Search
Data source
EU member states
Other countries
Keywords
Tags
Displaying 1 - 20 of 302
Ambaryan v. Kyrgyzstan
Ambaryan v. Kyrgyzstan CCPR/C/120/D/2162/2012 Communication number s : 2162/2012 Author: Arsen Ambaryan Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 120 Country Kyrgyzstan Submission date 20 Apr 2012 Date of decision 28 Jul 2017 Comment: Annex: JUTBCCPR/C/120/D/2162/2012https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2307/en-US
B. & C. v. Czech Republic
B. C. v. Czech Republic CCPR/C/113/D/1967/2010 Communication number s : 1967/2010 Author: B. and C. Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 113 Country Czech Republic Submission date 18 Sep 2009 Date of decision 02 Apr 2015 Comment: This JUTBCCPR/C/113/D/1967/2010https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1944/en-US
CASE OF A AND B v. NORWAY
CASE OF A AND B v. NORWAY 24130/11 29758/11 KJELDAHL R. NOR 11/15/2016 12:00:00 AM No violation of Article 4 of Protocol No. 7 Right not to be tried or punished twice general Article 4 of Protocol No. 7 Right not to be tried or punished twice Criminal ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2016:1115JUD002413011https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-168972
CASE OF A.P., GARÇON AND NICOT v. FRANCE
CASE OF A.P. GAR ON AND NICOT v. FRANCE 79885/12 52471/13 52596/13 SCP GATINEAU FATTACCINI SCP THOUIN PALAT BOUCARD FOURNIER J. PIERRAT E. FRA 4/6/2017 12:00:00 AM Remainder inadmissible Violation of Article 8 Right to respect for private and family life ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2017:0406JUD007988512https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-172913
CASE OF ABDI IBRAHIM v. NORWAY
CASE OF ABDI IBRAHIM v. NORWAY 15379/16 LUTINA A. NOR 12/10/2021 12:00:00 AM Violation of Article 8 Right to respect for private and family life Article 8 1 Respect for family life read in the light of Article 9 Art. 9 Freedom of thought conscience and ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2021:1210JUD001537916https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-214433
CASE OF ABU ZUBAYDAH v. LITHUANIA
CASE OF ABU ZUBAYDAH v. LITHUANIA 46454/11 DUFFY H. MICKUM IV G.B. MARGULIES J. LTU 5/31/2018 12:00:00 AM Preliminary objection dismissed Art. 34 Individual applications Art. 34 Victim Preliminary objections joined to merits and dismissed Art. 35 ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2018:0531JUD004645411https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-183687
CASE OF AL-DULIMI AND MONTANA MANAGEMENT INC. v. SWITZERLAND
CASE OF AL DULIMI AND MONTANA MANAGEMENT INC. v. SWITZERLAND 5809/08 MICHEL J. C. CHE 11/26/2013 12:00:00 AM Preliminary objection dismissed Article 35 3 Ratione personae Preliminary objection dismissed Article 35 3 Ratione materiae Remainder inadmissible ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2013:1126JUD000580908https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-138948
CASE OF AL-DULIMI AND MONTANA MANAGEMENT INC. v. SWITZERLAND
CASE OF AL DULIMI AND MONTANA MANAGEMENT INC. v. SWITZERLAND 5809/08 MICHEL J. C. OBEIDAT T. FRIES S. CHE 6/21/2016 12:00:00 AM Preliminary objection dismissed Art. 35 Admissibility criteria Art. 35 3 a Ratione personae Preliminary objection dismissed ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2016:0621JUD000580908https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-164515
CASE OF AL NASHIRI v. POLAND
CASE OF AL NASHIRI v. POLAND 28761/11 GOLDSTON J.A. SKILBECK R. SINGH A. HOLLANDER N. POL 7/24/2014 12:00:00 AM Preliminary objection joined to merits and dismissed Art. 35 Admissibility criteria Art. 35 1 Exhaustion of domestic remedies Remainder ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2014:0724JUD002876111https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-146044
CASE OF AL NASHIRI v. ROMANIA
CASE OF AL NASHIRI v. ROMANIA 33234/12 GOLDSTON J.A. SKILBECK R. SINGH A. HOLLANDER N. HATNEANU D.O. ROU 5/31/2018 12:00:00 AM Preliminary objections joined to merits and dismissed Art. 35 Admissibility criteria Art. 35 1 Exhaustion of domestic remedies ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2018:0531JUD003323412https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-183685
