Search
Data source
EU member states
Other countries
Keywords
Tags
Displaying 1 - 20 of 201
11. b Optional Protocol to the Convention on the Rights of the Child on the involvement of children in armed conflict
STATUS AS AT : 14 06 2023 09:15:30 EDT CHAPTER IV HUMAN RIGHTS 11. b Optional Protocol to the Convention on the Rights of the Child on the involvement of children in armed conflict New York 25 May 2000 Entry into force : 12 February 2002 in accordance UNIV-11-bhttps://treaties.un.org//Pages/ViewDetails.aspx?src=TREATY&mtdsg_no=IV-11-b&chapter=4&clang=_en
A/HRC/47/17: Report of the Working Group on the Universal Periodic Review - Nauru
United Nations A/HRC/47/17 General Assembly Distr.: General 12 April 2021 Original: English Human Rights Council Forty seventh session 21 June 9 July 2021 Agenda item 6 Universal periodic review Report of the Working Group on the Universal Periodic Review UPRA/HRC/47/17https://www.ohchr.org//en/documents/country-reports/ahrc4717-report-working-group-universal-periodic-review-nauru
B.K. v. Norway
B.K. v. Norway CAT/C/62/D/722/2015 Communication number s : 722/2015 Author: B.K. not represented by counsel Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 62 Country Norway Submission date 21 Dec 2015 Date of decision 04 Dec 2017 Comment: JUTBCAT/C/62/D/722/2015https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2414/en-US
BELGIUM: CONCLUDING OBSERVATIONS
BELGIUM: CONCLUDING OBSERVATIONS CRC/C/BEL/CO/5 6 NULL 2019 02 28T00:00:00 CRC United Nations CRC/C/BEL/CO/5 6 Convention on the Distr.: General 28 February 2019 Rights of the Child Original: English Committee on the Rights of the Child Concluding UHRICRC/C/BEL/CO/5-6https://uhri.ohchr.org/en/document/c82b0164-aa9a-41b3-8fa1-abc3ce70a94f
CASE OF AHMED v. AUSTRIA
CASE OF AHMED v. AUSTRIA 25964/94 N/A AUT 12/17/1996 12:00:00 AM Lack of jurisdiction new complaint Violation of Art. 3 Pecuniary damage claim dismissed Non pecuniary damage finding of violation sufficient Costs and expenses partial award domestic ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:1996:1217JUD002596494https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-58001
CASE OF ALEKSANYAN v. RUSSIA
CASE OF ALEKSANYAN v. RUSSIA 46468/06 HOLINER D.P. RUS 12/22/2008 12:00:00 AM Preliminary objection dismissed abuse of the right of petition No violation of Art. 3 substantive aspect Violation of Art. 5 3 Violation of Art. 8 Violation of Art. 34 Decree ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2008:1222JUD004646806https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-90390
CASE OF ČAMANS AND TIMOFEJEVA v. LATVIA
CASE OF AMANS AND TIMOFEJEVA v. LATVIA 42906/12 GARGAZINS V. LVA 4/28/2016 12:00:00 AM Violation of Article 5 Right to liberty and security Article 5 1 Deprivation of liberty Procedure prescribed by law No violation of Article 5 Right to liberty and ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2016:0428JUD004290612https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-162218
CASE OF AVSAR v. TURKEY
CASE OF AVSAR v. TURKEY 25657/94 N/A TUR 7/10/2001 12:00:00 AM Preliminary objection partially dismissed non exhaustion of domestic remedies Preliminary objection partially joined to merits non exhaustion of domestic remedies Violation of Art. 2 with ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2001:0710JUD002565794https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-59562
CASE OF B AND C v. SWITZERLAND
CASE OF B AND C v. SWITZERLAND 889/19 43987/16 SURBER B. CHE 11/17/2020 12:00:00 AM Struck out of the list Art. 37 Striking out applications general Art. 37 1 Striking out applications Art. 37 1 c Continued examination not justified Violation of Article 3 ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2020:1117JUD000088919https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-206153
CASE OF BATIASHVILI v. GEORGIA
CASE OF BATIASHVILI v. GEORGIA 8284/07 BARATASHVILI I. GEO 10/10/2019 12:00:00 AM Remainder inadmissible Art. 35 Admissibility criteria Art. 35 1 Exhaustion of domestic remedies Art. 35 3 a Manifestly ill founded No violation of Article 5 Right to liberty ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2019:1010JUD000828407https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-196374
