Search
Data source
EU member states
Other countries
Keywords
Tags
Displaying 3061 - 3080 of 3153
Third report on Poland
Third report on Poland POL 2004 12 17 2005 06 14 CRI 2005 25 Council of Europe European Commission against Racism and Intolerance Third report on Poland Adopted on 17 December 2004 Strasbourg 14 June 2005 Table of contents ECRIPOL-CbC-III-2005-025-ENGhttps://hudoc.ecri.coe.int/eng?i=POL-CbC-III-2005-025-ENG
Third report on Romania
Third report on Romania ROU 2005 06 24 2006 02 21 CRI 2006 3 Council of Europe European Commission against Racism and Intolerance Third report on Romania Adopted on 24 June 2005 Strasbourg 21 February 2006 Table of contents Foreword Executive summary I. ECRIROU-CbC-III-2006-003-ENGhttps://hudoc.ecri.coe.int/eng?i=ROU-CbC-III-2006-003-ENG
Third report on Switzerland
Third report on Switzerland CHE 2003 06 27 2004 01 27 CRI 2004 5 Third report on Switzerland Adopted on 27 June 2003 Strasbourg 27 January 2004 For further information about the work of the European Commission against Racism and Intolerance ECRI and about ECRICHE-CbC-III-2004-005-ENGhttps://hudoc.ecri.coe.int/eng?i=CHE-CbC-III-2004-005-ENG
Third report on Turkey
Third report on Turkey TUR 2004 06 25 2005 02 15 CRI 2005 5 Third report on Turkey Adopted on 25 June 2004 Strasbourg 15 February 2005 For further information about the work of the European Commission against Racism and Intolerance ECRI and about the ECRITUR-CbC-III-2005-005-ENGhttps://hudoc.ecri.coe.int/eng?i=TUR-CbC-III-2005-005-ENG
Third report on the Czech Republic
Third report on the Czech Republic CZE 2003 12 05 2004 06 08 CRI 2004 22 Council of Europe European Commission against Racism and Intolerance Third report on the Czech Republic Adopted on 5 December 2003 Strasbourg 8 June 2004 Table of contents ECRICZE-CbC-III-2004-022-ENGhttps://hudoc.ecri.coe.int/eng?i=CZE-CbC-III-2004-022-ENG
Tiina Sanila-Aikio v. Finland
Tiina Sanila Aikio v. Finland CCPR/C/119/D/2668/2015 Communication number s : 2668/2015 Author: Tiina Sanila Aikio Type of decision: Admissibility decision Session No 119 Country Finland Submission date 02 Oct 2015 Date of decision 28 Mar 2017 Comment: JUTBCCPR/C/119/D/2668/2015https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2435/en-US
Tiina Sanila-Aikio v. Finland
Tiina Sanila Aikio v. Finland CCPR/C/124/D/2668/2015 Communication number s : 2668/2015 Author: Tiina Sanila Aikio Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 124 Country Finland Submission date 02 Oct 2015 Date of decision 01 Nov 2018 Comment: Note: JUTBCCPR/C/124/D/2668/2015https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2563/en-US
U.A. v. Canada
U.A. v. Canada CAT/C/63/D/767/2016 Communication number s : 767/2016 Author: U.A. represented by counsel Rajwinder S. Bhambi Type of decision: Admissibility decision Session No 63 Country Canada Submission date 16 Aug 2016 Date of decision 17 May 2018 JUTBCAT/C/63/D/767/2016https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2744/en-US
U.M.H. v. Sweden
U.M.H. v. Sweden CCPR/C/129/D/2742/2016 Communication number s : 2742/2016 Author: U.M.H. Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 129 Country Sweden Submission date 26 Feb 2016 Date of decision 23 Jul 2020 Comment: This document has no JUTBCCPR/C/129/D/2742/2016https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2845/en-US
UNITED ARAB EMIRATES: CONCLUDING OBSERVATIONS
UNITED ARAB EMIRATES: CONCLUDING OBSERVATIONS CAT/C/ARE/CO/1 NULL 2022 08 22T00:00:00 CAT United Nations CAT/C/ARE/CO/1 Convention against Torture Distr.: General 22 August 2022 and Other Cruel Inhuman or Degrading Treatment Original: English or UHRICAT/C/ARE/CO/1https://uhri.ohchr.org/en/document/2b397244-fa18-4420-b2c5-3ff1da9a033a
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA: CONCLUDING OBSERVATIONS
