Search
Data source
EU member states
Other countries
Keywords
Tags
Displaying 21 - 40 of 2186
Annex - Third Evaluation Round Evaluation Report on Bosnia and Herzegovina Incriminations (ETS 173 and 191, GPC 2) (Theme I)
Annex Third Evaluation Round Evaluation Report on Bosnia and Herzegovina Incriminations ETS 173 and 191 GPC 2 Theme I BIH 2011 05 27 2011 08 17 Directorate General of Human Rights and Legal Affairs Directorate of Monitoring Strasbourg 27 May 2011 Public GRECOGreco-Eval-III-Rep-2010-5E-Final-BiH-STE-173-Annex-PUBLIChttps://hudoc.greco.coe.int/eng?i=Greco-Eval-III-Rep-2010-5E-Final-BiH-STE-173-Annex-PUBLIC
Arredondo v. Peru
Arredondo v. Peru CCPR/C/69/D/688/1996 Communication number s : 688/1996 Author: Ms. Carolina Teillier Arredondo Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 69 Country Peru Submission date 17 Nov 1995 Date of decision 27 Jul 2000 Comment: This JUTBCCPR/C/69/D/688/1996https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/882/en-US
Ayas v. Sweden
Ayas v. Sweden CAT/C/21/D/97/1997 Communication number s : 097/1997 Author: Orhan Ayas Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 21 Country Sweden Submission date 12 Nov 1997 Date of decision 12 Nov 1998 Comment: This document has no comment: JUTBCAT/C/21/D/97/1997https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/255/en-US
B.S. v. Austria
B.S. v. Austria CAT/C/75/D/1118/2022 Communication number s : 1118/2022 Author: B.S. Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 75 Country Austria Submission date 08 Dec 2021 Date of decision 04 Nov 2022 Comment: This document has no comment: JUTBCAT/C/75/D/1118/2022https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/3619/en-US
BALITSKIY v. Ukraine
BALITSKIY v. Ukraine UKR 03/02/2012 00:00:00 08/11/2016 10:28:05 Case Description: This group of cases concerns the convictions of the applicants between 2002 and 2011 on the basis of self incriminating statements made in the absence of a lawyer and in EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-31116
BEIZARAS AND LEVICKAS v. Lithuania
BEIZARAS AND LEVICKAS v. Lithuania LTU 14/05/2020 00:00:00 12/06/2020 16:56:20 Case Description: This case concerns the refusal of the law enforcement agencies due to their discriminatory attitudes to launch an investigation into the applicants EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-55375
Babkin v. Russian Federation
Babkin v. Russian Federation CCPR/C/92/D/1310/2004 Communication number s : 1310/2004 Author: Konstantin Babkin Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 92 Country Russian Federation Submission date 05 Jan 2004 Date of decision 03 Apr 2008 Comment: JUTBCCPR/C/92/D/1310/2004https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1410/en-US
Bakar Japalali and Carmen Baloyo-Japalali v. Philippines
Bakar Japalali and Carmen Baloyo Japalali v. Philippines CCPR/C/125/D/2536/2015 Communication number s : 2536/2015 Author: Hadji Hamid Japalali Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 125 Country Philippines Submission date 01 Sep 2014 Date of JUTBCCPR/C/125/D/2536/2015https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2569/en-US
Benítez Gamarra v. Paraguay
Ben tez Gamarra v. Paraguay CCPR/C/104/D/1829/2008 Communication number s : 1829/2008 Author: Ernesto Ben tez Gamarra Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 104 Country Paraguay Submission date 25 Aug 2008 Date of decision 22 Mar 2012 Comment: JUTBCCPR/C/104/D/1829/2008https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1222/en-US
Bessis v. France
Bessis v. France CCPR/C/133/D/3215/2018 Communication number s : 3215/2018 Author: Philippe Rudyard Bessis Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 133 Country France Submission date 26 Oct 2017 Date of decision 13 Oct 2021 Comment: This document JUTBCCPR/C/133/D/3215/2018https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/3114/en-US