CASE OF BETTERIDGE v. THE UNITED KINGDOM
CASE OF BETTERIDGE v. THE UNITED KINGDOM 1497/10 CHIVERS SOLICITORS GBR 1/29/2013 12:00:00 AM Violation of Article 5 Right to liberty and security Article 5 4 Review of lawfulness of detention Speediness of review 448 438 474 ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2013:0129JUD000149710https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-116121
CASE OF BOUYID v. BELGIUM
CASE OF BOUYID v. BELGIUM 23380/09 MARCHAND C CHIHAOUI Z. BEL 9/28/2015 12:00:00 AM Violation of Article 3 Prohibition of torture Article 3 Degrading treatment Substantive aspect Violation of Article 3 Prohibition of torture Article 3 Effective ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2015:0928JUD002338009https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-157670
CASE OF BREYER v. GERMANY
CASE OF BREYER v. GERMANY 50001/12 DEU 1/30/2020 12:00:00 AM No violation of Article 8 Right to respect for private and family life Article 8 1 Respect for private life 451 429 319 556 268 262 329 333 376 391 238 354 ECLI:CE:ECHR:2020:0130JUD005000112 ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2020:0130JUD005000112https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-200442
CASE OF BRITISH GURKHA WELFARE SOCIETY AND OTHERS v. THE UNITED KINGDOM
CASE OF BRITISH GURKHA WELFARE SOCIETY AND OTHERS v. THE UNITED KINGDOM 44818/11 E. COOPER OF SLATER AND GORDON UK LLP GBR 9/15/2016 12:00:00 AM Remainder inadmissible Article 35 1 Exhaustion of domestic remedies No violation of Article 14 P1 1 1 ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2016:0915JUD004481811https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-166691
CASE OF ÖCALAN v. TURKEY (No. 2) [Extracts]
CASE OF CALAN v. TURKEY No. 2 Extracts 24069/03 197/04 6201/06 10464/07 OTTY T. MULLER M. TUGLUK A. ERBAS D. DUNDAR I. KAPLAN H. TEPE M. KOSTAK F. AYDINKAYA F. GUNES O. BILMEZ I. KAYA B. TUR S. EMEKCI E. BILGIC K. KORKUT H. SAKAR M. YALCINDAG R. BULGAN N. ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2014:0318JUD002406903https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-142087
CASE OF CENTRO EUROPA 7 S.R.L. AND DI STEFANO v. ITALY
CASE OF CENTRO EUROPA 7 S.R.L. AND DI STEFANO v. ITALY 38433/09 PACE A. GRANDINETTI O. MASTROIANNI R. FERRARO F. ITA 6/7/2012 12:00:00 AM Preliminary objection allowed Article 35 3 Ratione personae Preliminary objection dismissed Article 35 1 Six month ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2012:0607JUD003843309https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-111399
CASE OF CERNEA v. ROMANIA
CASE OF CERNEA v. ROMANIA 43609/10 ROU 2/27/2018 12:00:00 AM No violation of Article 14 P1 3 Prohibition of discrimination Article 14 Discrimination Article 3 of Protocol No. 1 Right to free elections general Free expression of the opinion of the people ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2018:0227JUD004360910https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-181372
CASE OF CROISSANT v. GERMANY
CASE OF CROISSANT v. GERMANY 13611/88 N/A DEU 9/25/1992 12:00:00 AM No violation of Art. 6 1 No violation of Art. 6 3 c Code of Criminal Procedure Articles 137 140 141 142 465 German Regulations on Lawyers Bundesrechtsanwaltsordnung Articles 48 49 Land of ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:1992:0925JUD001361188https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-57736
CASE OF EL HASKI v. BELGIUM
CASE OF EL HASKI v. BELGIUM 649/08 MARCHAND Ch. BEL 9/25/2012 12:00:00 AM Remainder inadmissible Violation of Article 6 Right to a fair trial Article 6 Criminal proceedings Article 6 1 Fair hearing Non pecuniary damage award 350 90 193 445 76 136 14 216 ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2012:0925JUD000064908https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-113445
CASE OF FAYED v. THE UNITED KINGDOM
CASE OF FAYED v. THE UNITED KINGDOM 17101/90 N/A GBR 9/21/1994 12:00:00 AM Preliminary objection rejected non exhaustion No violation of Art. 6 1 Not necessary to examine Art. 13 Companies Act 1985 Sections 432 para. 2 434 436 437 para. 3 c 14 128 445 7 ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:1994:0921JUD001710190https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-57890