Search
Data source
EU member states
Other countries
Keywords
Tags
Displaying 1 - 20 of 28
Bagale v. Nepal
Bagale v. Nepal CCPR/C/130/D/2777/2016 Communication number s : 2777/2016 Author: Hom Bahadur Bagale Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 130 Country Nepal Submission date 17 Dec 2015 Date of decision 02 Nov 2020 Comment: This document has no JUTBCCPR/C/130/D/2777/2016https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/3277/en-US
CASE OF AGGERHOLM v. DENMARK
CASE OF AGGERHOLM v. DENMARK 45439/18 JENSEN T. DNK 9/15/2020 12:00:00 AM Violation of Article 3 Prohibition of torture Article 3 Degrading treatment Inhuman treatment Non pecuniary damage award Article 41 Non pecuniary damage Just satisfaction 350 90 193 ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2020:0915JUD004543918https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-204602
CASE OF AL-KHAWAJA AND TAHERY v. THE UNITED KINGDOM
CASE OF AL KHAWAJA AND TAHERY v. THE UNITED KINGDOM 26766/05 22228/06 BURCOMBE A. WELLS D. BENNATHAN J. FISHER M. TROWLER R. GBR 12/15/2011 12:00:00 AM No violation of Art. 6 1 6 3 d Violation of Art. 6 1 6 3 d Non pecuniary damage award Criminal justice ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2011:1215JUD002676605https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-108072
CASE OF BIG BROTHER WATCH AND OTHERS v. THE UNITED KINGDOM
CASE OF BIG BROTHER WATCH AND OTHERS v. THE UNITED KINGDOM 58170/13 62322/14 24960/15 CAREY D. CURLING R. NORTON E. GBR 9/13/2018 12:00:00 AM Remainder inadmissible Art. 35 Admissibility criteria Art. 35 3 a Manifestly ill founded Violation of Article 8 ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2018:0913JUD005817013https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-186048
CASE OF BIG BROTHER WATCH AND OTHERS v. THE UNITED KINGDOM
CASE OF BIG BROTHER WATCH AND OTHERS v. THE UNITED KINGDOM 58170/13 62322/14 24960/15 CAREY D. CURLING R. NORTON E. GBR 5/25/2021 12:00:00 AM Preliminary objection dismissed Art. 34 Individual applications Art. 34 Victim Violation of Article 8 Right to ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2021:0525JUD005817013https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-210077
CASE OF ÖCALAN v. TURKEY
CASE OF CALAN v. TURKEY 46221/99 KENTRIDGE Sir Sydney MULLER Mark OTTY Timothy TUGLUK Aysel TUR 5/12/2005 12:00:00 AM Preliminary objection dismissed Article 35 1 Exhaustion of domestic remedies Violation of Article 5 Right to liberty and security Article ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2005:0512JUD004622199https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-69022
CASE OF ÖCALAN v. TURKEY
CASE OF CALAN v. TURKEY 46221/99 N/A TUR 3/12/2003 12:00:00 AM Preliminary objection dismissed Article 35 1 Exhaustion of domestic remedies Violation of Article 5 Right to liberty and security Article 5 4 Review of lawfulness of detention Violation of ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2003:0312JUD004622199https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-60979
CASE OF ILIAS AND AHMED v. HUNGARY
CASE OF ILIAS AND AHMED v. HUNGARY 47287/15 POH RNOK B. HUN 11/21/2019 12:00:00 AM Preliminary objection allowed Art. 35 Admissibility criteria Art. 35 1 Six month period Remainder inadmissible Art. 35 Admissibility criteria Art. 35 3 a Ratione materiae ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2019:1121JUD004728715https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-198760
CASE OF McGINLEY AND EGAN v. THE UNITED KINGDOM
CASE OF McGINLEY AND EGAN v. THE UNITED KINGDOM 21825/93 23414/94 N/A GBR 6/9/1998 12:00:00 AM Preliminary objection allowed non exhaustion of domestic remedies No violation of Art. 6 1 No violation of Art. 8 Not necessary to examine Art. 13 445 7 310 451 ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:1998:0609JUD002182593https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-58175
CASE OF THE SUNDAY TIMES v. THE UNITED KINGDOM (No. 1)
