Search
Data source
EU member states
Other countries
Keywords
Tags
Displaying 1 - 20 of 265
Arslan Dawletow v. Turkmenistan
Arslan Dawletow v. Turkmenistan CCPR/C/125/D/2316/2013 Communication number s : 2316/2013 Author: Arslan Dawletow Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 125 Country Turkmenistan Submission date 01 May 2013 Date of decision 29 Mar 2019 Comment: JUTBCCPR/C/125/D/2316/2013https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/3101/en-US
Atasoy and Sarkut v. Türkiye
Atasoy and Sarkut v. T rkiye CCPR/C/104/D/1853 1854/2008 Communication number s : 1853/2008 1854/2008 Author: Cenk Atasoy and Arda Sarkut Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 104 Country T rkiye Submission date 08 Dec 2008 Date of decision 29 JUTBCCPR/C/104/D/1853-1854/2008https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1627/en-US
CASE OF A. AND OTHERS v. THE UNITED KINGDOM
CASE OF A. AND OTHERS v. THE UNITED KINGDOM 3455/05 BIRNBERG PIERCE AND PARTNERS GBR 2/19/2009 12:00:00 AM No violation of Art. 3 No violation of Art. 13 3 Preliminary objection rejected Government not precluded from raising defence under Art. 5 1 f or ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2009:0219JUD000345505https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-91403
CASE OF A, B AND C v. IRELAND
CASE OF A B AND C v. IRELAND 25579/05 KAY J. IRL 12/16/2010 12:00:00 AM Preliminary objection joined to merits and dismissed non exhaustion of domestic remedies Remainder inadmissible No violation of Art. 8 Violation of Art. 8 Non pecuniary damage award ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2010:1216JUD002557905https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-102332
CASE OF ABDI IBRAHIM v. NORWAY
CASE OF ABDI IBRAHIM v. NORWAY 15379/16 LUTINA A. NOR 12/10/2021 12:00:00 AM Violation of Article 8 Right to respect for private and family life Article 8 1 Respect for family life read in the light of Article 9 Art. 9 Freedom of thought conscience and ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2021:1210JUD001537916https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-214433
CASE OF ABDULLAH YALÇIN v. TURKEY (No. 2)
CASE OF ABDULLAH YAL IN v. TURKEY No. 2 34417/10 ZBEKLI M. TUR 6/14/2022 12:00:00 AM Violation of Article 9 Freedom of thought conscience and religion Article 9 Positive obligations Article 9 1 Manifest religion or belief Section 74 3 of Law no. 5275 of ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2022:0614JUD003441710https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-217716
CASE OF ABU ZUBAYDAH v. LITHUANIA
CASE OF ABU ZUBAYDAH v. LITHUANIA 46454/11 DUFFY H. MICKUM IV G.B. MARGULIES J. LTU 5/31/2018 12:00:00 AM Preliminary objection dismissed Art. 34 Individual applications Art. 34 Victim Preliminary objections joined to merits and dismissed Art. 35 ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2018:0531JUD004645411https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-183687
CASE OF AERTS v. BELGIUM
CASE OF AERTS v. BELGIUM 25357/94 N/A BEL 7/30/1998 12:00:00 AM Preliminary objections rejected victims out of time Violation of Art. 5 1 No violation of Art. 5 4 Violation of Art. 6 1 No violation of Art. 3 Non pecuniary damage financial award Costs and ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:1998:0730JUD002535794https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-58209
CASE OF AL-DULIMI AND MONTANA MANAGEMENT INC. v. SWITZERLAND
CASE OF AL DULIMI AND MONTANA MANAGEMENT INC. v. SWITZERLAND 5809/08 MICHEL J. C. OBEIDAT T. FRIES S. CHE 6/21/2016 12:00:00 AM Preliminary objection dismissed Art. 35 Admissibility criteria Art. 35 3 a Ratione personae Preliminary objection dismissed ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2016:0621JUD000580908https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-164515
CASE OF AL-NASHIF v. BULGARIA
CASE OF AL NASHIF v. BULGARIA 50963/99 N/A BGR 6/20/2002 12:00:00 AM Preliminary objections dismissed non exhaustion of domestic remedies abuse of right of petition Violation of Art. 5 4 Violation of Art. 8 Violation of Art. 13 Not necessary to examine ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2002:0620JUD005096399https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-60522
