Search
Data source
EU member states
Other countries
Keywords
Tags
Displaying 1 - 20 of 79
4. International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights
STATUS AS AT : 14 06 2023 09:15:30 EDT CHAPTER IV HUMAN RIGHTS 4. International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights New York 16 December 1966 Entry into force : 23 March 1976 in accordance with article 49 for all provisions except those of article 41 UNIV-4https://treaties.un.org//Pages/ViewDetails.aspx?src=TREATY&mtdsg_no=IV-4&chapter=4&clang=_en
9. Convention against Torture and Other Cruel, Inhuman or Degrading Treatment or Punishment
STATUS AS AT : 14 06 2023 09:15:30 EDT CHAPTER IV HUMAN RIGHTS 9. Convention against Torture and Other Cruel Inhuman or Degrading Treatment or Punishment New York 10 December 1984 Entry into force : 26 June 1987 in accordance with article 27 1 . 1 UNIV-9https://treaties.un.org//Pages/ViewDetails.aspx?src=TREATY&mtdsg_no=IV-9&chapter=4&clang=_en
A/HRC/27/56/Add.2
A/HRC/27/56/Add.2 A/HRC/27/56/Add.2 NULL 2014 08 28T00:00:00 SR Truth justice reparation Addendum Mission to Uruguay Summary The Special Rapporteur on the promotion of truth justice reparation and guarantees of non recurrence Pablo de Greiff paid an UHRIA/HRC/27/56/Add.2https://uhri.ohchr.org/en/document/8159e491-d477-481e-be72-8ac2a8107329
A/HRC/46/6/Add.1: Report of the Working Group on the Universal Periodic Review - Liberia - Addendum
United Nations A/HRC/46/6/Add.1 General Assembly Distr.: General 8 March 2021 Original: English Human Rights Council Forty sixth session 22 February 19 March 2021 Agenda item 6 Universal periodic review Report of the Working Group on the Universal UPRA/HRC/46/6/Add.1https://www.ohchr.org//en/documents/country-reports/ahrc466add1-report-working-group-universal-periodic-review-liberia
Arredondo v. Peru
Arredondo v. Peru CCPR/C/69/D/688/1996 Communication number s : 688/1996 Author: Ms. Carolina Teillier Arredondo Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 69 Country Peru Submission date 17 Nov 1995 Date of decision 27 Jul 2000 Comment: This JUTBCCPR/C/69/D/688/1996https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/882/en-US
Barzana Yutronic v. Chile
Barzana Yutronic v. Chile CCPR/C/66/D/740/1997 Communication number s : 740/1997 Author: Vicente Barzana Yutronic Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 66 Country Chile Submission date 28 Jul 1996 Date of decision 23 Jul 1998 Comment: JUTBCCPR/C/66/D/740/1997https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/798/en-US
CASE OF AL-DULIMI AND MONTANA MANAGEMENT INC. v. SWITZERLAND
CASE OF AL DULIMI AND MONTANA MANAGEMENT INC. v. SWITZERLAND 5809/08 MICHEL J. C. OBEIDAT T. FRIES S. CHE 6/21/2016 12:00:00 AM Preliminary objection dismissed Art. 35 Admissibility criteria Art. 35 3 a Ratione personae Preliminary objection dismissed ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2016:0621JUD000580908https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-164515
CASE OF BAYATYAN v. ARMENIA
CASE OF BAYATYAN v. ARMENIA 23459/03 CARBONNEAU A. BURNS J.M. KHACHATRYAN R. ARM 7/7/2011 12:00:00 AM Violation of Art. 9 Non pecuniary damage award Article 75 of the Criminal Code 154 237 152 269 354 216 ECLI:CE:ECHR:2011:0707JUD002345903 GRAND CHAMBER ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2011:0707JUD002345903https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-105611
CASE OF GÎRLEANU v. ROMANIA
CASE OF G RLEANU v. ROMANIA 50376/09 HATNEANU D. O. ROU 6/26/2018 12:00:00 AM Violation of Article 10 Freedom of expression general Article 10 1 Freedom of expression Non pecuniary damage award Article 41 Non pecuniary damage Just satisfaction Articles 12 ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2018:0626JUD005037609https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-184064
CASE OF GROSAM v. THE CZECH REPUBLIC
CASE OF GROSAM v. THE CZECH REPUBLIC 19750/13 DAJBYCH J. CZE 6/1/2023 12:00:00 AM Preliminary objection allowed Art. 35 Admissibility criteria Art 35 1 Four month period former six month Inadmissible Art. 35 Admissibility criteria Art 35 1 Four month ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2023:0601JUD001975013https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-225231
