Search
Data source
EU member states
Other countries
Keywords
Tags
Displaying 81 - 100 of 6618
Additional Protocol to the Convention on Human Rights and Biomedicine concerning Genetic Testing for Health Purposes (CETS No. 203)
Additional Protocol to the Convention on Human Rights and Biomedicine concerning Genetic Testing for Health Purposes CETS No. 203 203 Strasbourg 2008 11 27T00:00:00 Treaty open for signature by the Signatories to Treaty ETS 164 Strasbourg 2018 07 COECETS No. 203https://rm.coe.int/1680084824
Aden et al. v. Denmark
Aden et al. v. Denmark CCPR/C/126/D/2531/2015 Communication number s : 2531/2015 Author: Nimo Mohamed Aden and Liban Muhammed Hassan Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 126 Country Denmark Submission date 15 Sep 2014 Date of decision 25 Jul JUTBCCPR/C/126/D/2531/2015https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2791/en-US
Aheyeu v. Belarus
Aheyeu v. Belarus CCPR/C/132/D/2862/2016 Communication number s : 2862/2016 Author: Aleh Aheyeu Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 132 Country Belarus Submission date 19 Aug 2016 Date of decision 15 Jul 2021 Comment: Individual opinion of JUTBCCPR/C/132/D/2862/2016https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/3188/en-US
Ahmed Souaiene et al. v. Algeria
Ahmed Souaiene et al. v. Algeria CCPR/C/128/D/3082/2017 Communication number s : 3082/2017 Author: Ahmed Souaiene and A cha Souaiene Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 128 Country Algeria Submission date 08 Sep 2017 Date of decision 27 Mar JUTBCCPR/C/128/D/3082/2017https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2873/en-US
Al-Rabassi v. Libya
Al Rabassi v. Libya CCPR/C/111/D/1860/2009 Communication number s : 1860/2009 Author: Mufteh Younis Muftah Al Rabassi represented by human rights organization Alkarama Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 111 Country Libya Submission date 16 JUTBCCPR/C/111/D/1860/2009https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1840/en-US
Alakuş v. Türkiye
Alaku v. T rkiye CCPR/C/135/D/3736/2020 Communication number s : 3736/2020 Author: Mukadder Alaku Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 135 Country T rkiye Submission date 23 Dec 2019 Date of decision 26 Jul 2022 Comment: This document has no JUTBCCPR/C/135/D/3736/2020https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/3737/en-US
Aleksandr Komarovsky v. Belarus
Aleksandr Komarovsky v. Belarus CCPR/C/109/D/1839/2008 Communication number s : 1839/2008 Author: Aleksandr Komarovksy Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 109 Country Belarus Submission date 07 Aug 2008 Date of decision 25 Oct 2013 Comment: JUTBCCPR/C/109/D/1839/2008https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1793/en-US
Alekseev v. Russian Federation
Alekseev v. Russian Federation CCPR/C/109/D/1873/2009 Communication number s : 1873/2009 Author: Nikolai Alekseev Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 109 Country Russian Federation Submission date 25 Mar 2009 Date of decision 25 Oct 2013 JUTBCCPR/C/109/D/1873/2009https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1686/en-US
Ali v. Tunisia
Ali v. Tunisia CAT/C/41/D/291/2006 Communication number s : 291/2006 Author: Saadia Ali Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 41 Country Tunisia Submission date 02 Mar 2006 Date of decision 21 Nov 2008 Comment: This document has no comment: JUTBCAT/C/41/D/291/2006https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/71/en-US
Alonzo et al. v. Philippines
Alonzo et al. v. Philippines CEDAW/C/84/D/155/2020 Communication number s : 155/2020 Author: Natalia M. Alonzo Perla B. Balingit Virginia M. Bangit Francia A. Buco Dela Paz B. Culala Belen Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 84 Country JUTBCEDAW/C/84/D/155/2020https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/3765/en-US