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA: CONCLUDING OBSERVATIONS CERD/C/USA/CO/10 12 NULL 2022 09 21T00:00:00 CERD United Nations CERD/C/USA/CO/10 12 International Convention on Distr.: General 21 September 2022 the Elimination of All Forms Original: English of Racial UHRICERD/C/USA/CO/10-12https://uhri.ohchr.org/en/document/133396dd-9f5b-43ae-8926-28144f817762
UNIVERSAL PERIODIC REVIEW REPORT OF THE WORKING GROUP ON THE UNIVERSAL PERIODIC REVIEW: NEW ZEALAND
UNIVERSAL PERIODIC REVIEW REPORT OF THE WORKING GROUP ON THE UNIVERSAL PERIODIC REVIEW: NEW ZEALAND A/HRC/12/8 NULL 2009 06 04T00:00:00 UPR UNITED NATIONS A Distr. GENERAL General Assembly A/HRC/12/8 4 June 2009 Original: ENGLISH HUMAN RIGHTS UHRIA/HRC/12/8https://uhri.ohchr.org/en/document/fc4a0815-877f-433e-ba6d-a3452774baf8
UPR Brazil
UPR Brazil A/HRC/36/11 NULL 2017 07 18T00:00:00 UPR 136.1 Ratify the Optional Protocol to the International Covenant on Economic Social and Cultural Rights Albania Angola Argentina Montenegro Portugal 136.2 Sign and ratify the Optional Protocol to the UHRIA/HRC/36/11https://uhri.ohchr.org/en/document/db3a20f6-bff7-485b-adbf-350f524fee1c
UPR South Africa
UPR South Africa A/HRC/36/16 NULL 2017 07 18T00:00:00 UPR 139.1 Ratify the International Convention on the Protection of the Rights of All Migrant Workers and Members of Their Families Burkina Faso Niger Uganda Philippines Sierra Leone 139.2 Promptly UHRIA/HRC/36/16https://uhri.ohchr.org/en/document/13e64578-4066-4fb1-936e-25b43cad2788
UZBEKISTAN: CONCLUDING OBSERVATIONS
UZBEKISTAN: CONCLUDING OBSERVATIONS E/C.12/UZB/CO/2 NULL 2014 06 12T00:00:00 CESCR United Nations E/C.12/UZB/CO/2 Economic and Social Council Distr.: General 13 June 2014 Original: English Committee on Economic Social and Cultural Rights Concluding UHRIE/C.12/UZB/CO/2https://uhri.ohchr.org/en/document/6d4596e7-da6c-4821-998b-b71a8d6dfc45
Universal Periodic Review - A Practical Guide for Civil Society
This Guide explains the Universal Periodic Review mechanism through which the Human Rights Council reviews on a periodic basis the fulfilment by each of the 193 United Nations Member States of their human rights obligations and commitments. It explains UPRhttps://www.ohchr.org//en/publications/policy-and-methodological-publications/universal-periodic-review-practical-guide-civil
V.A. v. Switzerland
V.A. v. Switzerland CRC/C/85/D/56/2018 Communication number s : 056/2018 Author: V.A. Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 85 Online limited session Country Switzerland Submission date 27 Sep 2018 Date of decision 28 Sep 2020 Comment: This JUTBCRC/C/85/D/56/2018https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2762/en-US
V.M. v. Australia
V.M. v. Australia CAT/C/67/D/723/2015 Communication number s : 723/2015 Author: V.M. represented by counsel John Sweeney Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 67 Country Australia Submission date 30 Dec 2015 Date of decision 02 Aug 2019 Comment: JUTBCAT/C/67/D/723/2015https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2626/en-US
V.S. v. Slovakia
V.S. v. Slovakia CERD/C/88/D/56/2014 Communication number s : 056/2014 Author: V.S. represented by counsel Vanda Durbakova Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 88 Country Slovakia Submission date 30 Apr 2014 Date of decision 04 Dec 2015 JUTBCERD/C/88/D/56/2014https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2091/en-US
VIET NAM: CONCLUDING OBSERVATIONS
VIET NAM: CONCLUDING OBSERVATIONS CAT/C/VNM/CO/1 NULL 2018 12 28T00:00:00 CAT United Nations CAT/C/VNM/CO/1 Convention against Torture Distr.: General 28 December 2018 and Other Cruel Inhuman or Degrading Treatment Original: English or Punishment UHRICAT/C/VNM/CO/1https://uhri.ohchr.org/en/document/ed43e087-0114-49ca-830f-33783d6c24a9