Search
Data source
EU member states
Other countries
Keywords
Tags
Displaying 1 - 20 of 120
11. Convention on the Rights of the Child
STATUS AS AT : 14 06 2023 09:15:30 EDT CHAPTER IV HUMAN RIGHTS 11. Convention on the Rights of the Child New York 20 November 1989 Entry into force : 2 September 1990 in accordance with article 49 1 . Registration : 2 September 1990 No. 27531 Status : UNIV-11https://treaties.un.org//Pages/ViewDetails.aspx?src=TREATY&mtdsg_no=IV-11&chapter=4&clang=_en
8. Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Discrimination against Women
STATUS AS AT : 14 06 2023 09:15:30 EDT CHAPTER IV HUMAN RIGHTS 8. Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Discrimination against Women New York 18 December 1979 1 Entry into force : 3 September 1981 in accordance with article 27 1 . Registration : 3 UNIV-8https://treaties.un.org//Pages/ViewDetails.aspx?src=TREATY&mtdsg_no=IV-8&chapter=4&clang=_en
A/HRC/47/7: Report of the Working Group on the Universal Periodic Review - Saint Kitts and Nevis
United Nations A/HRC/47/7 General Assembly Distr.: General 30 March 2021 Original: English Human Rights Council Forty seventh session 21 June 9 July 2021 Agenda item 6 Universal periodic review Report of the Working Group on the Universal Periodic Review UPRA/HRC/47/7https://www.ohchr.org//en/documents/country-reports/ahrc477-report-working-group-universal-periodic-review-saint-kitts-and
A/HRC/47/9: Report of the Working Group on the Universal Periodic Review - Saint Lucia
United Nations A/HRC/47/9 General Assembly Distr.: General 14 April 2021 Original: English Human Rights Council Forty seventh session 21 June 9 July 2021 Agenda item 6 Universal periodic review Report of the Working Group on the Universal Periodic Review UPRA/HRC/47/9https://www.ohchr.org//en/documents/country-reports/ahrc479-report-working-group-universal-periodic-review-saint-lucia
Alzery v. Sweden
Alzery v. Sweden CCPR/C/88/D/1416/2005 Communication number s : 1416/2005 Author: Mohammed Alzery Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 88 Country Sweden Submission date 29 Jul 2005 Date of decision 25 Oct 2006 Comment: Pursuant to rule 90 of JUTBCCPR/C/88/D/1416/2005https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1300/en-US
Anton v. Algeria
Anton v. Algeria CCPR/C/88/D/1424/2005 Communication number s : 1424/2005 Author: Armand Anton Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 88 Country Algeria Submission date 24 Nov 2004 Date of decision 01 Nov 2006 Comment: In accordance with JUTBCCPR/C/88/D/1424/2005https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1324/en-US
B. K. v. Czech Republic
B. K. v. Czech Republic CCPR/C/105/D/1844/2008 Communication number s : 1844/2008 Author: B. K. Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 105 Country Czech Republic Submission date 30 Apr 2008 Date of decision 23 Jul 2012 Comment: Pursuant to JUTBCCPR/C/105/D/1844/2008https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1342/en-US
CASE OF GEORGIA v. RUSSIA (II)
CASE OF GEORGIA v. RUSSIA II 38263/08 RUS 1/21/2021 12:00:00 AM Preliminary objections dismissed Art. 35 Admissibility criteria Art. 35 1 Exhaustion of domestic remedies Remainder inadmissible Art. 35 Admissibility criteria Art. 35 3 a Ratione loci ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2021:0121JUD003826308https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-207757
CASE OF SIC - SOCIEDADE INDEPENDENTE DE COMUNICAÇÃO v. PORTUGAL
CASE OF SIC SOCIEDADE INDEPENDENTE DE COMUNICA O v. PORTUGAL 29856/13 CORREIRA AFONSO R. PRT 7/27/2021 12:00:00 AM Violation of Article 10 Freedom of expression general Article 10 1 Freedom of expression Pecuniary damage claim dismissed Article 41 ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2021:0727JUD002985613https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-211572
CASE OF T. v. THE UNITED KINGDOM
CASE OF T. v. THE UNITED KINGDOM 24724/94 N/A GBR 12/16/1999 12:00:00 AM Preliminary objection dismissed Article 35 1 Exhaustion of domestic remedies No violation of Article 3 Prohibition of torture Article 3 Degrading treatment Inhuman treatment ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:1999:1216JUD002472494https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-58593