CASE OF JONES AND OTHERS v. THE UNITED KINGDOM
CASE OF JONES AND OTHERS v. THE UNITED KINGDOM 34356/06 40528/06 CUKIER G. ALLEN T. GBR 1/14/2014 12:00:00 AM No violation of Article 6 Right to a fair trial Article 6 Criminal proceedings Article 6 1 Access to court No violation of Article 6 Right to a ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2014:0114JUD003435606https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-140005
CASE OF MARGUŠ v. CROATIA
CASE OF MARGU v. CROATIA 4455/10 SABOLIC P. HRV 5/27/2014 12:00:00 AM Preliminary objection dismissed Article 35 3 Ratione temporis Remainder inadmissible No violation of Article 6 Right to a fair trial Article 6 Criminal proceedings Article 6 1 Impartial ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2014:0527JUD000445510https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-144276
CASE OF MOCANU AND OTHERS v. ROMANIA
CASE OF MOCANU AND OTHERS v. ROMANIA 10865/09 45886/07 32431/08 POPESCU A. SFIRAIALA I. MATEI I. NACEA D. HARTNEANU D.O. ROU 9/17/2014 12:00:00 AM Preliminary objections dismissed Article 35 1 Exhaustion of domestic remedies Six month period Article 35 3 ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2014:0917JUD001086509https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-146540
CASE OF MURTAZALIYEVA v. RUSSIA
CASE OF MURTAZALIYEVA v. RUSSIA 36658/05 KOROTEYEV K.N. RUS 12/18/2018 12:00:00 AM Preliminary objection allowed Art. 35 Admissibility criteria Art. 35 3 a Manifestly ill founded Remainder inadmissible Art. 35 Admissibility criteria Art. 35 3 a Manifestly ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2018:1218JUD003665805https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-187932
CASE OF NAÏT-LIMAN v. SWITZERLAND
CASE OF NA T LIMAN v. SWITZERLAND 51357/07 TRIAL INTERNATIONAL CHE 3/15/2018 12:00:00 AM No violation of Article 6 Right to a fair trial Article 6 Civil proceedings Article 6 1 Access to court Article 41 of the Swiss Code of Obligations Section 3 of the ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2018:0315JUD005135707https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-181789
CASE OF NAIT-LIMAN v. SWITZERLAND
CASE OF NAIT LIMAN v. SWITZERLAND 51357/07 MEMBREZ F. CHE 6/21/2016 12:00:00 AM No violation of Article 6 Right to a fair trial Article 6 Civil proceedings Article 6 1 Access to court 445 40 7 354 ECLI:CE:ECHR:2016:0621JUD005135707 SECOND SECTION CASE OF ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2016:0621JUD005135707https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-164470
CASE OF PERİNÇEK v. SWITZERLAND
CASE OF PER N EK v. SWITZERLAND 27510/08 CENGIZ M. CHE 12/17/2013 12:00:00 AM Remainder inadmissible Violation of Article 10 Freedom of expression General Article 10 1 Freedom of expression Pecuniary damage claim dismissed Non pecuniary damage finding of ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2013:1217JUD002751008https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-139724
CASE OF SÖDERMAN v. SWEDEN
CASE OF S DERMAN v. SWEDEN 5786/08 SODERGREN J. LEWIS K. CRAFOORD C. SWE 11/12/2013 12:00:00 AM Violation of Article 8 Right to respect for private and family life Article 8 Positive obligations Article 8 1 Respect for private life Non pecuniary damage ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2013:1112JUD000578608https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-128043
CASE OF STOLL v. SWITZERLAND
CASE OF STOLL v. SWITZERLAND 69698/01 KELLER H. CHE 12/10/2007 12:00:00 AM No violation of Art. 10 Article 293 of the Criminal Code 149 148 265 326 238 354 ECLI:CE:ECHR:2007:1210JUD006969801 GRAND CHAMBER CASE OF STOLL v. SWITZERLAND Application no. ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2007:1210JUD006969801https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-83870
CASE OF T.K. AND S.R. v. RUSSIA
CASE OF T.K. AND S.R. v. RUSSIA 28492/15 49975/15 YERMOLAYEVA N. RUS 11/19/2019 12:00:00 AM No violation of Article 3 Prohibition of torture Article 3 Extradition Conditional Kyrgyzstan 350 618 ECLI:CE:ECHR:2019:1119JUD002849215 THIRD SECTION CASE OF T.K. ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2019:1119JUD002849215https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-198477