Search
Data source
EU member states
Other countries
Keywords
Tags
Displaying 1 - 20 of 1260
4. International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights
STATUS AS AT : 14 06 2023 09:15:30 EDT CHAPTER IV HUMAN RIGHTS 4. International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights New York 16 December 1966 Entry into force : 23 March 1976 in accordance with article 49 for all provisions except those of article 41 UNIV-4https://treaties.un.org//Pages/ViewDetails.aspx?src=TREATY&mtdsg_no=IV-4&chapter=4&clang=_en
5th Round Evaluation Report on Poland
5th Round Evaluation Report on Poland POL 2018 12 07 2019 01 28 Adoption: 7 December 2018 Publication: 28 January 2019 Public GrecoEval5Rep 2018 1 FIFTH EVALUATION ROUND Preventing corruption and promoting integrity in central governments top executive GRECOGrecoEval5Rep(2018)1-Final-eng-Poland-PUBLIChttps://hudoc.greco.coe.int/eng?i=GrecoEval5Rep(2018)1-Final-eng-Poland-PUBLIC
A. A. C. v. Sweden
A. A. C. v. Sweden CAT/C/37/D/227/2003 Communication number s : 227/2003 Author: A.A.C. Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 37 Country Sweden Submission date 06 Feb 2003 Date of decision 16 Nov 2006 Comment: This document has no comment: JUTBCAT/C/37/D/227/2003https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/112/en-US
A.F. v. Italy
A.F. v. Italy CEDAW/C/82/D/148/2019 Communication number s : 148/2019 Author: A.F. Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 82 Country Italy Submission date 16 Aug 2018 Date of decision 20 Jun 2022 Comment: This document has no comment: Substantive JUTBCEDAW/C/82/D/148/2019https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/3205/en-US
A.N. v. Burundi
A.N. v. Burundi CAT/C/60/D/612/2014 Communication number s : 612/2014 Author: A.N. Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 60 Country Burundi Submission date 24 Mar 2014 Date of decision 02 May 2017 Comment: This document has no comment: JUTBCAT/C/60/D/612/2014https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/3018/en-US
ANNUAL REPORT OF THE WORKING GROUP ON THE USE OF MERCENARIES AS A MEANS OF VIOLATING HUMAN RIGHTS AND IMPEDING THE EXERCISE OF THE RIGHT OF PEOPLES TO SELF-DETERMINATION ADDENDUM : MISSION TO HONDURAS
ANNUAL REPORT OF THE WORKING GROUP ON THE USE OF MERCENARIES AS A MEANS OF VIOLATING HUMAN RIGHTS AND IMPEDING THE EXERCISE OF THE RIGHT OF PEOPLES TO SELF DETERMINATION ADDENDUM : MISSION TO HONDURAS A/HRC/24/45/Add.1 NULL 2013 08 05T00:00:00 WG UHRIA/HRC/24/45/Add.1https://uhri.ohchr.org/en/document/3da0110e-6a50-4290-bd4f-20e5594b1e7b
Abichou v. Germany
Abichou v. Germany CAT/C/50/D/430/2010 Communication number s : 430/2010 Author: Inass Abichou n e Seifeddine Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 50 Country Germany Submission date 25 Aug 2010 Date of decision 21 May 2013 Comment: This JUTBCAT/C/50/D/430/2010https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/9/en-US
Aboushanif v. Norway
Aboushanif v. Norway CCPR/C/93/D/1542/2007 Communication number s : 1542/2007 Author: Abdeel Keerem Hassan Aboushanif Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 93 Country Norway Submission date 20 Nov 2006 Date of decision 17 Jul 2008 Comment: Two JUTBCCPR/C/93/D/1542/2007https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1436/en-US
Achabal Puertas v. Spain
Achabal Puertas v. Spain CCPR/C/107/D/1945/2010 Communication number s : 1945/2010 Author: Mar a Cruz Achabal Puertas Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 107 Country Spain Submission date 02 Nov 2009 Date of decision 27 Mar 2013 Comment: The JUTBCCPR/C/107/D/1945/2010https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1317/en-US
Allakulov v. Uzbekistan
Allakulov v. Uzbekistan CCPR/C/120/D/2430/2014 Communication number s : 2430/2014 Author: Khidirnazar Allakulov Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 120 Country Uzbekistan Submission date 09 Sep 2011 Date of decision 19 Jul 2017 Comment: This JUTBCCPR/C/120/D/2430/2014https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2318/en-US
