Search
Data source
EU member states
Other countries
Keywords
Tags
Displaying 1 - 20 of 804
13. International Convention on the Protection of the Rights of All Migrant Workers and Members of their Families
STATUS AS AT : 14 06 2023 09:15:30 EDT CHAPTER IV HUMAN RIGHTS 13. International Convention on the Protection of the Rights of All Migrant Workers and Members of their Families New York 18 December 1990 Entry into force : 1 July 2003 in accordance with UNIV-13https://treaties.un.org//Pages/ViewDetails.aspx?src=TREATY&mtdsg_no=IV-13&chapter=4&clang=_en
4. International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights
STATUS AS AT : 14 06 2023 09:15:30 EDT CHAPTER IV HUMAN RIGHTS 4. International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights New York 16 December 1966 Entry into force : 23 March 1976 in accordance with article 49 for all provisions except those of article 41 UNIV-4https://treaties.un.org//Pages/ViewDetails.aspx?src=TREATY&mtdsg_no=IV-4&chapter=4&clang=_en
5th Round Evaluation Report on Poland
5th Round Evaluation Report on Poland POL 2018 12 07 2019 01 28 Adoption: 7 December 2018 Publication: 28 January 2019 Public GrecoEval5Rep 2018 1 FIFTH EVALUATION ROUND Preventing corruption and promoting integrity in central governments top executive GRECOGrecoEval5Rep(2018)1-Final-eng-Poland-PUBLIChttps://hudoc.greco.coe.int/eng?i=GrecoEval5Rep(2018)1-Final-eng-Poland-PUBLIC
A. A. C. v. Sweden
A. A. C. v. Sweden CAT/C/37/D/227/2003 Communication number s : 227/2003 Author: A.A.C. Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 37 Country Sweden Submission date 06 Feb 2003 Date of decision 16 Nov 2006 Comment: This document has no comment: JUTBCAT/C/37/D/227/2003https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/112/en-US
A.M.H. El Hojouj Jum’a et al v. Libya
A.M.H. El Hojouj Jum a et al v. Libya CCPR/C/111/D/1958/2010 Communication number s : 1958/2010 Author: A.M.H. El Hojouj Jum a et al Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 111 Country Libya Submission date 31 Mar 2010 Date of decision 21 Jul 2014 JUTBCCPR/C/111/D/1958/2010https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1849/en-US
A.N. v. Burundi
A.N. v. Burundi CAT/C/60/D/612/2014 Communication number s : 612/2014 Author: A.N. Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 60 Country Burundi Submission date 24 Mar 2014 Date of decision 02 May 2017 Comment: This document has no comment: JUTBCAT/C/60/D/612/2014https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/3018/en-US
ABDURRAHMAN TEKIN v. Turkey
ABDURRAHMAN TEKIN v. Turkey TUR 25/09/2018 00:00:00 10/10/2018 10:41:00 Case Description: Freedom of assembly and protection against ill treatment: Disproportionate interference due to the prosecution of participants in peaceful assemblies and use of EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-50395
AEPI S.A. v. Greece
AEPI S.A. v. Greece GRC 11/07/2002 00:00:00 07/11/2016 09:36:22 Case Description: Access to and efficient functioning of justice: Denial of excess to a court due to dismissals of appeals on points of law by the Court of Cassation as being out of time EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-22216
AKDAS v. Turkey
AKDAS v. Turkey TUR 16/05/2010 00:00:00 28/10/2016 19:22:17 Case Description: Freedom of expression: Disproportionate interference due to conviction of the publisher of the Turkish translation of the erotic novel Les Onze Mille Verges by Guillaume EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-5658
AKYAZICI v. Turkey
AKYAZICI v. Turkey TUR 15/03/2010 00:00:00 09/11/2016 16:41:20 Case Description: Access to and efficient functioning of justice: Denial of a fair trial on account of the non communication to the applicant the written opinion submitted by the Principal EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-35822
ASAN v. Turkey
ASAN v. Turkey TUR 27/02/2008 00:00:00 10/11/2016 15:45:20 Case Description: This group of cases concerns a violation of the right to freedom of expression on account of lack of reasoning and assessment of proportionality of an interference in judicial EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-37142
ATUTXA MENDIOLA AND OTHERS v. Spain
ATUTXA MENDIOLA AND OTHERS v. Spain ESP 13/09/2017 00:00:00 27/09/2017 10:04:06 Case Description: Functioning of justice: Unfair criminal proceedings due to the applicants conviction by the Supreme Court departing from the trial judgment which had EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-47733
AVETISYAN v. Armenia
AVETISYAN v. Armenia ARM 10/02/2017 00:00:00 09/03/2017 11:52:36 Case Description: Access to and efficient functioning of justice: Unfair criminal proceedings due to restriction of the right to examine witnesses whose testimony played a decisive role in EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-46121
Allakulov v. Uzbekistan
Allakulov v. Uzbekistan CCPR/C/120/D/2430/2014 Communication number s : 2430/2014 Author: Khidirnazar Allakulov Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 120 Country Uzbekistan Submission date 09 Sep 2011 Date of decision 19 Jul 2017 Comment: This JUTBCCPR/C/120/D/2430/2014https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2318/en-US
Annex - Third Evaluation Round Evaluation Report on Bosnia and Herzegovina Incriminations (ETS 173 and 191, GPC 2) (Theme I)
Annex Third Evaluation Round Evaluation Report on Bosnia and Herzegovina Incriminations ETS 173 and 191 GPC 2 Theme I BIH 2011 05 27 2011 08 17 Directorate General of Human Rights and Legal Affairs Directorate of Monitoring Strasbourg 27 May 2011 Public GRECOGreco-Eval-III-Rep-2010-5E-Final-BiH-STE-173-Annex-PUBLIChttps://hudoc.greco.coe.int/eng?i=Greco-Eval-III-Rep-2010-5E-Final-BiH-STE-173-Annex-PUBLIC
B.B. v. the United Kingdom
B.B. v. the United Kingdom GBR 07/07/2004 00:00:00 26/10/2016 20:41:06 Case Description: Discrimination / protection of private life: Discriminatory treatment on the ground of the applicant s sexual orientation due to this indictment for committing EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-3029
B.S. v. Spain
B.S. v. Spain ESP 24/10/2012 00:00:00 02/11/2016 09:41:36 Case Description: Protection against ill treatment and discrimination: Lack of effective investigation into allegations of racially motivated ill treatment inflicted by police agents. Article 3 EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-5760
BALITSKIY v. Ukraine
BALITSKIY v. Ukraine UKR 03/02/2012 00:00:00 08/11/2016 10:28:05 Case Description: This group of cases concerns the convictions of the applicants between 2002 and 2011 on the basis of self incriminating statements made in the absence of a lawyer and in EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-31116
BAYAR AND GURBUZ v. Turkey
BAYAR AND GURBUZ v. Turkey TUR 27/05/2013 00:00:00 10/11/2016 16:04:14 Case Description: Access to and efficient functioning of justice: Unfair criminal proceedings in 2004 on account of the inadmissibility of the applicants appeal on points of law on EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-37292
BEIZARAS AND LEVICKAS v. Lithuania
BEIZARAS AND LEVICKAS v. Lithuania LTU 14/05/2020 00:00:00 12/06/2020 16:56:20 Case Description: This case concerns the refusal of the law enforcement agencies due to their discriminatory attitudes to launch an investigation into the applicants EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-55375