Search
Data source
EU member states
Other countries
Keywords
Tags
Displaying 841 - 849 of 849
X. and Y. v. Canada
X. and Y. v. Canada CCPR/C/118/D/2771/2016 Communication number s : 2771/2016 Author: X. and Y. Type of decision: Admissibility decision Session No 118 Country Canada Submission date 22 Mar 2016 Date of decision 03 Nov 2016 Comment: This document has no JUTBCCPR/C/118/D/2771/2016https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2130/en-US
X. v. Austria
X. v. Austria CEDAW/C/64/D/67/2014 Communication number s : 067/2014 Author: X. Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 64 Country Austria Submission date 15 Nov 2013 Date of decision 11 Jul 2016 Comment: This document has no comment: JUTBCEDAW/C/64/D/67/2014https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2108/en-US
X v. Netherlands
X v. Netherlands CAT/C/68/D/863/2018 Communication number s : 863/2018 Author: X represented by counsel Igna Oomen Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 68 Country Netherlands Submission date 12 Jan 2018 Date of decision 05 Dec 2019 Comment: JUTBCAT/C/68/D/863/2018https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2700/en-US
Y.H.A. v. Australia
Y.H.A. v. Australia CAT/C/27/D/162/2000 Communication number s : 162/2000 Author: Y.H.A. Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 27 Country Australia Submission date 14 Apr 2000 Date of decision 23 Nov 2001 Comment: This document has no comment: JUTBCAT/C/27/D/162/2000https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/195/en-US
Z.S. and A.S. v. Switzerland
Z.S. and A.S. v. Switzerland CRC/C/89/D/74/2019 Communication number s : 74/2019 Author: Z.S. and A.S. Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 89 Country Switzerland Submission date 20 Sep 2018 Date of decision 10 Feb 2022 Comment: This document JUTBCRC/C/89/D/74/2019https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/3001/en-US
Z.U.B.S. v. Australia
Z.U.B.S. v. Australia CERD/C/55/D/6/1995 Communication number s : 6/1995 Author: Z.U.B.S. Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 55 Country Australia Submission date 17 Jan 1995 Date of decision 26 Dec 1999 Comment: This document has no comment: JUTBCERD/C/55/D/6/1995https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/3024/en-US
fourth EVALUATION round Corruption prevention in respect of members of parliament, judges and prosecutors SECOND COMPLIANCE REPORT LUXEMBOURG
fourth EVALUATION round Corruption prevention in respect of members of parliament judges and prosecutors SECOND COMPLIANCE REPORT LUXEMBOURG LUX 2017 10 18 2017 10 20 I. INTRODUCTION The Second Compliance Report assesses the measures taken by the GRECOGrecoRC4-2017-17-Final-eng-Luxembourg-2ndRC-PUBLIChttps://hudoc.greco.coe.int/eng?i=GrecoRC4-2017-17-Final-eng-Luxembourg-2ndRC-PUBLIC
van der Plaat v. New Zealand
van der Plaat v. New Zealand CCPR/C/93/D/1492/2006 Communication number s : 1492/2006 Author: Ronald van der Plaat Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 93 Country New Zealand Submission date 07 Apr 2006 Date of decision 22 Jul 2008 JUTBCCPR/C/93/D/1492/2006https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1376/en-US
Özçelik et al. v. Türkiye
z elik et al. v. T rkiye CCPR/C/125/D/2980/2017 Communication number s : 2980/2017 Author: smet z elik Turgay Karaman and I.A. Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 125 Country T rkiye Submission date 12 May 2017 Date of decision 26 Mar 2019 JUTBCCPR/C/125/D/2980/2017https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2918/en-US