Search
Data source
EU member states
Other countries
Keywords
Tags
Displaying 5041 - 5060 of 5090
X. and Y. v. Russian Federation
X. and Y. v. Russian Federation CEDAW/C/73/D/100/2016 Communication number s : 100/2016 Author: X. and Y. Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 73 Country Russian Federation Submission date 29 Dec 2015 Date of decision 16 Jul 2019 Comment: This JUTBCEDAW/C/73/D/100/2016https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2658/en-US
X and Y v. Switzerland
X and Y v. Switzerland CAT/C/66/D/776/2016 Communication number s : 776/2016 Author: X and Y represented by counsel Marcel Zirngast Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 66 Country Switzerland Submission date 19 Oct 2016 Date of decision 23 Apr JUTBCAT/C/66/D/776/2016https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2581/en-US
X and Y v. Switzerland
X and Y v. Switzerland CAT/C/75/D/1081/2021 Communication number s : 1081/2021 Author: X and Y Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 75 Country Switzerland Submission date 10 Jun 2021 Date of decision 11 Nov 2022 Comment: This document has no JUTBCAT/C/75/D/1081/2021https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/3613/en-US
X et al. v. Slovenia
X et al. v. Slovenia CCPR/C/136/D/3024/2017 Communication number s : 3024/2017 Author: X et al. Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 136 Country Slovenia Submission date 05 Dec 2013 Date of decision 04 Nov 2022 Comment: This document has JUTBCCPR/C/136/D/3024/2017https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/3545/en-US
X. v. Afghanistan,Sweden
X. v. Afghanistan Sweden CCPR/C/103/D/1833/2008 Communication number s : 1833/2008 Author: X. Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 103 Country Afghanistan Sweden Submission date 26 Nov 2008 Date of decision 01 Nov 2011 Comment: Pursuant to rule JUTBCCPR/C/103/D/1833/2008https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1390/en-US
X. v. Austria
X. v. Austria CEDAW/C/64/D/67/2014 Communication number s : 067/2014 Author: X. Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 64 Country Austria Submission date 15 Nov 2013 Date of decision 11 Jul 2016 Comment: This document has no comment: JUTBCEDAW/C/64/D/67/2014https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2108/en-US
X v. Latvia
X v. Latvia CCPR/C/136/D/3254/2018 Communication number s : 3254/2018 Author: X Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 136 Country Latvia Submission date 02 May 2017 Date of decision 04 Nov 2022 Comment: This document has no comment: JUTBCCPR/C/136/D/3254/2018https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/3494/en-US
X v. Lithuania
X v. Lithuania CCPR/C/125/D/2564/2015 Communication number s : 2564/2015 Author: X Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 125 Country Lithuania Submission date 14 Aug 2014 Date of decision 29 Mar 2019 Comment: This document has no comment: JUTBCCPR/C/125/D/2564/2015https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/3318/en-US
X v. Spain
X v. Spain CCPR/C/93/D/1456/2006 Communication number s : 1456/2006 Author: X Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 93 Country Spain Submission date 14 Feb 2006 Date of decision 24 Jul 2008 Comment: The texts of two individual opinions one JUTBCCPR/C/93/D/1456/2006https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1448/en-US
X v. Switzerland
X v. Switzerland CAT/C/59/D/686/2015 Communication number s : 686/2015 Author: X Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 58 Country Switzerland Submission date 02 Jun 2015 Date of decision 05 Dec 2016 Comment: This document has no comment: JUTBCAT/C/59/D/686/2015https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2183/en-US
X v. Switzerland
X v. Switzerland CAT/C/67/D/775/2016 Communication number s : 775/2016 Author: X represented by counsel Roman Schuler Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 67 Country Switzerland Submission date 24 Oct 2016 Date of decision 05 Aug 2019 Comment: JUTBCAT/C/67/D/775/2016https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2625/en-US
X. v. Timor-Leste
X. v. Timor Leste CEDAW/C/69/D/88/2015 Communication number s : 088/2015 Author: X. Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 69 Country Timor Leste Submission date 16 Feb 2015 Date of decision 26 Feb 2018 Comment: This document has no comment: JUTBCEDAW/C/69/D/88/2015https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2638/en-US
X. v. Timor-Leste
X. v. Timor Leste CEDAW/C/69/D/88/2015 Communication number s : 088/2015 Author: X. Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 69 Country Timor Leste Submission date Date of decision 26 Feb 2018 Comment: This document has no comment: Substantive JUTBCEDAW/C/69/D/88/2015https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2428/en-US
XERO FLOR W POLSCE SP. Z O.O. v. Poland
XERO FLOR W POLSCE SP. Z O.O. v. Poland POL 07/08/2021 00:00:00 04/10/2021 09:59:18 Case Description: The case concerns the breach of the applicant company s right to a tribunal established by law due to the participation of judge M.M. in the EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-58569
Y.B. v. Russian Federation
Y.B. v. Russian Federation CCPR/C/110/D/1983/2010 Communication number s : 1983/2010 Author: Y.B. Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 110 Country Russian Federation Submission date 06 Apr 2010 Date of decision 25 Mar 2014 Comment: This JUTBCCPR/C/110/D/1983/2010https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1813/en-US
Y.L. v. Canada
Y.L. v. Canada CCPR/C/27/D/112/1981 Communication number s : 112/1981 Author: Y.L. name deleted Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 27 Country Canada Submission date 07 Dec 1981 Date of decision 08 Apr 1986 Comment: Individual opinion JUTBCCPR/C/27/D/112/1981https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/745/en-US
Y.M. v. Russian Federation
Y.M. v. Russian Federation CCPR/C/116/D/2059/2011 Communication number s : 2059/2011 Author: Y.M. Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 116 Country Russian Federation Submission date 05 Jul 2010 Date of decision 31 Mar 2016 Comment: This JUTBCCPR/C/116/D/2059/2011https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2113/en-US
Y.R. v. Russian Federation
Y.R. v. Russian Federation CAT/C/72/D/869/2018 Communication number s : 869/2018 Author: Y.R. Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 72 Country Russian Federation Submission date 05 Dec 2017 Date of decision 12 Nov 2021 Comment: This JUTBCAT/C/72/D/869/2018https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/3351/en-US
YUDINA v. Russia
YUDINA v. Russia RUS 10/10/2012 00:00:00 04/11/2016 11:41:33 Case Description: The case concerns the excessive and unjustified force used by the police in Kiselevsk Kemerovo Region in 1998 against the applicant when searching her home in connection with a EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-14146
Yashar Agazade and Rasul Jafarov v. Azerbaijan
Yashar Agazade and Rasul Jafarov v. Azerbaijan CCPR/C/118/D/2205/2012 Communication number s : 2205/2012 Author: Yashar Agazade and Rasul Jafarov Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 118 Country Azerbaijan Submission date 02 Nov 2012 Date of JUTBCCPR/C/118/D/2205/2012https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2235/en-US