Search
Data source
EU member states
Other countries
Keywords
Tags
Displaying 1741 - 1760 of 2256
GELENIDZE v. Georgia
GELENIDZE v. Georgia GEO 07/02/2020 00:00:00 19/02/2020 17:13:47 Case Description: Functioning of justice: Unfair criminal proceedings due to the infringement of the applicant s rights to be informed promptly of the accusation against her and to be EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-54759
GEORGIADIS v. Cyprus
GEORGIADIS v. Cyprus CYP 14/08/2002 00:00:00 26/10/2016 17:40:39 Case Description: Access to and effective functioning of justice: Excessive length of criminal proceedings against a businessman who was finally acquitted. Article 6 1 Status of Execution: EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-1986
GHIREA v. the Republic of Moldova
GHIREA v. the Republic of Moldova MDA 26/09/2012 00:00:00 02/11/2016 10:38:31 Case Description: Functioning of justice: Breach of the principles of legal certainty and of equality of arms due to the Supreme Court s acceptance of the prosecutor s appeal EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-6978
GOGGINS v. the United Kingdom
GOGGINS v. the United Kingdom GBR 08/03/2012 00:00:00 26/10/2016 20:41:06 Case Description: Interference with private and family life: Collection and retention of their DNA samples fingerprints and associated data despite either being acquitted of EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-2874
GOMI AND OTHERS v. Turkey
GOMI AND OTHERS v. Turkey TUR 21/03/2007 00:00:00 10/11/2016 15:53:30 Case Description: The case concerns a violation of the right to life on account of the lack of an effective investigation into the death of the applicants relatives the G mi and others EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-37220
GREVIO’s (Baseline) Evaluation Report on legislative and other measures giving effect to the provisions of the Council of Europe Convention on Preventing and Combating Violence against Women and Domestic Violence (Istanbul Convention)
GREVIO s Baseline Evaluation Report on legislative and other measures giving effect to the provisions of the Council of Europe Convention on Preventing and Combating Violence against Women and Domestic Violence Istanbul Convention NOR a20 a22 a31 a50 a51 GREVIOGREVIO-Inf(2022)30_Norway_Baseline_Evaluation_Report_Enghttps://hudoc.grevio.coe.int/eng?i=GREVIO-Inf(2022)30_Norway_Baseline_Evaluation_Report_Eng
GREVIO’s (Baseline) Evaluation Report on legislative and other measures giving effect to the provisions of the Council of Europe Convention on Preventing and Combating Violence against Women and Domestic Violence (Istanbul Convention) BOSNIA AND H
GREVIO s Baseline Evaluation Report on legislative and other measures giving effect to the provisions of the Council of Europe Convention on Preventing and Combating Violence against Women and Domestic Violence Istanbul Convention BOSNIA AND HERZEGOVINA GREVIOGREVIO-Inf(2022)19_Bosnia-and-Herzegovina_Baseline_Evaluation_Report_enghttps://hudoc.grevio.coe.int/eng?i=GREVIO-Inf(2022)19_Bosnia-and-Herzegovina_Baseline_Evaluation_Report_eng
GREVIO’s (Baseline) Evaluation Report on legislative and other measures giving effect to the provisions of the Council of Europe Convention on Preventing and Combating Violence against Women and Domestic Violence(Istanbul Convention) - ICELAND
GREVIO s Baseline Evaluation Report on legislative and other measures giving effect to the provisions of the Council of Europe Convention on Preventing and Combating Violence against Women and Domestic Violence Istanbul Convention ICELAND ISL cor 2022 10 GREVIOGREVIO-Inf(2022)26_Iceland_Baseline_Evaluation_Report_enghttps://hudoc.grevio.coe.int/eng?i=GREVIO-Inf(2022)26_Iceland_Baseline_Evaluation_Report_eng
GREVIO’s (Baseline) Evaluation Report on legislative and other measures giving effect to the provisions of the Council of Europe Convention on Preventing and Combating Violence against Women and Domestic Violence (Istanbul Convention) SWEDEN
GREVIO s Baseline Evaluation Report on legislative and other measures giving effect to the provisions of the Council of Europe Convention on Preventing and Combating Violence against Women and Domestic Violence Istanbul Convention SWEDEN SWE a24 2018 12 GREVIOGREVIO-Inf(2018)15_Sweden_Baseline_Evaluation_Report_enghttps://hudoc.grevio.coe.int/eng?i=GREVIO-Inf(2018)15_Sweden_Baseline_Evaluation_Report_eng