CASE OF ALIYEV v. AZERBAIJAN
CASE OF ALIYEV v. AZERBAIJAN 68762/14 71200/14 REMEZAITE R. JAVADOV J. AZE 9/20/2018 12:00:00 AM Remainder inadmissible Art. 35 Admissibility criteria Art. 35 1 Exhaustion of domestic remedies No violation of Article 3 Prohibition of torture Article 3 ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2018:0920JUD006876214https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-186126
CASE OF ALTINAY v. TURKEY
CASE OF ALTINAY v. TURKEY 37222/04 N/A TUR 7/9/2013 12:00:00 AM No violation of Article 14 P1 2 Prohibition of discrimination Article 14 Discrimination Article 2 of Protocol No. 1 Right to education general Violation of Article 14 P1 2 Prohibition of ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2013:0709JUD003722204https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-122497
CASE OF ANDREJEVA v. LATVIA
CASE OF ANDREJEVA v. LATVIA 55707/00 BUZAJEVS V. LVA 2/18/2009 12:00:00 AM Preliminary objections dismissed Violation of Art. 14 P1 1 Violation of Art. 6 1 Pecuniary and non pecuniary damage award Articles 90 and 471 of the Civil Procedure Act Article 2 ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2009:0218JUD005570700https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-91388
CASE OF ANDRONICOU AND CONSTANTINOU v. CYPRUS
CASE OF ANDRONICOU AND CONSTANTINOU v. CYPRUS 25052/94 N/A CYP 10/9/1997 12:00:00 AM Preliminary objection rejected abuse of process Preliminary objection rejected non exhaustion of domestic remedies No violation of Art. 2 No violation of Art. 6 1 ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:1997:1009JUD002505294https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-58102
CASE OF APICELLA v. ITALY
CASE OF APICELLA v. ITALY 64890/01 DE NIGRIS DE MARIA S. ITA 3/29/2006 12:00:00 AM Preliminary objection dismissed Article 35 1 Exhaustion of domestic remedies Preliminary objection dismissed Article 34 Victim Violation of Article 6 Right to a fair trial ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2006:0329JUD006489001https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-72935
CASE OF BÉLÁNÉ NAGY v. HUNGARY
CASE OF B L N NAGY v. HUNGARY 53080/13 CECH A. HUN 2/10/2015 12:00:00 AM Violation of Article 1 of Protocol No. 1 Protection of property Article 1 para. 1 of Protocol No. 1 Peaceful enjoyment of possessions Pecuniary and non pecuniary damage award Article ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2015:0210JUD005308013https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-150998
CASE OF B. v. FRANCE
CASE OF B. v. FRANCE 13343/87 N/A FRA 3/25/1992 12:00:00 AM Preliminary objection rejected non exhaustion Preliminary objection rejected six month period Violation of Art. 8 Not necessary to examine Art. 3 Non pecuniary damage financial award Pecuniary ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:1992:0325JUD001334387https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-57770
CASE OF BARA AND KOLA v. ALBANIA
CASE OF BARA AND KOLA v. ALBANIA 43391/18 17766/19 BARA B. BARA J. DODA A. ALB 10/12/2021 12:00:00 AM Remainder inadmissible Art. 35 Admissibility criteria Art. 35 1 Exhaustion of domestic remedies Violation of Article 6 Right to a fair trial Article 6 ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2021:1012JUD004339118https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-211933
CASE OF BELVEDERE ALBERGHIERA S.R.L. v. ITALY
CASE OF BELVEDERE ALBERGHIERA S.R.L. v. ITALY 31524/96 N/A ITA 5/30/2000 12:00:00 AM Violation of P1 1 Just satisfaction reserved Law no. 85 of 22 October 1971 Court of Cassation judgment no. 1464 of 16 February 1983 369 94 321 149 316 140 216 ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2000:0530JUD003152496https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-58834
CASE OF BIG BROTHER WATCH AND OTHERS v. THE UNITED KINGDOM
CASE OF BIG BROTHER WATCH AND OTHERS v. THE UNITED KINGDOM 58170/13 62322/14 24960/15 CAREY D. CURLING R. NORTON E. GBR 9/13/2018 12:00:00 AM Remainder inadmissible Art. 35 Admissibility criteria Art. 35 3 a Manifestly ill founded Violation of Article 8 ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2018:0913JUD005817013https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-186048