CASE OF V. v. THE UNITED KINGDOM
CASE OF V. v. THE UNITED KINGDOM 24888/94 N/A GBR 12/16/1999 12:00:00 AM Preliminary objection dismissed Article 35 1 Exhaustion of domestic remedies No violation of Article 3 Prohibition of torture Article 3 Degrading treatment Inhuman treatment ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:1999:1216JUD002488894https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-58594
CASE OF VINTER AND OTHERS v. THE UNITED KINGDOM
CASE OF VINTER AND OTHERS v. THE UNITED KINGDOM 66069/09 130/10 3896/10 CREIGHTON S. WEATHERBY P. VAN ZYL SMIT D. WOODS B. HORWELL R. HINDMARSH L. CHIVERS SOLICITORS BINGLEY McKONE M. GBR 7/9/2013 12:00:00 AM Violation of Article 3 Prohibition of torture ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2013:0709JUD006606909https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-122664
CONCLUDING OBSERVATIONS OF THE COMMITTEE ON THE ELIMINATION OF DISCRIMINATION AGAINST WOMEN : MAURITIUS
CONCLUDING OBSERVATIONS OF THE COMMITTEE ON THE ELIMINATION OF DISCRIMINATION AGAINST WOMEN : MAURITIUS CEDAW/C/MUS/CO/6 7 NULL 2011 11 08T00:00:00 CEDAW United Nations CEDAW/C/MUS/CO/6 7 Convention on the Elimination Distr.: General of All Forms of UHRICEDAW/C/MUS/CO/6-7https://uhri.ohchr.org/en/document/96525c4f-c8cf-477b-9207-3925d9f7c844
Chytil v. Czech Republic
Chytil v. Czech Republic CCPR/C/90/D/1452/2006 Communication number s : 1452/2006 Author: Renatus J. Chytil Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 90 Country Czech Republic Submission date 16 Jan 2006 Date of decision 24 Jul 2007 Comment: JUTBCCPR/C/90/D/1452/2006https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1001/en-US
Concluding observations on the fifth periodic report of Mauritius
Concluding observations on the fifth periodic report of Mauritius E/C.12/MUS/CO/5 NULL 2019 04 05T00:00:00 CESCR United Nations E/C.12/MUS/CO/5 Distr.: General Economic and Social Council 5 April 2019 Original: English Committee on Economic Social and UHRIE/C.12/MUS/CO/5https://uhri.ohchr.org/en/document/ec0dfdfe-0ca3-4772-b81e-b8a4734d7ac6
D.V. and H.V. v. Czech Republic
D.V. and H.V. v. Czech Republic CCPR/C/105/D/1848/2008 Communication number s : 1848/2008 Author: D.V. and H.V. Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 105 Country Czech Republic Submission date 07 Sep 2006 Date of decision 23 Jul 2012 JUTBCCPR/C/105/D/1848/2008https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1343/en-US
Dranichnikov v. Australia
Dranichnikov v. Australia CCPR/C/88/D/1291/2004 Communication number s : 1291/2004 Author: Olga Dranichnikov Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 88 Country Australia Submission date 01 Jun 2004 Date of decision 20 Oct 2006 Comment: Pursuant to JUTBCCPR/C/88/D/1291/2004https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1327/en-US
Dvorak v. Czech Republic
Dvorak v. Czech Republic CCPR/C/96/D/1614/2007 Communication number s : 1614/2007 Author: Dagmar Dvorak Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 96 Country Czech Republic Submission date 24 Nov 2006 Date of decision 28 Jul 2009 Comment: This JUTBCCPR/C/96/D/1614/2007https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1528/en-US
F.A.J. and B.M.R.A. v. Spain
F.A.J. and B.M.R.A. v. Spain CCPR/C/130/D/3599/2019 Communication number s : 3599/2019 Author: F.A.J. and B.M.R.A. Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 130 Country Spain Submission date 14 Jan 2019 Date of decision 28 Oct 2020 Comment: JUTBCCPR/C/130/D/3599/2019https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/3286/en-US
G. K. v. Netherlands
G. K. v. Netherlands CCPR/C/104/D/1801/2008 Communication number s : 1801/2008 Author: G. K. Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 104 Country Netherlands Submission date 30 Jul 2008 Date of decision 22 Mar 2012 Comment: Pursuant to rule 90 of JUTBCCPR/C/104/D/1801/2008https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1660/en-US