Alzery v. Sweden
Alzery v. Sweden CCPR/C/88/D/1416/2005 Communication number s : 1416/2005 Author: Mohammed Alzery Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 88 Country Sweden Submission date 29 Jul 2005 Date of decision 25 Oct 2006 Comment: Pursuant to rule 90 of JUTBCCPR/C/88/D/1416/2005https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1300/en-US
Amanda Jane Mellet v. Ireland
Amanda Jane Mellet v. Ireland CCPR/C/116/D/2324/2013 Communication number s : 2324/2013 Author: Amanda Jane Mellet Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 116 Country Ireland Submission date 11 Nov 2013 Date of decision 31 Mar 2016 Comment: This JUTBCCPR/C/116/D/2324/2013https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2152/en-US
Andersen v. Denmark
Andersen v. Denmark CCPR/C/99/D/1868/2009 Communication number s : 1868/2009 Author: Fatima Andersen Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 99 Country Denmark Submission date 13 Jan 2009 Date of decision 26 Jul 2010 Comment: This document JUTBCCPR/C/99/D/1868/2009https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1586/en-US
Arab Millis v. Algeria
Arab Millis v. Algeria CCPR/C/122/D/2398/2014 Communication number s : 2398/2014 Author: Arab Millis Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 122 Country Algeria Submission date 10 Mar 2014 Date of decision 06 Apr 2018 Comment: This document has no JUTBCCPR/C/122/D/2398/2014https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2486/en-US
Aref Mohammed Abdulkarim v. Switzerland
Aref Mohammed Abdulkarim v. Switzerland CAT/C/62/D/710/2015 Communication number s : 710/2015 Author: Aref Mohammed Abdulkarim represented by counsel Mr. Tarig Hassan Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 62 Country Switzerland Submission date JUTBCAT/C/62/D/710/2015https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2405/en-US
Arkauz Arana v. France
Arkauz Arana v. France CAT/C/23/D/63/1997 Communication number s : 063/1997 Author: Josu Arkauz Arana Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 23 Country France Submission date 16 Dec 1996 Date of decision 09 Nov 1999 Comment: This document has no JUTBCAT/C/23/D/63/1997https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/211/en-US
Ashim Rakishev and Dmitry Rakishev v. Kazakhstan
Ashim Rakishev and Dmitry Rakishev v. Kazakhstan CAT/C/61/D/661/2015 Communication number s : 661/2015 Author: Ashim Rakishev father and Dmitry Rakishev son represented by counsel Anara Ibraeva Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 61 Country JUTBCAT/C/61/D/661/2015https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2276/en-US
Austria: Anti-Racism commission praises initiatives to promote integration and counter discrimination, but challenges remain
Austria: Anti Racism commission praises initiatives to promote integration and counter discrimination but challenges remain AUT 2020 06 02 Sixth report on Austria en fr deu Austria: Anti Racism commission praises initiatives to promote integration and ECRIAUT-PR-VI-2020-318-ENGhttps://hudoc.ecri.coe.int/eng?i=AUT-PR-VI-2020-318-ENG
B.A.E.W. and E.M.W. v. Sweden
B.A.E.W. and E.M.W. v. Sweden CCPR/C/129/D/2744/2016 Communication number s : 2744/2016 Author: B.A.E.W. and E.M.W. Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 129 Country Sweden Submission date 26 Feb 2016 Date of decision 23 Jul 2020 Comment: JUTBCCPR/C/129/D/2744/2016https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2847/en-US
B.M.I. and N.A.K. v. Denmark
B.M.I. and N.A.K. v. Denmark CCPR/C/118/D/2569/2015 Communication number s : 2569/2015 Author: B.M.I. and N.A.K. represented by counsel Hannah Krog Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 118 Country Denmark Submission date 06 Feb 2015 Date of JUTBCCPR/C/118/D/2569/2015https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2229/en-US