Search
Data source
EU member states
Other countries
Keywords
Tags
Displaying 1 - 20 of 81
A.F. v. Italy
A.F. v. Italy CEDAW/C/82/D/148/2019 Communication number s : 148/2019 Author: A.F. Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 82 Country Italy Submission date 16 Aug 2018 Date of decision 20 Jun 2022 Comment: This document has no comment: Substantive JUTBCEDAW/C/82/D/148/2019https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/3205/en-US
A/HRC/47/14: Report of the Working Group on the Universal Periodic Review - Rwanda
United Nations A/HRC/47/14 General Assembly Distr.: General 25 March 2021 Original: English Human Rights Council Forty seventh session 21 June 9 July 2021 Agenda item 6 Universal periodic review Report of the Working Group on the Universal Periodic Review UPRA/HRC/47/14https://www.ohchr.org//en/documents/country-reports/ahrc4714-report-working-group-universal-periodic-review-rwanda
Bakar Japalali and Carmen Baloyo-Japalali v. Philippines
Bakar Japalali and Carmen Baloyo Japalali v. Philippines CCPR/C/125/D/2536/2015 Communication number s : 2536/2015 Author: Hadji Hamid Japalali Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 125 Country Philippines Submission date 01 Sep 2014 Date of JUTBCCPR/C/125/D/2536/2015https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2569/en-US
CASE OF JALOUD v. THE NETHERLANDS
CASE OF JALOUD v. THE NETHERLANDS 47708/08 ZEGVELD L. EIKELBOOM A.W. NLD 11/20/2014 12:00:00 AM Violation of Article 2 Right to life Article 2 Positive obligations Article 2 1 Effective investigation Procedural aspect Non pecuniary damage award Article 38 ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2014:1120JUD004770808https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-148367
CASE OF MIAILHE v. FRANCE (No. 1)
CASE OF MIAILHE v. FRANCE No. 1 12661/87 N/A FRA 2/25/1993 12:00:00 AM Preliminary objection rejected non exhaustion Violation of Art. 8 Not necessary to examine Art. 13 Just satisfaction reserved Customs Code Articles 64 453 454 458 Budget Act of 30 ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:1993:0225JUD001266187https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-57811
CASE OF MIAILHE v. FRANCE (No. 1) (ARTICLE 50)
CASE OF MIAILHE v. FRANCE No. 1 ARTICLE 50 12661/87 N/A FRA 11/29/1993 12:00:00 AM Pecuniary damage claim dismissed Non pecuniary damage financial award Costs and expenses partial award domestic proceedings Costs and expenses award Convention proceedings ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:1993:1129JUD001266187https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-57855
CASE OF MIAILHE v. FRANCE (No. 2)
CASE OF MIAILHE v. FRANCE No. 2 18978/91 N/A FRA 9/26/1996 12:00:00 AM Preliminary objection joined to merits victim Preliminary objection rejected victim Preliminary objection rejected non exhaustion of domestic remedies Preliminary objection rejected ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:1996:0926JUD001897891https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-58077
CASE OF SILIADIN v. FRANCE
CASE OF SILIADIN v. FRANCE 73316/01 CLEMENT H. FRA 7/26/2005 12:00:00 AM Preliminary objection joined to merits and rejected victim Violation of Art. 4 Costs and expenses award Convention proceedings Criminal Code former Articles 225 13 225 14 Information ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2005:0726JUD007331601https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-69891
CMW/C/TLS/CO/1 TIMOR LESTE
CMW/C/TLS/CO/1 TIMOR LESTE CMW/C/TLS/CO/1 NULL 2015 10 07T00:00:00 CMW United Nations CMW/C/TLS/CO/1 International Convention on the Distr.: General 8 October 2015 Protection of the Rights of All Migrant Workers and Original: English Members of Their UHRICMW/C/TLS/CO/1https://uhri.ohchr.org/en/document/53fc818d-53b2-49c4-95e0-ce704a88e13d
CONCLUDING OBSERVATIONS OF THE HUMAN RIGHTS COMMITTEE : PHILIPPINES
CONCLUDING OBSERVATIONS OF THE HUMAN RIGHTS COMMITTEE : PHILIPPINES CCPR/C/PHL/CO/4 NULL 2012 11 13T00:00:00 CCPR United Nations CCPR/C/PHL/CO/4 International Covenant on Distr.: General 13 November 2012 Civil and Political Rights Original: English Human UHRICCPR/C/PHL/CO/4https://uhri.ohchr.org/en/document/3bd1af89-55f3-4925-ba51-0acb635ba7c5
