Search
Data source
EU member states
Other countries
Keywords
Tags
Displaying 21 - 40 of 2256
Abessolo v. Cameroon
Abessolo v. Cameroon CCPR/C/130/D/2587/2015 Communication number s : 2587/2015 Author: tienne Abessolo Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 130 Country Cameroon Submission date 16 Oct 2014 Date of decision 30 Oct 2020 Comment: This document has JUTBCCPR/C/130/D/2587/2015https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/3282/en-US
Abichou v. Germany
Abichou v. Germany CAT/C/50/D/430/2010 Communication number s : 430/2010 Author: Inass Abichou n e Seifeddine Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 50 Country Germany Submission date 25 Aug 2010 Date of decision 21 May 2013 Comment: This JUTBCAT/C/50/D/430/2010https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/9/en-US
Aboushanif v. Norway
Aboushanif v. Norway CCPR/C/93/D/1542/2007 Communication number s : 1542/2007 Author: Abdeel Keerem Hassan Aboushanif Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 93 Country Norway Submission date 20 Nov 2006 Date of decision 17 Jul 2008 Comment: Two JUTBCCPR/C/93/D/1542/2007https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1436/en-US
Achabal Puertas v. Spain
Achabal Puertas v. Spain CCPR/C/107/D/1945/2010 Communication number s : 1945/2010 Author: Mar a Cruz Achabal Puertas Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 107 Country Spain Submission date 02 Nov 2009 Date of decision 27 Mar 2013 Comment: The JUTBCCPR/C/107/D/1945/2010https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1317/en-US
Akhidenor et al. v. Canada
Akhidenor et al. v. Canada CAT/C/21/D/67/1997 Communication number s : 067/1997 Author: E.O. Akhidenor E. Ainabe R. Akhidenor J. Akhidenor K. Akhidenor and W. Akhidenor Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 21 Country Canada Submission JUTBCAT/C/21/D/67/1997https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/241/en-US
Allakulov v. Uzbekistan
Allakulov v. Uzbekistan CCPR/C/120/D/2430/2014 Communication number s : 2430/2014 Author: Khidirnazar Allakulov Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 120 Country Uzbekistan Submission date 09 Sep 2011 Date of decision 19 Jul 2017 Comment: This JUTBCCPR/C/120/D/2430/2014https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2318/en-US
Anderson v. Australia
Anderson v. Australia CCPR/C/88/D/1367/2005 Communication number s : 1367/2005 Author: Tim Anderson Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 88 Country Australia Submission date 26 Jul 2004 Date of decision 31 Oct 2006 Comment: Pursuant to JUTBCCPR/C/88/D/1367/2005https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1306/en-US
Annex - Third Evaluation Round Evaluation Report on Bosnia and Herzegovina Incriminations (ETS 173 and 191, GPC 2) (Theme I)
Annex Third Evaluation Round Evaluation Report on Bosnia and Herzegovina Incriminations ETS 173 and 191 GPC 2 Theme I BIH 2011 05 27 2011 08 17 Directorate General of Human Rights and Legal Affairs Directorate of Monitoring Strasbourg 27 May 2011 Public GRECOGreco-Eval-III-Rep-2010-5E-Final-BiH-STE-173-Annex-PUBLIChttps://hudoc.greco.coe.int/eng?i=Greco-Eval-III-Rep-2010-5E-Final-BiH-STE-173-Annex-PUBLIC
Arredondo v. Peru
Arredondo v. Peru CCPR/C/69/D/688/1996 Communication number s : 688/1996 Author: Ms. Carolina Teillier Arredondo Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 69 Country Peru Submission date 17 Nov 1995 Date of decision 27 Jul 2000 Comment: This JUTBCCPR/C/69/D/688/1996https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/882/en-US
Ayas v. Sweden
Ayas v. Sweden CAT/C/21/D/97/1997 Communication number s : 097/1997 Author: Orhan Ayas Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 21 Country Sweden Submission date 12 Nov 1997 Date of decision 12 Nov 1998 Comment: This document has no comment: JUTBCAT/C/21/D/97/1997https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/255/en-US
B.B. v. the United Kingdom
B.B. v. the United Kingdom GBR 07/07/2004 00:00:00 26/10/2016 20:41:06 Case Description: Discrimination / protection of private life: Discriminatory treatment on the ground of the applicant s sexual orientation due to this indictment for committing EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-3029
B.S. v. Austria
B.S. v. Austria CAT/C/75/D/1118/2022 Communication number s : 1118/2022 Author: B.S. Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 75 Country Austria Submission date 08 Dec 2021 Date of decision 04 Nov 2022 Comment: This document has no comment: JUTBCAT/C/75/D/1118/2022https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/3619/en-US
B.S. v. Spain
B.S. v. Spain ESP 24/10/2012 00:00:00 02/11/2016 09:41:36 Case Description: Protection against ill treatment and discrimination: Lack of effective investigation into allegations of racially motivated ill treatment inflicted by police agents. Article 3 EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-5760
BALITSKIY v. Ukraine
BALITSKIY v. Ukraine UKR 03/02/2012 00:00:00 08/11/2016 10:28:05 Case Description: This group of cases concerns the convictions of the applicants between 2002 and 2011 on the basis of self incriminating statements made in the absence of a lawyer and in EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-31116
BAYAR AND GURBUZ v. Turkey
BAYAR AND GURBUZ v. Turkey TUR 27/05/2013 00:00:00 10/11/2016 16:04:14 Case Description: Access to and efficient functioning of justice: Unfair criminal proceedings in 2004 on account of the inadmissibility of the applicants appeal on points of law on EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-37292
BEIZARAS AND LEVICKAS v. Lithuania
BEIZARAS AND LEVICKAS v. Lithuania LTU 14/05/2020 00:00:00 12/06/2020 16:56:20 Case Description: This case concerns the refusal of the law enforcement agencies due to their discriminatory attitudes to launch an investigation into the applicants EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-55375
BONEV v. Bulgaria
BONEV v. Bulgaria BGR 08/09/2006 00:00:00 04/11/2016 14:50:56 Case Description: Access to and effective functioning of justice: Unfair criminal proceedings due to inability of the accused to cross examine the witnesses whose statements had served as the EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-14711
BOROVSKY v. Slovakia
BOROVSKY v. Slovakia SVK 02/09/2009 00:00:00 02/11/2016 13:55:44 Case Description: Access to and efficient functioning of justice: Breach of the presumption of innocence on account of police authorities statements to the media at the very initial stages EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-8121
BOWMAN v. the United Kingdom
BOWMAN v. the United Kingdom GBR 19/02/1998 00:00:00 26/10/2016 20:41:06 Case Description: Freedom of expression: Disproportionate interference due to the applicant s prosecution for having distributed leaflets indicating that certain political candidates EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-2434
Babkin v. Russian Federation
Babkin v. Russian Federation CCPR/C/92/D/1310/2004 Communication number s : 1310/2004 Author: Konstantin Babkin Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 92 Country Russian Federation Submission date 05 Jan 2004 Date of decision 03 Apr 2008 Comment: JUTBCCPR/C/92/D/1310/2004https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1410/en-US