CASE OF AL NASHIRI v. POLAND
CASE OF AL NASHIRI v. POLAND 28761/11 GOLDSTON J.A. SKILBECK R. SINGH A. HOLLANDER N. POL 7/24/2014 12:00:00 AM Preliminary objection joined to merits and dismissed Art. 35 Admissibility criteria Art. 35 1 Exhaustion of domestic remedies Remainder ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2014:0724JUD002876111https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-146044
CASE OF AL NASHIRI v. ROMANIA
CASE OF AL NASHIRI v. ROMANIA 33234/12 GOLDSTON J.A. SKILBECK R. SINGH A. HOLLANDER N. HATNEANU D.O. ROU 5/31/2018 12:00:00 AM Preliminary objections joined to merits and dismissed Art. 35 Admissibility criteria Art. 35 1 Exhaustion of domestic remedies ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2018:0531JUD003323412https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-183685
CASE OF ARTYOMOV v. RUSSIA
CASE OF ARTYOMOV v. RUSSIA 14146/02 PREOBRAZHENSKAYA O. MIKHAYLOVA O. RUS 5/27/2010 12:00:00 AM Violations of Art. 3 substantive aspect No violation of Art. 3 substantive aspect Violation of Art. 3 procedural aspect Violation of Art. 13 Violation of Art. ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2010:0527JUD001414602https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-98717
CASE OF AUAD v. BULGARIA
CASE OF AUAD v. BULGARIA 46390/10 DASKALOVA D. N. BGR 10/11/2011 12:00:00 AM Violation of Art. 3 in case of expulsion to Lebanon Violation of Art. 13 Violation of Art. 5 1 Remainder inadmissible Non pecuniary damage award Section 44a of the Aliens Act 183 ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2011:1011JUD004639010https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-106668
CASE OF BABIARZ v. POLAND
CASE OF BABIARZ v. POLAND 1955/10 OSAK W. POL 1/10/2017 12:00:00 AM Preliminary objection joined to merits Article 35 3 Ratione materiae No violation of Article 8 Right to respect for private and family life Article 8 Positive obligations Article 8 1 ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2017:0110JUD000195510https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-170344
CASE OF BEARD v. THE UNITED KINGDOM
CASE OF BEARD v. THE UNITED KINGDOM 24882/94 N/A GBR 1/18/2001 12:00:00 AM No violation of Art. 8 No violation of Art. 14 Caravan Sites Act 1968 Ss. 6 10 11 12 16 Criminal Justice and Public Order Act 1994 Ss. 77 78 451 426 429 425 203 268 376 358 238 310 ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2001:0118JUD002488294https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-59155
CASE OF BELLI AND ARQUIER-MARTINEZ v. SWITZERLAND
CASE OF BELLI AND ARQUIER MARTINEZ v. SWITZERLAND 65550/13 SAMBUC H. P. CHE 12/11/2018 12:00:00 AM Remainder inadmissible Art. 35 Admissibility criteria Art. 35 3 a Manifestly ill founded No violation of Article 14 8 Prohibition of discrimination Article ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2018:1211JUD006555013https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-188649
CASE OF CENNET AYHAN AND MEHMET SALIH AYHAN v. TURKEY
CASE OF CENNET AYHAN AND MEHMET SALIH AYHAN v. TURKEY 41964/98 AYHAN MEDENI and ERDOGAN METIN AYHAN TUR 6/27/2006 12:00:00 AM Preliminary objection rejected non exhaustion of domestic remedies No violation of Art. 2 killing Violation of Art. 2 inadequate ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2006:0627JUD004196498https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-76068
CASE OF CHAHAL v. THE UNITED KINGDOM
CASE OF CHAHAL v. THE UNITED KINGDOM 22414/93 N/A GBR 11/15/1996 12:00:00 AM Violation of Art. 3 Violation of Art. 5 4 Violation of Art. 13 No violation of Art. 5 1 Not necessary to examine Art. 8 Non pecuniary damage finding of violation sufficient Costs ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:1996:1115JUD002241493https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-58004
CASE OF CHRISTINE GOODWIN v. THE UNITED KINGDOM
CASE OF CHRISTINE GOODWIN v. THE UNITED KINGDOM 28957/95 N/A GBR 7/11/2002 12:00:00 AM Violation of Art. 8 Violation of Art. 12 No separate issue under Art. 14 No violation of Art. 13 Non pecuniary damage finding of violation sufficient Costs and expenses ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2002:0711JUD002895795https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-60596