CASE OF THE SUNDAY TIMES v. THE UNITED KINGDOM No. 1 6538/74 N/A GBR 4/26/1979 12:00:00 AM Violation of Art. 10 No violation of Art. 14 10 Not necessary to examine Art. 18 Just satisfaction reserved 149 148 201 316 265 379 343 100 232 ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:1979:0426JUD000653874https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-57584
Cayzer v. Australia
Cayzer v. Australia CCPR/C/135/D/2981/2017 Communication number s : 2981/2017 Author: Graham Cayzer Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 135 Country Australia Submission date 13 Jul 2016 Date of decision 25 Jul 2022 Comment: This document has JUTBCCPR/C/135/D/2981/2017https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/3676/en-US
F.O.F. v. Brazil
F.O.F. v. Brazil CRPD/C/23/D/40/2017 Communication number s : 40/2017 Author: F.O.F. Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 23 Country Brazil Submission date 21 Dec 2016 Date of decision 02 Sep 2020 Comment: This document has no comment: JUTBCRPD/C/23/D/40/2017https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/3071/en-US
Follow-up report v. Australia,Bosnia and Herzegovina,Morocco,New Zealand,Russian Federation,Spain,Sweden,Switzerland
Follow up report v. Australia Bosnia and Herzegovina Morocco New Zealand Russian Federation Spain Sweden Switzerland CAT/C/71/2 Communication number s : 637/2014 817/2017 852/2017 882/2018 854/2017 818/2017 729/2016 681/2015 Author: Type of decision: JUTBCAT/C/71/2https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/3588/en-US
Grainne Sherlock v. Australia
Grainne Sherlock v. Australia CRPD/C/24/D/20/2014 Communication number s : 20/2014 Author: Grainne Sherlock Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 24 Country Australia Submission date 24 Feb 2014 Date of decision 19 Mar 2021 Comment: This JUTBCRPD/C/24/D/20/2014https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/3069/en-US
P.S.B. and T.K. v. Canada
P.S.B. and T.K. v. Canada CAT/C/55/D/505/2012 Communication number s : 505/2012 Author: P.S.B. and T.K. Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 55 Country Canada Submission date 08 Mar 2012 Date of decision 13 Aug 2015 Comment: This document has JUTBCAT/C/55/D/505/2012https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1968/en-US
Paul Zentveld v. New Zealand
Paul Zentveld v. New Zealand CAT/C/68/D/852/2017 Communication number s : 852/2017 Author: Paul Zentveld represented by counsel Victor Boyd from the Citizens Commission on Human Rights New Zealand Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 68 Country JUTBCAT/C/68/D/852/2017https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2697/en-US
Pillai et al. v. Canada
Pillai et al. v. Canada CCPR/C/101/D/1763/2008 Communication number s : 1763/2008 Author: Ernest Sigman Pillai and Laeticia Swenthi Joachimpillai Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 101 Country Canada Submission date 29 Feb 2008 Date of JUTBCCPR/C/101/D/1763/2008https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1631/en-US
Postnov v. Belarus
Postnov v. Belarus CCPR/C/132/D/2361/2014 Communication number s : 2361/2014 Author: Igor Postnov Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 132 Country Belarus Submission date 22 Feb 2014 Date of decision 19 Jul 2021 Comment: This document has no JUTBCCPR/C/132/D/2361/2014https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/3108/en-US
REPORT OF THE SPECIAL RAPPORTEUR ON THE RIGHT TO FOOD, JEAN ZIEGLER : ADDENDUM: MISSION TO CUBA
REPORT OF THE SPECIAL RAPPORTEUR ON THE RIGHT TO FOOD JEAN ZIEGLER : ADDENDUM: MISSION TO CUBA A/HRC/7/5/Add.3 NULL 2008 03 03T06:00:00 SR Food UNITED NATIONS A Distr. GENERAL General Assembly A/HRC/7/5/Add.3 3 March 2008 Original: ENGLISH HUMAN RIGHTS UHRIA/HRC/7/5/Add.3https://uhri.ohchr.org/en/document/ea86ae5c-b13b-4d72-a16a-185fab85adc1
Report of the Working Group on the Universal Periodic Review - Guatemala
United Nations A/HRC/37/9 General Assembly Distr.: General 2 January 2018 Original: English Human Rights Council Thirty seventh session 26 February 23 March 2018 Agenda item 6 Universal periodic review Report of the Working Group on the Universal Periodic UPRA/HRC/37/9https://www.ohchr.org//en/documents/reports/report-working-group-universal-periodic-review-guatemala