Search
Data source
EU member states
Other countries
Keywords
Tags
Displaying 1 - 20 of 735
5th Round Evaluation Report on Poland
5th Round Evaluation Report on Poland POL 2018 12 07 2019 01 28 Adoption: 7 December 2018 Publication: 28 January 2019 Public GrecoEval5Rep 2018 1 FIFTH EVALUATION ROUND Preventing corruption and promoting integrity in central governments top executive GRECOGrecoEval5Rep(2018)1-Final-eng-Poland-PUBLIChttps://hudoc.greco.coe.int/eng?i=GrecoEval5Rep%282018%291-Final-eng-Poland-PUBLIC
9. b Optional Protocol to the Convention against Torture and Other Cruel, Inhuman or Degrading Treatment or Punishment
STATUS AS AT : 14 06 2023 09:15:30 EDT CHAPTER IV HUMAN RIGHTS 9. b Optional Protocol to the Convention against Torture and Other Cruel Inhuman or Degrading Treatment or Punishment New York 18 December 2002 Entry into force : 22 June 2006 in accordance UNIV-9-bhttps://treaties.un.org//Pages/ViewDetails.aspx?src=TREATY&mtdsg_no=IV-9-b&chapter=4&clang=_en
A. R. A. v. Sweden
A. R. A. v. Sweden CAT/C/38/D/305/2006 Communication number s : 305/2006 Author: A. R. A. Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 38 Country Sweden Submission date 25 Sep 2006 Date of decision 30 Apr 2007 Comment: This document has no JUTBCAT/C/38/D/305/2006https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/100/en-US
A.S.M. and R.A.H. v. Denmark,Italy
A.S.M. and R.A.H. v. Denmark Italy CCPR/C/117/D/2378/2014 Communication number s : 2378/2014 Author: A.S.M. and R.A.H. Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 117 Country Denmark Italy Submission date 14 Apr 2014 Date of decision 07 Jul 2016 JUTBCCPR/C/117/D/2378/2014https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2245/en-US
A. et al. v. Uzbekistan
A. et al. v. Uzbekistan CCPR/C/98/D/1079/2002 Communication number s : 1079/2002 Author: A. et al. Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 98 Country Uzbekistan Submission date 29 Apr 2002 Date of decision 19 Mar 2010 Comment: This document JUTBCCPR/C/98/D/1079/2002https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1545/en-US
ANANYEV AND OTHERS v. Russia
ANANYEV AND OTHERS v. Russia RUS 04/10/2012 00:00:00 04/11/2016 11:41:33 Case Description: This group of cases concerns in particular poor conditions of pre trial detention in the remand centres SIZO under the authority of the Federal Penitentiary Service EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-14142
ANDORRA: CONCLUDING OBSERVATIONS
ANDORRA: CONCLUDING OBSERVATIONS CERD/C/AND/CO/1 6 NULL 2019 05 22T00:00:00 CERD United Nations CERD/C/AND/CO/1 6 International Convention on Distr.: General 22 May 2019 the Elimination of All Forms English of Racial Discrimination Original: French UHRICERD/C/AND/CO/1-6https://uhri.ohchr.org/en/document/43783802-adee-4862-8fc8-0ce80e15d3b4
ANDREJEVA v. Latvia
ANDREJEVA v. Latvia LVA 18/02/2009 00:00:00 03/11/2016 17:30:55 Case Description: Discrimination in conjunction with the right to property and access to and efficient functioning of justice: Refusal of authorities to take the applicant s years of EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-12614
ANNUAL REPORT OF THE WORKING GROUP ON THE USE OF MERCENARIES AS A MEANS OF VIOLATING HUMAN RIGHTS AND IMPEDING THE EXERCISE OF THE RIGHT OF PEOPLES TO SELF-DETERMINATION ADDENDUM : MISSION TO HONDURAS
ANNUAL REPORT OF THE WORKING GROUP ON THE USE OF MERCENARIES AS A MEANS OF VIOLATING HUMAN RIGHTS AND IMPEDING THE EXERCISE OF THE RIGHT OF PEOPLES TO SELF DETERMINATION ADDENDUM : MISSION TO HONDURAS A/HRC/24/45/Add.1 NULL 2013 08 05T00:00:00 WG UHRIA/HRC/24/45/Add.1https://uhri.ohchr.org/en/document/3da0110e-6a50-4290-bd4f-20e5594b1e7b
Almas Kusherbaev v. Kazakhstan
Almas Kusherbaev v. Kazakhstan CCPR/C/107/D/2027/2011 Communication number s : 2027/2011 Author: Almas Kusherbaev Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 107 Country Kazakhstan Submission date 06 Sep 2010 Date of decision 25 Mar 2013 JUTBCCPR/C/107/D/2027/2011https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1278/en-US
