Search
Data source
EU member states
Other countries
Keywords
Tags
Displaying 1 - 20 of 202
A/HRC/47/12: Report of the Working Group on the Universal Periodic Review - Austria
United Nations A/HRC/47/12 General Assembly Distr.: General 9 April 2021 Original: English Human Rights Council Forty seventh session 21 June 9 July 2021 Agenda item 6 Universal periodic review Report of the Working Group on the Universal Periodic Review UPRA/HRC/47/12https://www.ohchr.org//en/documents/country-reports/ahrc4712-report-working-group-universal-periodic-review-austria
B.K. v. Switzerland
B.K. v. Switzerland CAT/C/67/D/828/2017 Communication number s : 828/2017 Author: B.K. represented by counsel Ange Sankieme Lusanga Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 67 Country Switzerland Submission date 05 Jun 2017 Date of decision JUTBCAT/C/67/D/828/2017https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2679/en-US
C.F.T. v. Switzerland
C.F.T. v. Switzerland CAT/C/66/D/829/2017 Communication number s : 829/2017 Author: C.F.T. represented by counsel Coordination Asyle Migration Riviera Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 66 Country Switzerland Submission date 05 Jun 2017 Date JUTBCAT/C/66/D/829/2017https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2588/en-US
CASE OF AL-DULIMI AND MONTANA MANAGEMENT INC. v. SWITZERLAND
CASE OF AL DULIMI AND MONTANA MANAGEMENT INC. v. SWITZERLAND 5809/08 MICHEL J. C. CHE 11/26/2013 12:00:00 AM Preliminary objection dismissed Article 35 3 Ratione personae Preliminary objection dismissed Article 35 3 Ratione materiae Remainder inadmissible ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2013:1126JUD000580908https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-138948
CASE OF AL-DULIMI AND MONTANA MANAGEMENT INC. v. SWITZERLAND
CASE OF AL DULIMI AND MONTANA MANAGEMENT INC. v. SWITZERLAND 5809/08 MICHEL J. C. OBEIDAT T. FRIES S. CHE 6/21/2016 12:00:00 AM Preliminary objection dismissed Art. 35 Admissibility criteria Art. 35 3 a Ratione personae Preliminary objection dismissed ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2016:0621JUD000580908https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-164515
CASE OF AL-SAADOON AND MUFDHI v. THE UNITED KINGDOM
CASE OF AL SAADOON AND MUFDHI v. THE UNITED KINGDOM 61498/08 SHINER P. GBR 3/2/2010 12:00:00 AM Violation of Art. 3 substantive aspect No violation of Art. 6 Violation of Art. 13 Violation of Art. 34 Non pecuniary damage finding of violation sufficient 26 ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2010:0302JUD006149808https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-97575
CASE OF BOSPHORUS HAVA YOLLARI TURİZM VE TİCARET ANONİM ŞİRKETİ v. IRELAND
CASE OF BOSPHORUS HAVA YOLLARI TUR ZM VE T CARET ANON M RKET v. IRELAND 45036/98 DOYLE J. IRL 6/30/2005 12:00:00 AM Preliminary objections rejected out of time non exhaustion of domestic remedies No violation of P1 1 Constitution Article 29 European ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2005:0630JUD004503698https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-69564
CASE OF MAMATKULOV AND ABDURASULOVIC v. TURKEY
CASE OF MAMATKULOV AND ABDURASULOVIC v. TURKEY 46827/99 46951/99 N/A TUR 2/6/2003 12:00:00 AM No violation of Art. 3 No violation of Art. 6 as regard the extradition proceedings No separate issue under Art. 6 as regard the other complaints Violation of ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2003:0206JUD004682799https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-60924
CASE OF MAMATKULOV AND ASKAROV v. TURKEY
CASE OF MAMATKULOV AND ASKAROV v. TURKEY 46827/99 46951/99 CARSANCAKLI I.S. TUR 2/4/2005 12:00:00 AM No violation of Art. 3 Not necessary to examine Art. 2 Inadmissible under Art. 6 concerning the exradition proceedings No violation of Art. 6 1 Failure to ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2005:0204JUD004682799https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-68183
CASE OF NADA v. SWITZERLAND
CASE OF NADA v. SWITZERLAND 10593/08 MCBRIDE J. CHE 9/12/2012 12:00:00 AM Preliminary objections dismissed Article 35 3 Ratione personae Preliminary objections dismissed Article 34 Victim Preliminary objection joined to merits and dismissed Article 35 3 ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2012:0912JUD001059308https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-113118
