Search
Data source
EU member states
Other countries
Keywords
Tags
Displaying 721 - 734 of 734
Working Group on discrimination against women and girls
Report to HRC A/HRC/35/29/Add.1 from 17 May 2016 to 27 May 2017 27 April 2017 Working Group on discrimination against women and girls Hungary United Nations A/HRC/35/29/Add.1 General Assembly Distr.: General 21 April 2017 Original: English Human Rights UNSPA/HRC/35/29/Add.1https://spinternet.ohchr.org/Download.aspx?SymbolNo=A%2fHRC%2f35%2f29%2fAdd.1&Lang=en
Working Group on the issue of human rights and transnational corporations and other business enterprises
Report to HRC A/HRC/26/25/Add.4 from 22 April 2013 to 1 May 2013 6 May 2014 Working Group on the issue of human rights and transnational corporations and other business enterprises United States of America United Nations A/HRC/26/25/Add.4 General Assembly UNSPA/HRC/26/25/Add.4https://spinternet.ohchr.org/Download.aspx?SymbolNo=A%2fHRC%2f26%2f25%2fAdd.4&Lang=en
Working Group on the use of mercenaries as a means of violating human rights and impeding the exercise of the right of peoples to self-determination
Report to HRC A/HRC/15/25/Add.2 from 4 April 2009 to 9 April 2009 14 June 2010 Working Group on the use of mercenaries as a means of violating human rights and impeding the exercise of the right of peoples to self determination Afghanistan United Nations UNSPA/HRC/15/25/Add.2https://spinternet.ohchr.org/Download.aspx?SymbolNo=A%2fHRC%2f15%2f25%2fAdd.2&Lang=en
X.Y. v. Switzerland
X.Y. v. Switzerland CAT/C/26/D/128/1999 Communication number s : 128/1999 Author: X.Y. Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 26 Country Switzerland Submission date 02 Mar 1999 Date of decision 15 May 2001 Comment: This document has no comment: JUTBCAT/C/26/D/128/1999https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/196/en-US
X. and Y. v. Canada
X. and Y. v. Canada CCPR/C/118/D/2771/2016 Communication number s : 2771/2016 Author: X. and Y. Type of decision: Admissibility decision Session No 118 Country Canada Submission date 22 Mar 2016 Date of decision 03 Nov 2016 Comment: This document has no JUTBCCPR/C/118/D/2771/2016https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2130/en-US
X. v. Austria
X. v. Austria CEDAW/C/64/D/67/2014 Communication number s : 067/2014 Author: X. Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 64 Country Austria Submission date 15 Nov 2013 Date of decision 11 Jul 2016 Comment: This document has no comment: JUTBCEDAW/C/64/D/67/2014https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2108/en-US
X v. Netherlands
X v. Netherlands CAT/C/68/D/863/2018 Communication number s : 863/2018 Author: X represented by counsel Igna Oomen Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 68 Country Netherlands Submission date 12 Jan 2018 Date of decision 05 Dec 2019 Comment: JUTBCAT/C/68/D/863/2018https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2700/en-US
Y.H.A. v. Australia
Y.H.A. v. Australia CAT/C/27/D/162/2000 Communication number s : 162/2000 Author: Y.H.A. Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 27 Country Australia Submission date 14 Apr 2000 Date of decision 23 Nov 2001 Comment: This document has no comment: JUTBCAT/C/27/D/162/2000https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/195/en-US
Z.S. and A.S. v. Switzerland
Z.S. and A.S. v. Switzerland CRC/C/89/D/74/2019 Communication number s : 74/2019 Author: Z.S. and A.S. Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 89 Country Switzerland Submission date 20 Sep 2018 Date of decision 10 Feb 2022 Comment: This document JUTBCRC/C/89/D/74/2019https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/3001/en-US
Z.U.B.S. v. Australia
Z.U.B.S. v. Australia CERD/C/55/D/6/1995 Communication number s : 6/1995 Author: Z.U.B.S. Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 55 Country Australia Submission date 17 Jan 1995 Date of decision 26 Dec 1999 Comment: This document has no comment: JUTBCERD/C/55/D/6/1995https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/3024/en-US
ZALYAN AND OTHERS v. Armenia
ZALYAN AND OTHERS v. Armenia ARM 17/06/2016 00:00:00 30/01/2018 14:23:52 Case Description: The case concerns the ineffectiveness of the investigations carried out into complaints by three former Armenian servicemen that they had been tortured and ill EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-377
decision on the merits: Unione Nazionale Dirigenti dello Stato (UNADIS) v. Italy, Complaint No. 147/2017
decision on the merits: Unione Nazionale Dirigenti dello Stato UNADIS v. Italy Complaint No. 147/2017 ITA 01 01 000 01 02 000 01 04 000 04 01 000 04 04 000 05 00 000 06 04 000 24 00 163 91 00 163 2021 06 30 2021 11 10 European Committee of Social Rights ESCcc-147-2017-dmerits-enhttps://hudoc.esc.coe.int/eng?i=cc-147-2017-dmerits-en
van der Plaat v. New Zealand
van der Plaat v. New Zealand CCPR/C/93/D/1492/2006 Communication number s : 1492/2006 Author: Ronald van der Plaat Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 93 Country New Zealand Submission date 07 Apr 2006 Date of decision 22 Jul 2008 JUTBCCPR/C/93/D/1492/2006https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1376/en-US
Özçelik et al. v. Türkiye
z elik et al. v. T rkiye CCPR/C/125/D/2980/2017 Communication number s : 2980/2017 Author: smet z elik Turgay Karaman and I.A. Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 125 Country T rkiye Submission date 12 May 2017 Date of decision 26 Mar 2019 JUTBCCPR/C/125/D/2980/2017https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2918/en-US