Search
Data source
EU member states
Other countries
Keywords
Tags
Displaying 761 - 780 of 899
Lee and 388 others v. Republic of Korea
Lee and 388 others v. Republic of Korea CCPR/C/130/D/2776/2016 Communication number s : 2776/2016 Author: Jung Hee Lee and 388 others Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 130 Country Republic of Korea Submission date 11 Dec 2015 Date of JUTBCCPR/C/130/D/2776/2016https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/3288/en-US
M'Barek v. Tunisia
M Barek v. Tunisia CAT/C/23/D/60/1996 Communication number s : 060/1996 Author: Khaled M Barek Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 23 Country Tunisia Submission date 06 Nov 1996 Date of decision 10 Nov 1999 Comment: See also Communication No. JUTBCAT/C/23/D/60/1996https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/219/en-US
M.H. v. Finland
M.H. v. Finland CRC/C/83/D/23/2017 Communication number s : 023/2017 Author: M.H. Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 83 Country Finland Submission date 29 Mar 2017 Date of decision 03 Feb 2020 Comment: This document has no comment: JUTBCRC/C/83/D/23/2017https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2628/en-US
Malika Bendjael et al. v. Algeria
Malika Bendjael et al. v. Algeria CCPR/C/128/D/2893/2016 Communication number s : 2893/2016 Author: Malika Bendjael and Merouane Bendjael Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 128 Country Algeria Submission date 08 Apr 2016 Date of decision 27 JUTBCCPR/C/128/D/2893/2016https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2870/en-US
María Dolores Martín Pozo v. Spain
Mar a Dolores Mart n Pozo v. Spain CCPR/C/126/D/2541/2015 Communication number s : 2541/2015 Author: Mar a Dolores Mart n Pozo Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 126 Country Spain Submission date 28 Jul 2014 Date of decision 18 Jul 2019 JUTBCCPR/C/126/D/2541/2015https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2790/en-US
Mohamed Rabbae v. Netherlands
Mohamed Rabbae v. Netherlands CCPR/C/117/D/2124/2011 Communication number s : 2124/2011 Author: Mohamed Rabbae Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 117 Country Netherlands Submission date 15 Nov 2011 Date of decision 14 Jul 2016 Comment: This JUTBCCPR/C/117/D/2124/2011https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2153/en-US
N.K. v. Netherlands
N.K. v. Netherlands CCPR/C/120/D/2326/2013 Communication number s : 2326/2013 Author: N.K. Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 120 Country Netherlands Submission date 10 Dec 2013 Date of decision 18 Jul 2017 Comment: This document has no JUTBCCPR/C/120/D/2326/2013https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/3103/en-US
N.K. v. Netherlands
N.K. v. Netherlands CCPR/C/120/D/2326/2013/REV.1 Communication number s : 2326/2013 Author: N.K. Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 120 Country Netherlands Submission date 10 Dec 2013 Date of decision 18 Jul 2017 Comment: Annex: Individual JUTBCCPR/C/120/D/2326/2013/REV.1https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2317/en-US
NEDIM SENER v. Turkey
NEDIM SENER v. Turkey TUR 08/10/2014 00:00:00 10/11/2016 16:04:14 Case Description: These groups mainly concern unjustified and disproportionate interferences with the applicants freedom of expression on account of criminal proceedings for having EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-37296
Nataliya Litvin v. Ukraine
Nataliya Litvin v. Ukraine CCPR/C/102/D/1535/2006 Communication number s : 1535/2006 Author: Nataliya Litvin Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 102 Country Ukraine Submission date 15 Jun 2006 Date of decision 19 Jul 2011 Comment: The text of JUTBCCPR/C/102/D/1535/2006https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1593/en-US
O v. Norway
O v. Norway NOR 11/05/2003 00:00:00 20/10/2016 18:39:43 Case Description: Access to and efficient functioning of justice: Disrespect of the presumption of innocence on account of judicial acts implying suspicion of criminal guilt in compensation EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-179
ONER AND TURK v. Turkey
ONER AND TURK v. Turkey TUR 30/06/2015 00:00:00 10/11/2016 11:41:27 Case Description: These groups mainly concern unjustified and disproportionate interferences with the applicants freedom of expression on account of criminal proceedings for having EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-36806
OPUZ v. Turkey
OPUZ v. Turkey TUR 09/09/2009 00:00:00 10/11/2016 15:53:30 Case Description: This group of cases concerns the failure of the authorities to protect women the applicants or their female relatives from domestic violence despite having been reasonably EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-37222
Pérez Escolar v. Spain
P rez Escolar v. Spain CCPR/C/86/D/1156/2003 Communication number s : 1156/2003 Author: Rafael P rez Escolar Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 86 Country Spain Submission date 13 Dec 2002 Date of decision 28 Mar 2006 Comment: This document JUTBCCPR/C/86/D/1156/2003https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1252/en-US
POEM and FASM v. Denmark
POEM and FASM v. Denmark CERD/C/62/D/22/2002 Communication number s : 022/2002 Author: POEM and FASM Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 62 Country Denmark Submission date 08 Aug 2001 Date of decision 19 Mar 2003 Comment: This document JUTBCERD/C/62/D/22/2002https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1758/en-US
Paksas v. Lithuania
Paksas v. Lithuania CCPR/C/110/D/2155/2012 Communication number s : 2155/2012 Author: Rolandas Paksas Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 110 Country Lithuania Submission date 24 Jun 2011 Date of decision 25 Mar 2014 Comment: This document has JUTBCCPR/C/110/D/2155/2012https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1819/en-US
Paul Eric Kingue v. Cameroon
Paul Eric Kingue v. Cameroon CCPR/C/118/D/2388/2014 Communication number s : 2388/2014 Author: Paul Eric Kingue Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 118 Country Cameroon Submission date Date of decision Comment: This document has no comment: JUTBCCPR/C/118/D/2388/2014https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2234/en-US
Pelit v. Azerbaijan
Pelit v. Azerbaijan CAT/C/38/D/281/2005 Communication number s : 281/2005 Author: Elif Pelit Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 38 Country Azerbaijan Submission date 21 Sep 2005 Date of decision 01 May 2007 Comment: Date of admissibility JUTBCAT/C/38/D/281/2005https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/99/en-US
R.P.B. v. Philippines
R.P.B. v. Philippines CEDAW/C/57/D/34/2011 Communication number s : 034/2011 Author: R.P.B. represented by counsel Evalyn G. Ursua and Maria Karla L. Espinosa Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 57 Country Philippines Submission date 23 May JUTBCEDAW/C/57/D/34/2011https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1875/en-US
REPORT OF THE SPECIAL RAPPORTEUR ON EXTRAJUDICIAL, SUMMARY OR ARBITRARY EXECUTION S, PHILIP ALSTON : ADDENDUM: MISSION TO THE DEMOCRATIC REPUBLIC OF THE CONGO
REPORT OF THE SPECIAL RAPPORTEUR ON EXTRAJUDICIAL SUMMARY OR ARBITRARY EXECUTION S PHILIP ALSTON : ADDENDUM: MISSION TO THE DEMOCRATIC REPUBLIC OF THE CONGO A/HRC/14/24/Add.3 NULL 2010 06 14T06:00:00 SR Summary executions United Nations A/HRC/14/24/Add.3 UHRIA/HRC/14/24/Add.3https://uhri.ohchr.org/en/document/148bce0f-ac0f-4632-93a8-ae75e32afc04