Gallardo Martínez et al. v. Mexico
Gallardo Mart nez et al. v. Mexico CAT/C/72/D/992/2020 Communication number s : 992/2020 Author: Dami n Gallardo Mart nez on his own behalf and on that of his four minor children Yolanda Barranco Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 72 Country JUTBCAT/C/72/D/992/2020https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/3340/en-US
García Sánchez and González Clares v. Spain
Garc a S nchez and Gonz lez Clares v. Spain CCPR/C/88/D/1332/2004 Communication number s : 1332/2004 Author: Juan Garc a S nchez and Bienvenida Gonz lez Clares Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 88 Country Spain Submission date 04 Nov 2002 JUTBCCPR/C/88/D/1332/2004https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1295/en-US
Goekce v. Austria
Goekce v. Austria CEDAW/C/39/D/5/2005 Communication number s : 005/2005 Author: Hakan Goekce Handan Goekce and Guelue Goekce descendants of the deceased Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 39 Country Austria Submission date 21 Jul 2004 Date of JUTBCEDAW/C/39/D/5/2005https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1715/en-US
Gomaríz Valera v. Spain
Gomar z Valera v. Spain CCPR/C/84/D/1095/2002 Communication number s : 1095/2002 Author: Bernardino Gomar z Valera Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 84 Country Spain Submission date 04 Sep 1997 Date of decision 22 Jul 2005 Comment: An JUTBCCPR/C/84/D/1095/2002https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1191/en-US
Gordon v. Jamaica
Gordon v. Jamaica CCPR/C/46/D/237/1987 Communication number s : 237/1987 Author: Denroy Gordon Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 46 Country Jamaica Submission date 29 May 1987 Date of decision 05 Nov 1992 Comment: on 2 November 1987 and on JUTBCCPR/C/46/D/237/1987https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/444/en-US
Gorji-Dinka v. Cameroon
Gorji Dinka v. Cameroon CCPR/C/83/D/1134/2002 Communication number s : 1134/2002 Author: Fongum Gorji Dinka Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 83 Country Cameroon Submission date 14 Mar 2002 Date of decision 17 Mar 2005 Comment: This document JUTBCCPR/C/83/D/1134/2002https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1174/en-US
Government comments on the fourth report on Cyprus
Government comments on the fourth report on Cyprus CYP 2011 03 23 2011 05 31 Government comments on the report on CYPRUS APPENDIX: GOVERNMENT S VIEWPOINT APPENDIXThe following appendix does not form part of ECRI s analysis and proposals concerning the ECRICYP-COM-IV-2011-020-ENGhttps://hudoc.ecri.coe.int/eng?i=CYP-COM-IV-2011-020-ENG
Government comments on the third report on Denmark
Government comments on the third report on Denmark DNK 2005 12 16 2006 05 16 APPENDIX The following appendix does not form part of ECRI s analysis and proposals concerning the situation in Denmark ECRI wishes to point out that the analysis contained in ECRIDNK-COM-III-2006-018-ENGhttps://hudoc.ecri.coe.int/eng?i=DNK-COM-III-2006-018-ENG
H.C.M.A. v. Netherlands
H.C.M.A. v. Netherlands CCPR/C/35/D/213/1986 Communication number s : 213/1986 Author: H.C.M.A. name deleted Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 35 Country Netherlands Submission date 31 Oct 1986 Date of decision 30 Mar 1989 Comment: JUTBCCPR/C/35/D/213/1986https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/303/en-US
H.K. v. Norway
H.K. v. Norway CCPR/C/112/D/2004/2010 Communication number s : 2004/2010 Author: H.K. represented by counsel Christian B. Hjort and later by John Chr. Elden and Anders Brosveet Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 112 Country Norway Submission JUTBCCPR/C/112/D/2004/2010https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1898/en-US
H.P.N. v. Spain
H.P.N. v. Spain CCPR/C/107/D/1943/2010 Communication number s : 1943/2010 Author: H.P.N. Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 107 Country Spain Submission date 03 Feb 2010 Date of decision 25 Mar 2013 Comment: This document has no JUTBCCPR/C/107/D/1943/2010https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1330/en-US