIONS : KENYA
CONSIDERATION OF REPORTS SUBMITTED BY STATES PARTIES UNDER ARTICLE 44 OF THE CONVENTION : CONVENTION ON THE RIGHTS OF THE CHILD : CONCLUDING OBSERVATIONS : KENYA CRC/C/KEN/CO/2 NULL 2007 06 21T06:00:00 CRC UNITED NATIONS CRC Distr. GENERAL Convention on UHRICRC/C/KEN/CO/2https://uhri.ohchr.org/en/document/f5179b5b-b3b1-49ab-ad75-4ba053c38cef
Human Rights Council holds Panel discussion on Nelson Mandela International Day
Human Rights Council AFTERNOON 21 September 2012 Concludes General Debate on Human Rights Bodies and Mechanisms and on the Universal Periodic Review The Human Rights Council this afternoon held a panel discussion on Nelson Mandela International Day after UPRhttps://www.ohchr.org//en/press-releases/2012/09/human-rights-council-holds-panel-discussion-nelson-mandela-international-day