Engo v. Cameroon
Engo v. Cameroon CCPR/C/96/D/1397/2005 Communication number s : 1397/2005 Author: Pierre D sir Engo Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 96 Country Cameroon Submission date 30 Mar 2005 Date of decision 22 Jul 2009 Comment: This document has no JUTBCCPR/C/96/D/1397/2005https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1527/en-US
G.M.N.F. v. Netherlands
G.M.N.F. v. Netherlands CEDAW/C/75/D/117/2017 Communication number s : 117/2017 Author: G.M.N.F. Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 75 Country Netherlands Submission date 12 Apr 2017 Date of decision 17 Feb 2020 Comment: This document JUTBCEDAW/C/75/D/117/2017https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/3129/en-US
Hamadie Al-Gertani v. Bosnia and Herzegovina
Hamadie Al Gertani v. Bosnia and Herzegovina CCPR/C/109/D/1955/2010 Communication number s : 1955/2010 Author: Zeyad Khalaf Hamadie Al Gertani Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 109 Country Bosnia and Herzegovina Submission date 04 Jun 2010 JUTBCCPR/C/109/D/1955/2010https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1690/en-US
Human Rights Council Adopts Universal Periodic Review Outcomes of India, Finland, and the Philippines
AFTERNOON 27 March 2023 The Human Rights Council this afternoon adopted the Universal Periodic Review outcomes of India Finland and the Philippines. The Council adopted the Universal Periodic Review outcome of India. The Vice President said 221 UPRhttps://www.ohchr.org//en/news/2023/03/human-rights-council-adopts-universal-periodic-review-outcomes-india-finland-and
Human Rights Council Adopts Universal Periodic Review Outcomes of Oman, Austria, and Rwanda
8 July 2021 The Human Rights Council this afternoon adopted the Universal Periodic Review outcomes of Oman Austria and Rwanda. Speaking on the Universal Periodic Review outcome of Oman were Nepal Pakistan Philippines Qatar Russian Federation Saudi Arabia UPRhttps://www.ohchr.org//en/press-releases/2021/07/human-rights-council-adopts-universal-periodic-review-outcomes-oman-austria
K.I.A. v. Denmark
K.I.A. v. Denmark CEDAW/C/74/D/82/2015 Communication number s : 82/2015 Author: K.I.A. Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 74 Country Denmark Submission date 08 Mar 2015 Date of decision 04 Nov 2019 Comment: This document has no comment: JUTBCEDAW/C/74/D/82/2015https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/3128/en-US
Maksudov, Rakhimov, Tashbaev and Pirmatov v. Kyrgyzstan,Uzbekistan
Maksudov Rakhimov Tashbaev and Pirmatov v. Kyrgyzstan Uzbekistan CCPR/C/93/D/1461 1462 1476 1477/2006 Communication number s : 1476/2006 1462/2006 1477/2006 1461/2006 Author: Zhakhongir Maksudov and Adil Rakhimov Yakub Tashbaev and Rasuldzhon Pirmatov JUTBCCPR/C/93/D/1461,1462,1476&1477/2006https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1445/en-US
Maya Abromchik v. Belarus
Maya Abromchik v. Belarus CCPR/C/122/D/2228/2012 Communication number s : 2228/2012 Author: Maya Abromchik Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 122 Country Belarus Submission date 09 Aug 2012 Date of decision 20 Mar 2018 Comment: This document JUTBCCPR/C/122/D/2228/2012https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2382/en-US
Natalya Pinchuk v. Belarus
Natalya Pinchuk v. Belarus CCPR/C/112/D/2165/2012 Communication number s : 2165/2012 Author: Natalya Pinchuk represented by counsel Antoine Bernard Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 112 Country Belarus Submission date 12 Apr 2012 Date of JUTBCCPR/C/112/D/2165/2012https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1938/en-US
P.F. and M.F. v. France
P.F. and M.F. v. France CCPR/C/130/D/2780/2016 Communication number s : 2780/2016 Author: P.F. and M.F. Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 130 Country France Submission date 14 Feb 2015 Date of decision 20 Oct 2020 Comment: Individual JUTBCCPR/C/130/D/2780/2016https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/3292/en-US