BALITSKIY v. Ukraine
BALITSKIY v. Ukraine UKR 03/02/2012 00:00:00 08/11/2016 10:28:05 Case Description: This group of cases concerns the convictions of the applicants between 2002 and 2011 on the basis of self incriminating statements made in the absence of a lawyer and in EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-31116
BEIZARAS AND LEVICKAS v. Lithuania
BEIZARAS AND LEVICKAS v. Lithuania LTU 14/05/2020 00:00:00 12/06/2020 16:56:20 Case Description: This case concerns the refusal of the law enforcement agencies due to their discriminatory attitudes to launch an investigation into the applicants EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-55375
Bessis v. France
Bessis v. France CCPR/C/133/D/3215/2018 Communication number s : 3215/2018 Author: Philippe Rudyard Bessis Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 133 Country France Submission date 26 Oct 2017 Date of decision 13 Oct 2021 Comment: This document JUTBCCPR/C/133/D/3215/2018https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/3114/en-US
Brown v. Namibia
Brown v. Namibia CCPR/C/93/D/1591/2007 Communication number s : 1591/2007 Author: Gordon Brown Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 93 Country Namibia Submission date 12 Sep 2007 Date of decision 23 Jul 2008 Comment: An individual opinion JUTBCCPR/C/93/D/1591/2007https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1378/en-US
CASE OF A AND B v. NORWAY
CASE OF A AND B v. NORWAY 24130/11 29758/11 KJELDAHL R. NOR 11/15/2016 12:00:00 AM No violation of Article 4 of Protocol No. 7 Right not to be tried or punished twice general Article 4 of Protocol No. 7 Right not to be tried or punished twice Criminal ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2016:1115JUD002413011https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-168972
CASE OF A.H. AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA
CASE OF A.H. AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA 6033/13 8927/13 10549/13 12275/13 23890/13 26309/13 27161/13 29197/13 32224/13 32331/13 32351/13 32368/13 37173/13 38490/13 42340/13 42403/13 INTERNATIONAL PROTECTION CENTRE IN MOSCOW O REAR I. RUS 1/17/2017 12:00:00 AM ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2017:0117JUD000603313https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-170390
CASE OF AĞRAKÇE v. TURKEY
CASE OF A RAK E v. TURKEY 29059/02 ONEREN O. TUR 11/4/2008 12:00:00 AM Violation of Article 6 Right to a fair trial 445 ECLI:CE:ECHR:2008:1104JUD002905902 SECOND SECTION CASE OF A RAK E v. TURKEY Application no. 29059/02 JUDGMENT STRASBOURG 4 November ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2008:1104JUD002905902https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-89267
CASE OF A. v. THE NETHERLANDS
CASE OF A. v. THE NETHERLANDS 4900/06 SCH LLER P.J. FERSCHTMAN M. NLD 7/20/2010 12:00:00 AM Violation of Art. 3 in case of expulsion to Libya No violation of Art. 13 Pecuniary damage claim dismissed Non pecuniary damage finding of violation sufficient 444 ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2010:0720JUD000490006https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-100038
CASE OF A. v. THE UNITED KINGDOM
CASE OF A. v. THE UNITED KINGDOM 25599/94 N/A GBR 9/23/1998 12:00:00 AM Violation of Art. 3 Not necessary to examine Art. 8 Not necessary to examine Art. 13 Not necessary to examine Art. 14 Non pecuniary damage financial award Costs and expenses partial ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:1998:0923JUD002559994https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-58232
CASE OF ABASHEV v. RUSSIA
CASE OF ABASHEV v. RUSSIA 9096/09 N/A RUS 6/27/2013 12:00:00 AM Remainder inadmissible Violation of Article 5 Right to liberty and security Article 5 5 Compensation Non pecuniary damage award Art. 133 3 of the Code of Criminal Procedure Art. 1070 of the ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2013:0627JUD000909609https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-121564