Amundson v. Czech Republic
Amundson v. Czech Republic CCPR/C/95/D/1508/2006 Communication number s : 1508/2006 Author: Olga Amundson Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 95 Country Czech Republic Submission date 13 Mar 2006 Date of decision 17 Mar 2009 Comment: This JUTBCCPR/C/95/D/1508/2006https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1497/en-US
Anna Belousova v. Kazakhstan
Anna Belousova v. Kazakhstan CEDAW/C/61/D/45/2012 Communication number s : 045/2012 Author: Anna Belousova Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 61 Country Kazakhstan Submission date 12 Sep 2012 Date of decision 13 Jul 2015 Comment: This JUTBCEDAW/C/61/D/45/2012https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2053/en-US
BARRILLOT v. France
BARRILLOT v. France FRA 29/07/2003 00:00:00 08/11/2016 11:10:23 Case Description: Access to and efficient functioning of justice: Excessive length of criminal proceedings in particular excessive length of the pre trial investigation stage. Article 6 1 EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-32553
BIONDIC v. Croatia
BIONDIC v. Croatia HRV 02/06/2008 00:00:00 03/11/2016 16:22:41 Case Description: Access to and efficient functioning of justice: Lack of access to a court in civil proceedings instituted by a third party to contest an inheritance due to the rejection of EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-12199
Ben Ali v. Tunisia
Ben Ali v. Tunisia CCPR/C/115/D/2130/2012 Communication number s : 2130/2012 Author: Zine El Abidine Ben Ali Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 115 Country Tunisia Submission date 19 Jan 2012 Date of decision 02 Nov 2015 Comment: This JUTBCCPR/C/115/D/2130/2012https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2083/en-US
C.R. v. France
C.R. v. France FRA 23/12/2003 00:00:00 08/11/2016 11:16:17 Case Description: Access to and efficient functioning of justice: Excessive length of civil proceedings and absence of an effective remedy. Articles 6 1 and 13 Status of Execution: Case closed. EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-33147
CASE OF A AND B v. NORWAY
CASE OF A AND B v. NORWAY 24130/11 29758/11 KJELDAHL R. NOR 11/15/2016 12:00:00 AM No violation of Article 4 of Protocol No. 7 Right not to be tried or punished twice general Article 4 of Protocol No. 7 Right not to be tried or punished twice Criminal ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2016:1115JUD002413011https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-168972
CASE OF A AND B v. ROMANIA
CASE OF A AND B v. ROMANIA 48442/16 48831/16 DRAGOMIR D. E. ROU 6/2/2020 12:00:00 AM Preliminary objections dismissed Art. 35 Admissibility criteria Art. 35 1 Exhaustion of domestic remedies Art. 35 3 a Abuse of the right of application No violation of ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2020:0602JUD004844216https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-202621
CASE OF A.H. AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA
CASE OF A.H. AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA 6033/13 8927/13 10549/13 12275/13 23890/13 26309/13 27161/13 29197/13 32224/13 32331/13 32351/13 32368/13 37173/13 38490/13 42340/13 42403/13 INTERNATIONAL PROTECTION CENTRE IN MOSCOW O REAR I. RUS 1/17/2017 12:00:00 AM ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2017:0117JUD000603313https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-170390
CASE OF A.S. v. NORWAY
CASE OF A.S. v. NORWAY 60371/15 HALLEN N. NOR 12/17/2019 12:00:00 AM Violation of Article 8 Right to respect for private and family life Article 8 1 Respect for family life 451 425 ECLI:CE:ECHR:2019:1217JUD006037115 SECOND SECTION CASE OF A.S. v. NORWAY ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2019:1217JUD006037115https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-199381