CASE OF OTHMAN (ABU QATADA) v. THE UNITED KINGDOM
CASE OF OTHMAN ABU QATADA v. THE UNITED KINGDOM 8139/09 PEIRCE G. FITZGERALD E. QC HUSAIN R. QC FRIEDMAN D. GBR 1/17/2012 12:00:00 AM No violation of Article 3 Prohibition of torture Article 3 Expulsion Conditional Jordan No violation of Article 3 13 ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2012:0117JUD000813909https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-108629
CASE OF PERİNÇEK v. SWITZERLAND
CASE OF PER N EK v. SWITZERLAND 27510/08 CENGIZ M. CHE 10/15/2015 12:00:00 AM Violation of Article 10 Freedom of expression General Article 10 1 Freedom of expression Pecuniary damage claim dismissed Article 41 Pecuniary damage Just satisfaction Non ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2015:1015JUD002751008https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-158235
CASE OF RAMADAN v. MALTA
CASE OF RAMADAN v. MALTA 76136/12 REFALO I. GRECH S. MLT 6/21/2016 12:00:00 AM Remainder inadmissible No violation of Article 8 Right to respect for private and family life Article 8 1 Respect for private life Articles 14 previously Article 9 27 1 27 2 ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2016:0621JUD007613612https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-163820
Convention on the Recognition of Qualifications concerning Higher Education in the European Region (ETS No. 165)
Convention on the Recognition of Qualifications concerning Higher Education in the European Region ETS No. 165 165 Lisbon 1997 04 11T00:00:00 Special conditions of opening for signature Lisbon 1999 02 01T00:00:00 5 Ratifications including 3 member States COEETS No. 165https://rm.coe.int/168007f2c7
D.S. v. Australia
D.S. v. Australia CAT/C/73/D/941/2019 Communication number s : 941/2019 Author: D.S. Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 73 Country Australia Submission date 12 Jul 2019 Date of decision 22 Apr 2022 Comment: This document has no comment: JUTBCAT/C/73/D/941/2019https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/3137/en-US
Human Rights Council adopts outcome of Universal Periodic Review on Nauru, Rwanda and Nepal
Human Rights Council MORNING 7 June 2011 The Human Rights Council this morning adopted the outcome of the Universal Periodic Review on Nauru Rwanda and Nepal. Marlene Moses Permanent Representative of Nauru to the United Nations in New York said the UPRhttps://www.ohchr.org//en/press-releases/2011/06/human-rights-council-adopts-outcome-universal-periodic-review-nauru-rwanda
Independent Expert on the situation of human rights in Haiti
Report to HRC E/CN.4/2001/106 from 25 September 2000 to 29 September 2000 30 January 2001 Independent Expert on the situation of human rights in Haiti Haiti E UNITED NATIONS Economic and Social Distr. Council GENERAL E/CN.4/2001/106 30 January 2001 UNSPE/CN.4/2001/106https://spinternet.ohchr.org/Download.aspx?SymbolNo=E%2fCN.4%2f2001%2f106&Lang=en
L.M. v. Canada
L.M. v. Canada CAT/C/63/D/488/2012 Communication number s : 488/2012 Author: L.M. represented by counsel Johanne Doyon and Philippe Larochelle Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 63 Country Canada Submission date 10 Jan 2012 Date of decision JUTBCAT/C/63/D/488/2012https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2735/en-US
M.K.M. v. Australia
M.K.M. v. Australia CAT/C/60/D/681/2015 Communication number s : 681/2015 Author: M.K.M. represented by counsel Michaela Byers Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 60 Country Australia Submission date 18 May 2015 Date of decision 10 May 2017 JUTBCAT/C/60/D/681/2015https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2253/en-US
M.M. v. Denmark
M.M. v. Denmark CCPR/C/125/D/2345/2014 Communication number s : 2345/2014 Author: M.M. Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 125 Country Denmark Submission date 07 Feb 2014 Date of decision 14 Mar 2019 Comment: This document has no comment: JUTBCCPR/C/125/D/2345/2014https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2564/en-US