Bochaton v. France
Bochaton v. France CCPR/C/80/D/1084/2002 Communication number s : 1084/2002 Author: Lionel Bochaton Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 80 Country France Submission date 11 Apr 2002 Date of decision 01 Apr 2004 Comment: Under rule 85 of JUTBCCPR/C/80/D/1084/2002https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/381/en-US
Bodrozic v. Serbia,Federal Republic of Yugoslavia (Serbia and Montenegro)
Bodrozic v. Serbia Federal Republic of Yugoslavia Serbia and Montenegro CCPR/C/85/D/1180/2003 Communication number s : 1180/2003 Author: Zeljko Bodrozic Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 85 Country Serbia Federal Republic of Yugoslavia JUTBCCPR/C/85/D/1180/2003https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1180/en-US
Boucherf v. Algeria
Boucherf v. Algeria CCPR/C/86/D/1196/2003 Communication number s : 1196/2003 Author: Fatma Zohra Boucherf Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 86 Country Algeria Submission date 30 Jun 2003 Date of decision 30 Mar 2006 Comment: This document JUTBCCPR/C/86/D/1196/2003https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1256/en-US
Brada v. France
Brada v. France CAT/C/34/D/195/2002 Communication number s : 195/2002 Author: Mafhoud Brada Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 34 Country France Submission date 29 Nov 2001 Date of decision 17 May 2005 Comment: HR/CAT/PUB/1 p. 146 Substantive JUTBCAT/C/34/D/195/2002https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/137/en-US
Brown v. Namibia
Brown v. Namibia CCPR/C/93/D/1591/2007 Communication number s : 1591/2007 Author: Gordon Brown Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 93 Country Namibia Submission date 12 Sep 2007 Date of decision 23 Jul 2008 Comment: An individual opinion JUTBCCPR/C/93/D/1591/2007https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1378/en-US
Bryhn v. Norway
Bryhn v. Norway CCPR/C/67/D/789/1997 Communication number s : 789/1997 Author: Monica Bryhn Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 67 Country Norway Submission date 05 Nov 1996 Date of decision 29 Oct 1999 Comment: This document has no comment: JUTBCCPR/C/67/D/789/1997https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/834/en-US
CAFAGNA v. Italy
CAFAGNA v. Italy ITA 12/01/2018 00:00:00 13/02/2018 11:26:20 Case Description: Functioning of justice: Unfair criminal proceedings due to the restriction of the applicant s defence rights resulting in his conviction on the basis of a statement made by an EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-48795
CASE OF A AND B v. NORWAY
CASE OF A AND B v. NORWAY 24130/11 29758/11 KJELDAHL R. NOR 11/15/2016 12:00:00 AM No violation of Article 4 of Protocol No. 7 Right not to be tried or punished twice general Article 4 of Protocol No. 7 Right not to be tried or punished twice Criminal ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2016:1115JUD002413011https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-168972
CASE OF A AND OTHERS v. ICELAND
CASE OF A AND OTHERS v. ICELAND 25133/20 31856/20 SGEIRSSON J. J NSD TTIR .I. ISL 11/15/2022 12:00:00 AM Preliminary objection joined to merits and dismissed Art. 35 Admissibility criteria Art. 35 3 a Ratione personae Remainder inadmissible Art. 35 ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2022:1115JUD002513320https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-220885
CASE OF A.H. AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA
CASE OF A.H. AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA 6033/13 8927/13 10549/13 12275/13 23890/13 26309/13 27161/13 29197/13 32224/13 32331/13 32351/13 32368/13 37173/13 38490/13 42340/13 42403/13 INTERNATIONAL PROTECTION CENTRE IN MOSCOW O REAR I. RUS 1/17/2017 12:00:00 AM ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2017:0117JUD000603313https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-170390